Monday, October 24, 2016

Women Lie All the Time

"You've got to change your evil ways, baby" - Santana

I have mentioned before that when I was 16 years old I was standing on a street corner walking back to high school after lunch. I had some school books in my hand.

A pudgy, plain, middle-aged woman driving a car gave me a dirty look, reached over and locked her door while at a stoplight by me. That’s the only time that’s ever happened to me. That’s why I remember it.

I ignored the whole thing, but I remember thinking something along the lines of "What a nut. She's deluding herself if she thinks I'm going to do anything to her." I had hair down past my shoulders and apparently she thought I was some sort of drooling, drug-addicted rapist who’d force myself into her car, hold my Swiss army knife to her throat and then have my evil ways with her.

Years later, after much more experience with disturbed women, I realized that in order to successfully lie to others you first of all have to lie to yourself.

Ask any police officer how many women lie to them, with a straight face, about rape.

I've caught more than one woman lying about sexual harassment. As I've said, "Hell has no fury like a woman scorned, even if they have to make up the whole thing."

Think about that nutty lying woman dragging her mattress around campus, the mattress she claimed she was raped upon. She was a scorned woman and was lying about the whole thing, just as was the woman who claimed she was gang-raped at a fraternity party (and "Rolling Stone" magazine would have never run that story if the female reporter hadn’t first conned herself into believing such blatant lies).

Men lie too, of course, but why is it women are always the ones who lie about men and sex? And their lies are so easy to see through?

Can you imagine a man dragging a mattress around in public? I can't. He’d be ridiculed and mocked up one side and down the other.

Because women lie all the time I have to give Donald Trump the benefit of the doubt. Why did these women wait ten to 35 years to go public with these accusations? He shoved his hand under my dress and fiddled with my mommy parts before he even knew my name? And in public on an airplane?

I'm sure Trump gets hit on all the time by women (I doubt this happens to Bill Gates). Trump’s not only a multi-billionaire but a celebrity. And nutty women desire celebrity, otherwise why did Mattress Girl and Fraternity Girl lie about what happened to them?

It's women who are the ones always watching the celebrity gossip shows and reading the magazines. Brad and Angelina! Only women are concerned about such things, not men.

Can you imagine a fat unattractive woman like Oprah Winfrey being popular among men? Or the masculine, unattractive Wendy Williams?

Women are nosy, envious, ungrateful self-deceptive little beasts. Not every individual woman of course but as a group they are.

This has been noticed for thousands of years. Look how nosy Pandora stuck in nose into something that was none of her business and unleashed every evil into the world.

Or look at the envy and self-deception and ingratitude of Eve.

Such stories would not have survived for thousands of years if there was not a great deal of truth in them.

There is a good reason women were not allowed to vote for a long time. Men in those days knew things about them that we have mostly forgotten.

It reminds me of something my niece told me many years ago: men are stupid and women are evil.

And men are stupid because they listen to women.

Saturday, October 22, 2016

Yes, the Media is Rigged

The MSM's idea of diversity is that their members look different but think the same. They’re infected with liberalism. To them anything else is not just illegitimate but twisted and evil.

I have mentioned I have a degree in Journalism. In college I found almost all of journalism students were apolitical but those that weren't were leftist, which meant they thought they were always right and that those who disagreed weren't merely mistaken but bad people. Nazis, you know.

They could never answer an argument, ran away, then stewed about their defeat. They were also big into revenge.

There was a lot of childishness about all of them.

Now as to why they were leftist I’m not sure, except they think their feels make their opinions fact. And leftists operate on their feels although they think it’s reason.

Because they think their opponents are evil, they think this gives them the right to physically attack them, commit voter fraud and try to steal elections. Fascist and Nazi scum, so attack them and keep them out office! And hope they die off!

Now imagine these people taking over the media. Don’t imagine, but instead just look around.

Since they think everyone should think as they do they don't believe in competition.

Merely listening to competing arguments really upsets them. Their brains ain’t right in the first place, otherwise they wouldn’t be leftists.

They also think their words change reality, hence the chanting that Hillary has already won so Trump should withdraw from the race.

For quite a while I was hearing that bloggers on the Internet weren't "real" journalists. I don't see that anymore because the Internet has become so influential and the influence of the MSM is dwindling.

The MSM has become a liberal special-interest group, nothing more.

The Internet has decentralized the media and decentralism of anything is always a good thing.

