Why, in God's name, would any man want anything to do with a rude, unpleasant woman? What retard actually thinks she testing him for his fitness? Talk about a complete misunderstanding of Evo-Pysch, which isn't even a science anyway. Clearly the supporters of these concepts have no understanding of what a hypothesis is, or a theory. As for the null hypothesis, forget it.
How can anyone truly believe that in a woman's genes are the instructions, "I shall shit test men to see if they are sufficiently Alpha to prove that they are good breeding material." Uh huh, right.
The comedian Gallagher made more sense when he said that ON SALE is in a woman's genes.
I, have found, on the other hand, that if you can make a woman laugh you are in. Not surprisingly, many woman have told me that.
What it is about is having fun. If she has fun with you, and laugh, that works.
I have never in my life had a woman "shit-test" me. Actually, the rude, unpleasant women I have known have had their relationships with men not work out, so they blame all their problems on men. Since they think they are right and men are wrong, they get self-righteous and hostile. They apparently don't understand that no man wants anything to do with a woman who isn't any fun, or doesn't appreciate him, or feel any gratitude.
It's amazing how many people uncritically imitate each other. They apparently lack the analytical ability to see even obvious flaws in ideas. It's actually quite scary - or more like creepy.
It's like they're tape recorders - "I-believe-in-Alpha-Beta-Gamma-click-click-click-Dark-Triad-Shit-Tests-Negs-click-click-cick." Oh, yeah, that's creepy alright.
Guys who believe in these goofy Manosphere concepts are going to end up wondering, "Is she shit-testing me? No, wait, maybe she's just an unpleasant bitch who blames all her problems on men...and I see in her future psychiatric medication and buying Fancy Feast (fish favor!) for Mittens."