"Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven" - "Paradise Lost," John Milton
Divorce is right at 50%, I believe. And about 70% of men between 20 and 34 are not married. And we're not at replacement rate.
I don't think the problem is all that hard: men are being treated unfairly. What's truly odd are those who think it's not true. You know - "patriarchy" and "male privilege" and "white privilege." I just gape at these people. Just how deluded are they? Pretty damn deluded, I'd say.
Samuel Johnson, hundreds of years ago, made this comment: "Nature has given women so much power that the law has very wisely given them little." (Every man - and woman - should memorize this saying.)
Now the law is far too tilted toward favoring women.
Women have the babies so they are indispensable. Men, on the other hand, as Carl Jung noticed, are culturally indispensable, since they created everything.
Unfortunately, since the reigning paradigm is "equality," it pretends women are as culturally indispensable as men....while denying that men are the ones who are culturally indispensable.
So what we are getting is women withdrawing from having babies (including aborting them) while men are withdrawing from creating and maintaining culture.
Men are still supposed to support women in all ways but in what ways are women supporting men? When I look around I can't see any ways in which women in general support men. I certainly don't see any respect or gratitude.
Egalitarianism and democracy are feminine qualities. Aristocracy is masculine. But if everyone is supposed to be equal there can be no aristocracy!
But it's the aristocracy (and the freedom the aristocracy believes in) that advances society (and by aristocracy I mean such men as Nikolai Tesla, Isaac Newton, Adam Smith - the ones who create, maintain and advance culture).
So how can you have democracy and liberty at the same time? You can't.
Erik von Keuhnelt-Leddihn once wrote that all aristocrats are anarchists. He's right about that.
When the law is fair, the more quality men become liberty-loving aristocrats who follow their interests, who create, discover and invent and therefore advance society (I've always been amused about the Manosphere's delusions about what a "high-quality" man is).
There is always going to be tension between women's fascist/socialist delusions, their desire for security and fear of freedom - and men's desire to be free.
To everyone's detriment, the first is now enshrined in law and the second is dying. Which means liberty shrinks and inventions, discoveries and even the maintaining of civilization goes backwards. And socialism and fascism advance.
If women ruled society would be a Hell. It's turning into one right now.