And the more advertising pulls out of the MSM - which is what supports them - the better it is for the people of the United States.

Friday, October 21, 2016

The Bestowal of an Unwanted Self Leads to Feelings of Shame and Humiliation

In my last article I mentioned I encountered an unattractive girl in high school while walking to a party, and she looked at me with fear in her eyes. She probably thought I was going sneer at her or make fun of her.

I realized years later she must have felt shame and humiliation because of her looks and the fact she was ignored by all the boys at school. People such as that are exceptionally susceptible to being ridiculed.

Then I wrote just about ten years later I knew a beautiful woman who was asked out by one weekend by seven guys. The first ostracized; the second had more guys than she knew what to do with. And all because of their looks.

That wasn't the only thing I encountered in that studio apartment having to with women and their looks.

One night I was in another girl's room listening to records (this was decades before CDs).

This woman was very attractive.

She told me that when she was 12 years old she had been ostracized by the kids in school. She showed me her picture from seventh grade. She was pudgy and wore glasses that sat crooked on her face.

Over the summer she lost all the extra weight and got contacts. When she went back to school in the fall all the kids who had ignored and ostracized her now wanted to be her friend, because she had been one of those Ugly Ducklings that turned into a Swan.

No thanks, she told me.

She had been shamed and humiliated and now she was the center of attention. The experience changed her permanently.

She told me ever since then she had never been attracted to what most women considered good-looking guys.

She said she was attracted to men who looked like Peter Noone.

"Who's Peter Noone?" I asked.

The lead singer for Herman and the Hermits, she told me.

Peter Noone was popular about the time she was born. How it happened she found him attractive I have no idea.

But I do know about a year after I graduated I saw her at a PR function in a town about 50 miles away. She was with her new husband, who - you guessed it - looked like Peter Noone, except about five inches taller.

I have thought about this for a long time. When people have an unwanted self bestowed on them by others they generally feel shame and humiliation.

Of course they try to replace those feeling of shame and humiliation with pride. Kathy did it by ignoring all the good-looking guys and going her own way. It's true - living well really is the best revenge. And Kathy got her revenge.

I also mentioned before I've seen a lot more women try to shame and humiliate men, including men they didn't know and had never met before, than men who try to humiliate women.

I've only seen one guy try to humiliate a women, and that was a black guy who abused in public a yellow-skinned mulatto women in who only dated white guys and had a little girl who passed for white. I'm sure he was driven insane by the fact she would never have anything to do with his ugly self (this woman also made more that one comment about my blue eyes - and the father of the child had blue eyes).

The difference between men and women is that when men feel shame and humiliation they often try to replace those feelings with pride by violence.

The Manosphere exists because of the abuse of men by women, specifically women infected by feminist ideas.

It tries to build men's self-esteem by telling them women are inferior, i.e. loveless hypergamous whores, things only interested in "cash and prizes," so get revenge on them by using them as "plates" to be spun. Don’t be one of those grotesque Betas or Gammas!

Also be a "Dark Triad Alpha," too. Bad advice all around. Very bad advice.

Feminism tries to bestow an unwanted, shamed, humiliated self on men. So, of course, these men are seeking revenge.

If feminism had never existed there would be no Manosphere.

Thursday, October 20, 2016

People of Little or No Value

By value I mean the value other people assign to them.

When I was 16 years old I was walking to a party about a mile from my house. I encountered a girl I went to high school with. She was walking her dog, on a Friday or Saturday night while I was going to a party.

She wasn't good-looking at all. She was pudgy and even without the pudge she would not have had a good body. And she wasn't attractive at all in the face.

She recognized me, just as I recognized her.

She gave me a look of fear. I wondered, why? Did she think I was going attack her? Most probably not. Most probably she thought I was going to say something nasty to her because of her appearance.

I forget what I did. Maybe I said hi to her. Maybe not. I don't remember.

Later I thought, "She's not of any value to anyone." I'm sure she was of value to her parents, but at high school, no.

I've always remembered that one-minute encounter.

In college I started encountering people who were of no value to anyone, male and female. They spent their weekends alone in their rooms, watching TV.

My last year and a half in college I lived in a studio apartment attached to a two-story house. One evening I was in one girl's room, and this girl verged on being beautiful. She was putting on her make-up while looking in a mirror.

For some reason, out of the blue, I asked her how many guys had asked her out that weekend. I wasn’t even serious.

