Some years ago I was told, "If you couldn't fuck women and have kids by them, there would be a bounty on them." Which reminded me of a comment by Homer Simpson: "Why couldn't God find someone else for us to marry besides women!?"
Think about what that means: if men couldn't love women, they'd be worthless except for having babies. All the things men have done for women, they wouldn't do. And women can't do those things themselves - create, discover, invent, repair. To quote Camille Paglia, without men they'd still be living in grass huts.
Everything men have done for women, they have done, ultimately out of love. Without love, women would be up the proverbial creek without a paddle.
If women had any sense and understood these things, they'd overflowing with gratitude and appreciation. Instead, they're eaten up with envy of men - and that is exactly what feminism is. Leftist, envious, desiring, to paraphrase Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, to "murder the Father." Even if they destroy themselves.
That's what envy does - "I'll bring you down even if I destroy myself!" And loveless, envious women are just big babies. Not big children, as Schopenhauer suggested, but big infants - hate-filled, raging, loveless.
You can't be envious and feel gratitude at the same time. You'll find that wisdom as far back as Aesop and such folk tales as "Snow White," in which the Evil Queen says, "I'll destroy her even if I die."
Women in general are far more envious than men. That, again, is why feminism is leftist, and again, leftism is based on envy.
Can the envious love? I see no evidence of that. Gratitude, appreciation, love, yes. Envy and no gratitude? Then there cannot be love.
I wonder where all this is going to lead? Envious, ungrateful women, trying to destroy men...so men are withdrawing and not loving women, instead denigrating them as whores, users, and abusers.
Men are now wising up to what women are doing - and someday women will realize just now dependent they are on men - which is 100%.