Welfare to Men Only?

Our modern society, via government policy, is attempting to make men (specifically fathers) optional. That's bizarre, to put it mildly. Because it's married men with children who are the bedrock of society. Without them society goes down the tubes

Not that all surprisingly, PUAs/cads couldn't really exist without modern technology, which allows such an extensive culture (through fast travel) and also the ability to escape the consequence of what they do by running away.

How what would happen if struggling men got welfare and women got none? Chew on that for a while (I'll give you a hint: women are already 100% dependent on men but don't know it; without welfare (including Affirmative Action) they'd know it. And be shocked.

This is from VDARE.

Via @charlesmurray, at West Hunter anthropologist Henry Harpending writes:

Briefly we are likely to find dad males/coy females in ecological situations where male labor and resources are critical for successful reproduction. Think of labor-intensive agriculture, European peasants and Asian farmers, as examples. In the United States in the past, “working class” meant stable mated pairs who together provisioned and cared for children. An archetype of working class in American television was Archie Bunker.

Social organization with cad males and fast females is found prominently among tropical gardeners where women provide most of the food for themselves and their children as well as for the men, who are often just parasites on the women. The euphemism in economics for these societies is “female farming systems”. These share many characteristics with our industrial “underclass” in which women have no ecological force pushing them into long term stable pair bonds.

Notice that in each of the above descriptions there are two hands clapping: in cad/fast social systems neither a coy female nor a dad male does very well while in dad/coy systems neither a fast females nor a cad male does very well. The two polar social types are deeply rooted in contemporary politics. The zany feminism of the 1980s (“a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle”) precisely advocated the cad/fast setup. Our religious right with its chatter about “the natural family” and “stable marriages” and the like pushes hard for a dad/coy world.

Back to our our social engineers who know biology. They share a goal of a society in which dad males mate with coy females because children enjoy the care and security of a stable home and streets safe from gunfire. The new policy is simple: welfare payments are to be given only to males.

Henry promises an upcoming post with details on how to make this work.