Monday, October 20, 2014

What Are We Supposed to do About Women's Destructive Envy of Men, Which Will Collapse Civilization?

Leftism is the Bad Feminine, which means feminism is the Bad Feminine, and destroying society means destroying men, i.e. the "patriarchy." If anything, it's based on the envy of men? Why?

Perhaps because men created everything, and maybe on some level women know this. And the envious want to destroy those they envy, even if they destroy themselves. So, leftist, feminist women will destroy men even if they destroy themselves, and civilization. Because they are completely, 100% dependent on men, who created everything.

They bite the hand that feeds them.

Or, as my poster, Days of Broken Arrows, put it:

"People resent those on whom they depend. That's why teens resent their parents. No one likes to feel they need to be 'taken care of.' It makes them feel helpless. We like to be independent.

"Women know, on some deep subconscious level, that they owe their survival to the world that was built and is maintained by men. You can give them all the power positions in the world and dress them up in pantsuits and heels, but it's the men who built what they'll be running.

"If all the men went on strike tomorrow, we'd have power outages, looting, etc. and society would cease to function. They write about 'the end of men,' but 'the end of civilization' is what would happen if there really was an 'end of men.'

"They don't teach this in school. And the media can't say this for fear of backlash or being called 'sexist.' Women know we can't tell them this truth out loud -- much like kids know when parents can't tell them certain things. Some women resent this. Those are the ones of whom you speak.

"It's not a matter of 'having fun.' By becoming the Junior Anti-Sex League, women wish to strip men of their humanity and a large part of their reason for existing. This is why the societies before ours limited their rights -- they knew women contributed little but created lots of drama.

"We have to learn that lesson again and we'll probably have to do it the hard way."


The French have a word for this: "ressentiment."

Wikipedia defines it thus: "...in philosophy and psychology, is one of the forms of resentment or hostility. It is the French word for 'resentment' (fr. Latin intensive prefix 're', and 'sentir' 'to feel'). Ressentiment is a sense of hostility directed at that which one identifies as the cause of one's frustration, that is, an assignment of blame for one's frustration. The sense of weakness or inferiority and perhaps jealousy in the face of the 'cause' generates a rejecting/justifying value system, or morality, which attacks or denies the perceived source of one's frustration. The ego creates an enemy in order to insulate itself from culpability."

In other words, "It's your fault, not mine, and I hate and resent you for the power I think you have over me, so I want to bring you down, even if I bring myself down, too."

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

This ends with women losing most of their rights. It may happen in this society or in the next after this one falls, but it will happen.

Anders said...

Straight up scorched earth, man. Raze it like Carthage. Bitches wanna bring me down, fine. I'll take them all down with me and we will all burn together.

earl said...

Men produces the things that run and maintain those things.

We all know the one thing women produce for society.

More humans.

Which is honorable in itself when humanity was seen as a good thing. Sadly, that is not the case anymore.

Anonymous said...

Earl: "Men produces the things that run and maintain those things. We all know the one thing women produce for society. More humans. Which is honorable in itself when humanity was seen as a good thing. Sadly, that is not the case anymore."

This really gets to the heart of the problem. Someone, somewhere decided that women should be men and it's been problems ever since. Who decided producing a nurturing humans was a less worthy endeavor than building a society for those humans? Bad idea whoever it was.

When it comes to achieving equality, I'm reminded of that old Rush song "Trees," even though it apparently was written about something else.

Thanks for giving me credit for my idea -- doesn't happen often lately.

-- Days of Broken Arrows

Robert What? said...

It is ironically humorous to hear women talk of "Male Privilege". What MP used to be are certain perks that society afforded men in exchange for the enormous sacrifice of being responsible husbands, fathers, protectors, etc. What the feminists don't seem to realize is that those perks are all gone. Yet men are still expected to live up to those historic responsibilities. More and more men are having the reaction of Sidney Greenstreet's character in The Maltese Falcon: "That's hardly equitable, sir. No, no, I don't think we can do business along those lines."

Take The Red Pill said...

Robert What?: "It is ironically humorous to hear women talk of "Male Privilege"..."

It is even more ironic (to say nothing of ludicrous and hypocritical) that Western women talk of "Male Privilege" so disparagingly while ignoring the existence of their own "Female Privilege".
But of course, to do so would violate and expose the fiction of their Religion of "Victimology".

earl said...

I happen to like it when a woman takes advantage of Female Privilege. When she thinks she can have both Male and Female Privilege for herself that's when she goes crazy.

Bob Wallace said...

Earl,

That sounds like a modern-day fairy tale!