These concepts are never opposed to each other, but complementary. One cannot exist without the other. And, obviously, they have to be in balance.
Years ago I remember watching the movie Koyaanisqatsi, which means "Life Out of Balance." It's a rather interesting film, one worth seeing.
Of course, when things are out of balance, they end up spinning out of control.
All you have to do is pay a little bit of attention, and it's not hard at all to see that things are out of balance, especially, these days, the relationships between men and women.
The first time I realized something was wrong when I encountered the monster Shulamith Firestone (an early radical feminist) in college. I think I was 20.
Doesn't even look right, does she? She wasn't. She became schizophrenic and ended up being found dead in her apartment.
Wikipedia had this to say about her: "Firestone argued that gender inequality originated in the patriarchal societal structures imposed upon women through their biology; the physical, social and psychological disadvantages imposed by pregnancy, childbirth, and subsequent child-rearing. She advocated the use of cybernetics to carry out human reproduction in laboratories as well as the proliferation of contraception, abortion, and state support for child-rearing; enabling them to escape their biologically determined positions in society. Firestone described pregnancy as 'barbaric', and writes that a friend of hers compared labor to 'shitting a pumpkin'. Among the reproductive technologies she predicted were sex selection and in vitro fertilization.
"Firestone explored a number of possible social changes that she argued would result in a post-patriarchal society, including the abolition of the nuclear family and the promotion of living in community units within a socialist society."
In other words, it's always society's fault, and human nature is completely plastic. That's pure infantile leftism.
I thought she was such a nut her ideas would go nowhere, but unfortunately they have, in one form or another. Look around you, and see where her leftist ideas have led.
Such women are leftists and ultimately hate men (Eric von Kuehnelt-Leddihn described leftism as the attempt to "overthrow the Father"), which is why leftism is atheistic and materialistic and thinks everyone should be "equal," much like ants. And that includes getting rid of the biological differences between men and women. Or getting rid of men completely, the way Valerie Solanis wanted to do (Solanis shot Andy Warhol and was diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic).
Speaking of Kuehnelt-Leddihn, in his magnum opus, Leftism Revisited he points out leftists have always tried to transcend human nature though bizarre, hallucinatory fantasies, which they really thought could manifest itself in reality if we just thought about it hard enough.
When things are out of balance between the masculine and feminine, both parts become destructive, just in different ways. The masculine doesn't attempt to destroy the feminine, just crush it and control it. The feminine, unfortunately, attempts to destroy the masculine and turn it into the feminine. Which means, ultimately the feminine ends up destroying itself.
Which is self-delusion, since women are completely dependent on men. If men were to withdraw everything they have created from women, they'd be in a hell of a mess, wouldn't they?
Now if it's true that everything is masculine/feminine from the top to the bottom, it means we'll never make them the same, that is, equal. If somehow we did, we wouldn't be human anymore, and would probably go extinct.
That might be what some leftists want, though.
I strongly recommend The Other McCain's Sex Trouble columns at http://theothermccain.com/category/feminism/sex-trouble/
It's a well thought out review of Feminist history.
Have you ever noticed that all forms of Leftist politics ultimately preach of, require, or result in the mass murder of "undesirables" who have been stripped of their "humanity" and are therefore not seen as "human"?
She looks like she has a few loose screws, Bob. I don't know this woman from a hole in the ground but if I heard her speak, I just know she would sound like a flake too. It drives the lefties nuts but yes you can judge people by their looks with few exceptions.
My time's too precious for these femcnuts. I would rather do CHORES than waste time talking to cretins like that.
This is OUR fault. Our women are whores and perverts because we let them and nobody calls them on it. It may be rotten but it's true - when these idiots die they leave the world a better place. They've gone down that slippery slope, they're miserable because of it and the only thing that would cheer them up is dragging you down so you could be miserable with them.
My world is not out of balance. If it starts to go that way I fix it. When my daughter came out of the closet to announce she was a militant gay feminist and that our family would get politically correct or else - I took the 'or else' option and threw her and her hulking ugly girlfriend out! I am not going to be a punching bag for a couple of dykes or take orders from them.
I'm not having that crap in my home or world and we're all adults. I was called awful names and told I was intolerant but nobody had the guts to say the same to my sanctimonious gay daughter. My in laws told me to shape up or I was out of their will - and I told them they weren't welcome in my home either.
It cost me my family but I stuck to my guns. Christmas is a little hard without my daughter...but I don't have to put up with my asshole liberal in-laws so things kinda offset each other.
I hope my family sorts itself out but if it doesn't - so be it. I shouldn't have to subvert my morals and ethics in order to get along with somebody that has thrown theirs away.
Vox Day once said that if we throw away our civilization there is no guarantee that a better one will be established. I think this one is worth fighting for - even if it means standing up to your own family.
Those Sex Troubles columns are excellent, and yes, leftists are destroyers, and since feminists are leftists, they too are destroyers, including getting rid of all the "undesirables" so we can be reborn as gods.
I always ask if all these "-isms" are organic Truth, why do they need shelves of law books and cradle-to-grave propaganda to enforce?
Computer models, ideals -- this is what gnostic society tells us is "reality."
It's amazing what I learned when I was 12 just walking through the the woods by myself. Like the fact so many things went in cycles.
The Cult of Equality is also rooted in overthrowing the Father. Men who advocate for Equality advocate (unknowingly or otherwise) for their own enslavement. By 'legal' means, to be sure.
If everyone is Equal and all peachy Egalitarian, then NOBODY (including God the Father) is in charge. Hierarchy (the male way) is ruled evil and oppressive. All decisions, to be 'fair', must be made by Group Consensus, which is the female-imperative strategy. Moderns call this democracy, voting, etc. Note which gender controls the vote and political power in America and the west. Equality for thee, no Equality for me.
Shulamith Firebreath's photo yields this:
"And, behold, there was lifted up a talent of lead: and this is a woman that sitteth in the midst of the ephah.
"And he said, This is wickedness. And he cast it into the midst of the ephah; and he cast the weight of lead upon the mouth thereof."
I think they knowingly long for it Ray. Some men just want to say to hell with it all and let women worry about life's challenges and problems.
A slave (or a beta, or a mangina or a pussy - whatever you want to call them)doesn't have to think, he doesn't have to worry about responsibility, and he is quite happy having someone - even a feminist - telling him what to do all the time.
This is no cycle, Bob. This is collapse. Men are going Galt in droves even if they don't see it that way. Consider: if men can't handle basic responsibilities like parenting, budgeting and saving...how in hell is a bloody woman? Never mind the stunned cnuts that are the typical feminists. Is it any wonder they are buckling under the stress? And trying to throw that all back on men?
Sorry boys, there is only one way to tackle the big problems: take ownership of them, take responsibility for them - and solve them. If you expect women to do that for you, you will be as disappointed as if you had asked a child to do it. The best person in the world to look after you and your family is YOU.
But of course, none of that will sit well with stupid people, liberals and women.
Bob, have you checked this article out?
Wow. Never thought about that, but it does make sense.
Post a Comment