Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Welfare to Men Only?

Our modern society, via government policy, is attempting to make men (specifically fathers) optional. That's bizarre, to put it mildly. Because it's married men with children who are the bedrock of society. Without them society goes down the tubes

Not that all surprisingly, PUAs/cads couldn't really exist without modern technology, which allows such an extensive culture (through fast travel) and also the ability to escape the consequence of what they do by running away.

How what would happen if struggling men got welfare and women got none? Chew on that for a while (I'll give you a hint: women are already 100% dependent on men but don't know it; without welfare (including Affirmative Action) they'd know it. And be shocked.

This is from VDARE.


Via @charlesmurray, at West Hunter anthropologist Henry Harpending writes:

Briefly we are likely to find dad males/coy females in ecological situations where male labor and resources are critical for successful reproduction. Think of labor-intensive agriculture, European peasants and Asian farmers, as examples. In the United States in the past, “working class” meant stable mated pairs who together provisioned and cared for children. An archetype of working class in American television was Archie Bunker.

Social organization with cad males and fast females is found prominently among tropical gardeners where women provide most of the food for themselves and their children as well as for the men, who are often just parasites on the women. The euphemism in economics for these societies is “female farming systems”. These share many characteristics with our industrial “underclass” in which women have no ecological force pushing them into long term stable pair bonds.

Notice that in each of the above descriptions there are two hands clapping: in cad/fast social systems neither a coy female nor a dad male does very well while in dad/coy systems neither a fast females nor a cad male does very well. The two polar social types are deeply rooted in contemporary politics. The zany feminism of the 1980s (“a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle”) precisely advocated the cad/fast setup. Our religious right with its chatter about “the natural family” and “stable marriages” and the like pushes hard for a dad/coy world.

Back to our our social engineers who know biology. They share a goal of a society in which dad males mate with coy females because children enjoy the care and security of a stable home and streets safe from gunfire. The new policy is simple: welfare payments are to be given only to males.

Henry promises an upcoming post with details on how to make this work.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Where is the article link?

Bob Wallace said...

Fixed.

LosAngelesKing said...

"How what would happen if struggling men got welfare and women got none? Chew on that for a while (I'll give you a hint: women are already 100% dependent on men but don't know it; without welfare (including Affirmative Action) they'd know it. And be shocked."

Well now, that's an interesting proposition Bob. With all the screaming shrikes weeping, wailing, and gnashing their teeth about how hard it is to be a woman, i'd like to see how they would like having to support US for a few generations. LOL. Of course, they'll be in for a nasty surprise, but won't ever admit it though.

If there is one thing I have learned about the female species in my life, it's that they loathe being wrong, and they hate admitting it even more.

Bob Wallace said...

Jung commented women's greatest flaw was thinking they were always right and they would never be happy until they gave it up.

LosAngelesKing said...

"Jung commented women's greatest flaw was thinking they were always right"

I told my dad that once (about women always thinking they're right. He just kind of rolled his eyes and said "Yup." My mom was standing beside him and didn't say anything...probably because she knew it was true. Last summer, my pops and I were repairing their backyard deck and my mom was trying to tell us that maybe we should be doing things differently. I think that's one of those things that drive men crazy about the women. Their thinking they're always right. LOL.

Pride, like envy, is woman's original sin.

Mindstorm said...

I agree with exposed premises, but not necessarily with proposed solutions. I like a guaranteed low/non-interest loan better than simply giving money away. People unable to pay their debts are better off not reproducing.

Anonymous said...

My father once told me. "Son, all women are crazy. Your job is to find one who's less crazy, marry her and then plant a smile on your face while you wait for the sweet embrace of death."