"Seven," she answered.

I was speechless. I had no idea what to say. Seven? I think my mouth even dropped open.

If seven women had ever asked me out I would have thought it was an elaborate, cruel practical joke.

The difference between the girl walking her dog and the one putting on her make-up was based on one thing only - looks.

I have almost never seen a man be nasty to a woman. Once, I can remember. I have seen many women be nasty to men, including men they don't even know. A dozen times.

I can only conclude these women think these men are of little value, otherwise these women wouldn't treat them like that.

From that I can extrapolate there are a noticeable number of women today who think many men are of little value. I find that odd since men created and maintain society. Women can't do either.

The Manosphere is obsessed with "how to be a high-value man." Its prescriptions are in many ways nonsense and in fact dangerous, since they include such words as "psychopath" and "Dark Triad."

Yet I never encounter anything about the most important things that people want - to be appreciated and respected. To be considered as having some value. To not be ignored or abused. To have meaning, importance and community.

When people have an unwanted self bestowed on them they usually end up feeling shamed and humiliated, like the girl walking her dog. I've always wondered what happened to her.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Trump is Adolescent But Hillary Clinton is an Evil Child

"The evil man is the child grown strong" - Thomas Hobbes

I heard Melania Trump say she had two children in her family - her son and her husband. I started laughing.

Trump does come across as adolescent - the rating of women by looks, the hairspray keeping his ridiculous haircut in place. That's high school, even middle school.

Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, comes across sociopathic - an evil child. She shows no guilt or remorse, is entitled, sees people as things to serve her, devalues them as "deplorables," curses and insults them, flies into rages.

I figure all politicians are immature, otherwise they wouldn't be politicians.

In other ways Trump comes across as fatherly, although it's closer to Fred Flintstone than Ward Cleaver. Clinton just comes across as an Evil Queen Wannabe and not motherly at all.

But it's looking like our coming election is between a billionaire adolescent and a destructive child.

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Morons with Credentials

After I graduated college I got a job as the editor of a small weekly newspaper.

The paper was owned by a medium-sized daily that was located in the county seat. And this was in southwestern Illinois, which is pretty much Nowheresville.

It was an eye-opening experience. I was raised blue-collar middle-class and knew nothing about this kind of corruption. I knew about other kinds but not this.

The editor of the daily was a lawyer and a graduate of Yale. The publisher had an MBA from the University of Michigan.

I thought, “What the hell are these people doing here?”

Their jobs weren’t hard and local people could have done them. But local people were never hired for the top jobs and never stood a chance of getting them.

That’s when I realized there really is an Old Boy’s Network. It doesn’t mean the members are qualified. The best jobs were reserved for the Unqualified Upper Crust.

The MBA in particular was unqualified. He was a second-rater and second-raters hire third-raters and then those third-raters hire fourth-raters.

The whole place was pretty much a catastrophe – and all because the MBA from the University of Michigan didn’t know what the hell he was doing.

The MBA finally "retired" - which means forced out - when another corporation bought the paper and MBA was replaced by a man who used to drive a truck. I'm sure the business is much better-run these days.

Probably the worst thing the MBA did was hire a Castastrophe that he not only hired but defended.

The Catastrophe was caught engaging in some sort of sexual activity on company property. And he was cheating on his wife.

Something like that is immediate dismissal, no appeal. The Big Guns in New York were going to fire the Catastrophe but the MBA talked them out of it.

Still, the Catastrophe was so bad at eveything that the Big Guns were finally forced to lateral him out of state to downtown St. Louis. I think altogether it took seven years to get rid of this POS.

Many jobs require worthless credentials. It takes a degree to teach children? You can train a teacher in six weeks. As for newspapers, remember Jimmy Olson, cub reporter? The last time there were cub reporters was in the '50s.

I graduated from what used to be a teacher's college and was appalled at the stupidity of the education students.

My father was a high-school dropout and started and ran his own successful construction firm. And he first started out as a cub carpenter.

We need more people starting at the bottom and working their way up. Degrees? Many of them are worthless.

Monday, October 17, 2016

It’s Homogamy Not Hypergamy

”Only when like marries like can there be any happiness” - Gerald O’Hara, Gone With the Wind

Now why is it the Manosphere knows made-up words such as “hypergamy” but does not know accepted scholarly words like “homogamy”? Aren’t they interested in the truth instead of false, clear and easy-to-understand fantasies? It doesn’t appear so.

