Tuesday, September 23, 2014

"American Women and Marriage: a Sacred Vow (Why I Will NEVER Marry an American Woman)"

This is a cost/benefit analysis. It involves some basic math and statistics. It's what men do. Most women can't seem to figure out that men use it. Or why they use it.

This article is from the site Niceguy's American Women (Mostly) Suck

"The idea of marrying an American woman literally terrifies me.

"Can I not handle having sex with one person for the rest of my life? Am I incapable of settling-down? Am I afraid of commitment? Well, no... not exactly. It's because marrying an American woman is most likely prepping your marriage for failure.

"It's a sad fact that in America, more than 60% of marriages end in divorce. Even more sad is that roughly 75% of divorces are initiated by the woman over the man's objections (the remaining 25% are either mutually-agreed divorces or divorces initiated by the husband over the woman's objections; those two categories are about half and half within that remaining 25%). These are all conservative numbers, by the way; they've been rounded-down for the sake of simplicity. So, if 60% of marriages end in divorce, and 75% of those are initiated by the woman, we can do the math to combine these percentages: (.75(.6)) x 100 = 45.

"There is at least a 45% chance that whenever a man gets married to an American woman, the woman will want to divorce him at some point. You have better chances at surviving Russian roulette!

"Furthermore, a man is many times more likely to commit suicide in the two years following a divorce than the average male. Russian roulette, indeed. American females literally become man-destroyers.

"The biggest disincentive for marriage lies within the women themselves. The numbers reveal that they are family-wreckers. Marrying an American woman is a risky activity for us guys. What do American women want more: a husband or a house full of fancy appliances? They often act as if they think their appliances are worth more than the useless human lumps they're currently saddled with.

"Think about it: there is a more than two in five chance that an American woman is incapable of mustering the love and commitment needed to make a marriage work! The numbers show they make lousy wives and they don't even think their marriage vows mean very much. Why marry one? Honestly now- why the flaming hell should you even consider marrying one?! Would you ever stick your hand in a garbage disposal if there's a more than two-in-five chance that someone will suddenly hit the 'on' switch?? It's putting your face in the fire! It's asking for trouble, plain and simple. Marrying an American chick is probably one of the worst things you could ever do with your life. Just do a simple cost/benefit analysis; that's what the numbers show!

"Women often plan their divorces in advance; the husband always seems to be the last to know and many men say they are stunned when the bomb suddenly drops. Many had no idea the marriage was even in trouble... Naturally, the assumption for everyone is that men must be boneheads to not pick-up on the subtle cues that their marriage is in trouble. But is it really because men are insensitive, unfeeling idiots or is it because women are simply quite good at being secretive in their machinations? Despite the fact that women claim it is men who can't communicate, many women deliberately lie to their husbands about the state of their marriage until the last minute.

"In a reply to a readers' response way back in the past, I once described getting the girl in the end not as a victory, but as a booby-prize or a defeat wrapped inside a victory. Well, here is one of the grandest ironies of the American female: if you are the type of man who can put-up with her bullshit and win her in the end (and fall in love with her and marry her) then there's a very good chance that she will want to cut the marriage short(!)

"I can only conclude that marrying an American woman is nothing more than poisoned candy! She will only be with you as long as she can get pleasure or utility out of you. And whenever it strikes her fancy, she will drop-kick you to the curb after she's done. And even then, some of these divorcees will smugly sneer that it is men who 'can't commit'.

"Perhaps the reason why they claim men can't commit is because women find it pretty darn easy to get-out of commitments in the way that somebody might change a pair of socks? But nay, nay- it must be the man who is at fault. If she divorces her husband, then it was because the man was the problem and certainly not the person who actually contacted her lawyer to request divorce papers.

"It's Sacred Vow Time...

"Today, I am formally declaring a sacred vow. I might've hinted this in the past, and I don't think I've ever actually formally said it until now... but here goes. Let it be heard now and forever: I will never allow any American woman to ever marry me!

