Why does the federal government do this? One reason is that corporations, themselves creations of the state, want cheap workers and have enough political influence to get their way.
Another reason is that there are leftists who just want to destroy the country. Perhaps they think, as all leftists think, that once existing institutions are destroyed all the inherent “goodness” in human nature will pop up and create a utopia. Apparently they think all people are the same, including low-IQ foreign populations.
I suppose they think all of people of the world, with their 80 IQS, will be united in their material love of SUVs and Blu-Ray players, and peace will reign for all. That's just plain retarded.
Or perhaps everyone will accept everyone else's religion? The War Nerd had it right: when different tribes share the same land, the result historically has been genocide.
I agree with a comment made by the late Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn: leftists don’t merely misunderstand human nature. They don’t understand it at all. And a lot of "libertarians" are in reality leftists.
Human nature is terribly flawed, and civilization is a thin film on top of a whole lot of badness. Destroying that thin film doesn’t create a utopia. It creates a hell.
Under a purely libertarian society, all property would be private. Contrary to the belief the borders would be open, the truth is the exact opposite. There would not be mass migration, because the landowners would not stand for it.
Occasionally libertarians tell me, "Well, immigrants would pay to cross the property." Oh, really? Where are millions of poor immigrants going to get the money to pay for such a thing? It also assumes the owners place money above all. The only people I've seen do that are people who don't have any money. People who have money have other priorities.
Do the defenders of open borders think thousands of landowners are going to spend the night wandering around their property with a flashlight (and a shotgun?), catching immigrants and charging them a dollar? And that immigrants are going to carry thousands of dollars in cash, to pay the landowners whose property they have to cross?
I also get the comment (actually a mantra, and a clichéd one at that), "I should be able to hire whom I want." True. But how are those potential hirees going to get there, when they have to cross other's property and the owners won’t let them?
Do the defenders of open borders really think thousands if not millions of people will allow mass migration across their private property? What sort of bizarre self-deception is that, to believe such a thing?
I’ve been told, “They’ll use the interstate highway system.” The interstates are a creation of the federal government, were first started in 1956, and the purpose was for the transportation of the federal military.
No federal government, no interstates.
For that matter, anarcho-libertarians believe in no government at all. If all property was private, how would roads ever get built? Or are all roads supposed to look like a maze instead of being straight, in order to find landowners who will allow roads to be built on their property?
When I use these points in arguments with open-borders libertarians, I can see the pain in their faces, then their brains shut down. They cannot accept the fact not only does "libertarianism" not support open borders, it completely opposes them.
If all property is private, there will be no mass immigration.
I have come to the conclusion that there will always be government. And I am not so naïve as to not understand that governments grow and grow and sooner or later always get out of hand. That is an eternal problem.
The problem, as always, is how to keep government under control. To that, I have no answer. Neither does anyone else. But I know getting rid of government completely is no answer at all.
Anarchy is chaos - which is what no government invariably leads to. And chaos creates nothing but crime. It creates hell.
What am I supposed to think, when libertarians who claim to despise the federal government above all, support policies that can only exist because of that same government?