Where are the hundreds of decades-long studies by qualified scholars about “hypergamy”? There aren’t any. But there about homogamy.

Homogamy means “like marries like.” It’s the only way to have a chance at any happiness in a relationship. And scholars have found homogamy applies to 100% of relationships (I have mentioned an Aesop’s fable, thousands of years old, about how “Equals make the best friends.” They also make the best marriages.).

Homogamy is another word for “associative mating.” Every study ever done has proven the truth of associative mating.

There is even a 25% chance of a couple having the same eye color, which is statistically significant.

One of the biggest predictors of associative mating is having similar IQs. People with similar IQs get married and have children.

Someone with an IQ of 125 is not going to marry someone with an IQ of 85 and have children with them (as I’ve mentioned before, the functionally-illiterate moron “Muhammad Ali” had an IQ of 78 – and your IQ is set by the time you’re 12).

Not only does smart marry smart but dumb marries dumb, so with the latter we end up with dysgenic pressures.

Even with regression to the mean a couple with IQs each of 125 are most probably not going children with the average IQ of 100. Their children’s IQs will be substantially higher.

This means we are going to have socioeconomic classes sorted by IQ, which is already happening. And people with higher IQs generally make more money. And people with lower IQs make a lot less.

As funny as the movie is we are not going to end up with Idiocracy. We’re going to end up with a famous science fiction story known as “The Marching Morons,” in which 90% of people were morons and ten percent of the people had all the brains and had to take care of everyone – until that ten percent killed all of the morons by shooting them into space.

This time they’ll die when it gets to the point the white man can no longer support their sorry asses.

Honestly, what would happen if we had ten percent smart productive people and 90% morons? Would we end up like the movie Elysium, with the smarter ones living in a space station and the earth swarming with morons? Art does imitate life.

The problems associated with low IQs are appalling. Crime, welfare, unemployment, illegitimate births – all are associated with below-average IQs. That’s what happens when dumb marries dumb and has children.

One of the problems associated with a high socioeconomic level is putting off having children until the late 20s or early 30s. So smarter people have fewer children or sometimes none at all.

And these days the divorce rate is close to astronomical, compared to what it was 50 years ago.

Another problem – and this is going to be a huge one – is that when women move into a field men move out of it. That’s why there are so few male grade school teachers – and when I was a kid most of my teachers were men, including a former Marine when I was 11 years old.

Now by law women have to be hired over men. I’ve seen that several times – women, of whatever race, hired over more qualified men. It’s even happened to friends of mine.

One of my friends lost out on a job teaching economics to a far-less-qualified woman. When he sat in on her class he found she making mathematical mistakes on the blackboard. He told me he’s seen that twice with unqualified women.

I know one man who had been an officer in the military and who had an M.S. When he looked at the promotion list at work he found every one of them was a woman – eight white women, once black, one “Latina” (whatever the hell that is).

Another wanted to teach law but was told by the dean he didn’t have a chance because he was a white man and only women were hired. Like anyone would listen to Hillary Clinton or Michelle Obama teaching law (by the way, when Michelle Obama became First Lady her $300,000 a year make-work job at a hospital was eliminated).

What this means is that schooled (not educated) high-IQ women are going to look around and find there aren’t enough men for them. There are more women with college degrees than men.

And importing Third Worlders with average IQs with 89 isn’t going to help at all and instead going to hurt, and badly. Such people cannot function in our advanced society and will only bring crime and degradation.

People are more concerned with breeding dogs than better people.

People aren’t blank slates (John Locke actually said “wax tablets”). About half of what we are is genetic. Even if it’s less that’s still a hell of a lot of genetic influence.

Leftists think everything is environmental even though they don’t live with crime-ridden lower-IQs types, which shows what hypocrites they are.

We’re going to end up with wealthier people with higher IQs living in gated communities, usually in the hills and all the crime-ridden, poverty-stricken people with lower IQs living in ghettos in the valleys.

My hometown, in a valley, is turning minority so crime is skyrocketing (it’s near E. St. Louis, Illinois, which at one time was an all-white party town and is now an all-black slum. In 30 years my hometown is going to be a slum. And one of my friends has moved to the crime-free neighborhood in the foothills of a small mountain in New Mexico.

That has been the history of the world.

We’re looking at the Orcs taking over unless we put a stop to it. That’s what happens dumb marries dumb and overwhelms us with their moronic offspring.