"That's right. Here and now, I'm officially writing-off the entire American female populace as being a group which is unfit for the commitment of marriage. Chances are, they just aren't capable of holding a marriage together. Chances are, they are inept when it comes to fulfilling their marriage vows. Odds are, they lack the basic human skill of recognizing their partner's unfulfilled needs. They are, in short, unsalvageable human beings. Yes, I've suggested something along those lines many times before, but I'd always left-open the possibility that maybe by some miracle there might be some American woman out there who doesn't suck. (And yes, there indeed might be one or two American women out there who don't suck.) But those statistics... and they're from rounded-down numbers! *Shiver.* I'd much rather pursue a lower-risk woman. A woman who actually takes marriage seriously. It's just too risky a proposition.

"American females just do not offer satisfactory or stable relationships!!

"It's a shame, because I know I'd make a great husband one day. I want a successful marriage, and there is a more than sixty-percent chance that the act of marrying an American woman will guarantee my marriage will not be successful... and furthermore, there will be a more than two-in-five chance that no matter how committed I am to the relationship, the woman will still try to bail-out on me at some point. Between her career aspirations, her need for independence and the fact that the average female American likes to regard males as uselessly redundant anyway- there is simply no room for a stable marriage within that kind of conflicted psyche.

"Yes, some countries have even higher divorce rates than those in the U.S. Some countries in the former Soviet Union have divorce rates in the high 60th percentiles... most of those countries, however, have experienced extreme levels of economic strife, social dislocation, political turmoil and heightened levels of crime. Naturally, there are many reasons to explain why families are under stress in places like the Ukraine and Belarus. But America is a society with a relatively functioning economy where public services aren't breaking-down left and right and where lawlessness isn't rampant... In short, women in the U.S. have no extreme circumstances that would put their families under such a huge amount of stress. So why are American women breaking-up their families in such numbers?

"I'm certain there are perfectly legitimate reasons for a woman to want to leave her husband... but is the man always necessarily the problem? I don't think anyone can ever get an honest answer as to why women divorce- women don't know how they reach their own conclusions half the time! But you can be sure that whatever her reasons, she will justify her divorce with X number of accusations; she will always have an excuse handy. She's feeling trapped in an unhappy relationship perhaps, or not enough of her needs were being met by her husband, or her husband spends too much time at work... Or sometimes women marry because they just want to have kids. Once the kids are raised, the man is of no further use and can be safely discarded. He's extraneous, as far as she's concerned.

"And you'll notice: whenever a divorced woman talks about her ex-husband, it's always unequivocally his fault that she decided to terminate the relationship. Her overweening belief in her own righteousness will start to bleed-through quite clearly. She will be able to gab on and on about whose fault it was (and it's never her). This all goes back to the whole issue of females despising accountability. Women would rather believe the flimsiest of manufactured excuses than even think that they might have had some responsibility for their divorces.

"Think about it: even if the woman planned the divorce, initiated it and carried it out, never does any responsibility for planning, initiating or carrying-out the decision ever fall on her shoulders. Or in some cases, she might make-up complete fabrications about the man abusing her and the kids; I know for a fact that some of the more crooked divorce lawyers secretly encourage their clients to do this. The man must always be the evildoer, and she the victim who needs help and sympathy. Not once will she admit things like: 'I found another man I liked more' or 'I was bored with the relationship.' Nay, it must be her no-good ex-husband's fault. That's how she terminates the marriage with a squeaky-clean conscience. They can not pity their ex-husbands; indeed their ex-husbands must always be the most horrible pigs on the planet. We don't want these poor women feeling guilty, do we?

"To make matters worse, the legal system gives the woman a financial incentive when she divorces. There are a huge number of greedy, opportunistic lawyers in America who earn their daily bread by stripping ex-husbands of their wealth. After your divorce, a huge hunk of your property and future earnings is basically considered up for grabs. And don't ever get behind in your monthly payments: over the last few years the federal government has been relentlessly chasing 'deadbeat dads' with a vengeance. Within marriage and outside of marriage, men are just walking wallets.

