Take the difference between men and women - or maybe I should say the masculine and feminine. The masculine has always been consider the rational, the assertive, the protecting, the providing, the creating, the discovering, the inventing.
The feminine as always been consider the passive, the receptive, the emotional, the supporting, the nurturing.
Each, of course, can go bad.
The simplest phrase I have encountered to explain these things has been the concept of Yin and Yang. Yang is masculine and Yin is feminine: "Yang protects Yin and Yin nurtures Yang.
So what happens if men stop protecting women and women stop nurturing men? Oh boy.
Just look around you. When men stop protecting they go PUA or MGTOW. Fight or flight.
And women? Women are never going to attain all of those masculine virtues. It's not their nature, no matter how much they delude themselves. As a result women will always be 100% dependent on men. These days they can either marry men or marry the State. "Strong and independent," indeed.
Imagine if the most essential men didn't go to work tomorrow - say those who supply the power and power? Societal collapse in a few hours.
If society did collapse it would be men who got it online, not women.
What corrupts the masculine and feminine more than anything else? The interference of government. And more than anything else, bad government is about money and power.
It'd be amusing to see these things taught in school. "Sorry, girls, if men didn't provide for and protect you, you couldn't do it on your own. As the humorist P.J. O'Rourke once wrote, without men civilization would last until the next oil change."