"And worst of all, many men find that after divorce they will lose contact with their children while still being obliged to support their ex-wives financially. About 85% of the children of divorce end-up in the custody of their mothers... and the few children in the custody of their fathers only became so after the father had spent thousands of dollars on legal fees trying to prove why they should be given custody. (In Journal of Marriage and the Family, J. A. Seltzer published a 1991 study called "Relationships between Fathers and Children Who Live Apart" which found that a third of children had seen their non-resident parent at most once in the previous year.) Doesn't this arrangement count as a type of involuntary servitude? Having a percentage of your income stripped-away from you to subsidize somebody else sounds a lot like a form of forced financial bondage, doesn't it? (And perhaps this is a question for law students, but doesn't the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution say: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except for punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States..."? So, is being an ex-husband supposed to be a crime now?)

"So, to sum-up: by marrying an American woman, there will be a more than 45% chance that, against your will, your marriage will end and you will lose contact with your kids... on top of it, you will be hounded by lawyers and required to support your (former) family financially. You've gotta be an idiot to take that kind of risk!!

"If love is blind, the American marriage has lost all five senses.

"As for you American guys: if you're a guy who gets personal satisfaction from making your woman happy, you've probably noticed that American women aren't happy for long, no matter what you do for them. (Have you ever been accused by your girlfriend of not showing enough affection when you've actually been exhausting yourself in a vain attempt to please her?) They'll always have another unquenched demand lying around. They always want you to buy them another useless and expensive gift... and they end-up dumping you because of what you can't give them. But naturally, you want the best girl you can get because you know you're a great person and you really have a sincere desire to to build a lasting and true relationship. If an American girl ever rejects you, be grateful she did it before you were married. Hell, she'd rather be with Mr. Asshole anyway. I say: if that's what she wants, let her be with Mr. Asshole!

"It's not a big secret that women have a huge amount of ability to command extralegal power and entitlements in the United States. In fact, it is women who set the general rules and conditions of the system of dating, mating and marriage that you must follow (their sex cartel for starters). One of the things that women need to perpetuate this arrangement is a hardworking yet quiescent and disposable population of males to follow their self-serving rules. So, why be quiescent?

"Divorce law is a system which is ruthless beyond the capacity of any single individual's resistance; it is a mean system designed to chew you-up and spit you out for the woman's exclusive benefit. You can't out-mean their system, don't even try. But you can out-think it, and there is safety in numbers. One of the things that you can do to make life uncomfortable for predatory women is not be quiescent before marriage. There are lots of ways of doing that; even just asking pointed questions to the woman you're dating can have an effect.

"But my main point is, one way to not be quiescent is to think about some numbers: American women represent 5% of the global population of women. Chances are, they're at the bottom 5% in terms of quality because they're probably sexist, self-centered and demanding as hell... and they will divorce you at least 45% of the time you marry them, guaranteed. With odds like that, you can't go wrong by looking abroad! Are you lowering your standards or selling-out? Absolutely not! By looking abroad, you're merely widening your search for the finest woman you can possibly find. It allows you to make better decisions.

"Or, if you're a real gambler and you're willing to risk marrying an American chick, at the very least insist on a prenuptial agreement and talk to a lawyer about what other divorce laws you should be aware of, for Gods' sake. If your fiancée refuses to sign a prenup like mine did, then you'll get an idea of why she's marrying you.

"You have the ability to say 'no' to the folderol that female Americans have set-up for you to swallow. And believe me, it is true folderol. You should always question their bullshit and refuse to accept their bullshit. And you can take comfort in the fact that you can just say 'no' and just walk away. Whatever an American woman might claim about herself, remember: she is probably unfit to be your wife."


kurt9 said...

I really think the purpose of marriage is to have kids. If you don't want kids, there is no reason to get married.

Robert What? said...

The problem also lies with the law. The law makes divorce essentially a no lose proposition for the woman. Men used to have property rights that would accrue to them if the woman wanted to eject from the marriage, including custody of the children. Now all the rights accrue to the woman and all the responsibilities accrue to the man. Until that changes back, if ever, the situation will continue to deteriorate

TroperA said...

I've been watching some old TV. There was an episode of the Honeymooners where Ralph Kramden got laid off and he was mortified that his wife had to get a job to keep them afloat. He became even more upset when he learned that she was working in an office filled with handsome men. The second the layoff was over, Ralph ended his wife's employment.

You see, to the men of the past, having a wife get a job was not only a sign of their failure as a provider, it was also a possible route to a marriage breakup. When women's incomes no longer became tied to their husband's, the marriage bond became a lot more fragile. Add no-fault divorce into the mix and you have an institution that's effectively dead.

Marriage was always about a two-way transfer between men and women. Men provided women with their surplus income, and women provided men with the means to reproduce. Now that women can either earn their own income or extract the income from their husbands/babydaddys without having to provide anything in return, the contract is broken. Concubinage (a loose sexual contract that is entirely dependent on the continued romantic feelings of the participants) has effectively replaced marriage. This is why arguments against "gay marriage" have become ineffective--since gays have freely engaged in concubine relationships since the beginning of time, transforming marriage into concubinage has made it possibly for gays to "marry".

Interestingly, the institution of concubinage long ago tended to favor the richer party, the male. Now it favors the party that can extract the most resources from it--the female.

CpC said...

Let's look at the idea of marriage in a positive light. You as a American male wish to be married and what are the odds that you will have a positive and rewarding life.
First, 50% or better of the marriages in the U.S. end in divorce.
Next, about 25% of the American males in marriage to an American woman will die prematurely (heart attacks, strokes, suicide). The primary reason being the pressure exert on them by their loving and caring wives and society's expectations of always producing and bringing in more and more money for the wife to spend on crap.
That leaves the final 25% of American males married to that special snow flake. How many of this group can honestly say at their retirement they had a rewarding and positive life thru marriage to an American princess? How many stay in a soul crushing marriage because of the children, inertia, or the princess realized that she possessed no SMV and MMV and you were the best she could have?
So, looking at marriage in a positive light, what are the odds of having a happy and rewarding marriage, it would probably fall in the 8-10% range. So, would you invest your money in endeavor that had a 8% chance of returning a positive result? 8 out of 100. One in twelve and half. I doubt it.

Anonymous said...

These days, an American shouldn't risk marriage unless the vow is so sacred to him that he's willing to endure jail time for it. Before my wedding, I told my fiancee point-blank, "If you go insane and turn into a completely different person and try to divorce me, I will happily go to prison before I pay you one solitary nickel of alimony or child support". I absolutely meant every word of it, and still do.

Nobody seems to realize that swearing an oath with the words "'Til death do us part" means you're actually putting your life on the line, like the U.S. Secret Service or the Swiss Guards. These days, though, being a husband is a much more dangerous profession than either of these... hence the dearth of recruits.

Omega Man said...

This is the reality that many men in our time face. The manosphere, which you often rail against, is a reaction against precisely this sort of abuse. It's an abuse which women can and do inflict on men at will and without any hint of a conscience on their part.
I would agree with you that the manosphere is still floundering a bit, but then what else can a man do in such a misandrist society as ours?

Robert What? said...

Alice Kramden was potrayed as - above all else - loyal to Ralph. Today that would be much harder to find.

Unknown said...

"The manosphere, which you often rail against, is a reaction against precisely this sort of abuse."

How many times have I said that? 20?

Anonymous said...

The truth hurts , American women (westernized Americanized wasp western euro decent women) in general are insecure , selfish , self-centered , materialistic , mean spirited , fake , angry , unhappy , low-self-esteem , gold diggers, manipulative , conniving , sexually repressed and totally Un-liberated, and play to many head games...

Eastern European women make them look like fools and a total joke….Eastern European women are way more beautiful and are way more liberated than these totally sexually repressed wasp westernized American women….

that about covers it. FACT! 101! – Let the games begin.