Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Win or Lose, Trump is Destroying Both Traitorous Parties

He's called out Dubya Shrub as the mass-murdering war criminal that he is, who deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison.

He's called out Bill Clinton as the sexual predator he is (actually a white trash serial rapist who deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison, too).

Will he call out Hillary Clinton as the drunken carpet-muncher she is? How can the deluded think this warmonger is a liberal?

Will he call out Marco Rubio as the fag he is? And an open borders one at that?

Will he call out the press as the chronic liar it is? (There is a European saying: "He lies like print.")

The outragious he gets, the more the mass of people love him, because he's telling the truth.

Both parties all been crapping all over this country for 40 years, and I want to see both of them destroyed - dead, dead, dead.

15 comments:

Earl Thomas said...

I personally share the same disgusted sentiment with both parties in that they've both done their part in destroying this country. I flat out hate the socialist Democratic party that I could never vote for one and was nauseted voting for most politicians on the limp wristed Republican side.

I'm not sure Trump is the answer either, I think he's a blowhard and megalomanic, but he's pretty much ripped off the mask of both parties.

Glen Filthie said...

Jeez, Bob.

I'm kinda wishing YOU would run! Hey - if I run over Turdo La Doo at the cross walk - don't worry, I'll make it look like an accident...would you be willing to be Prime Minister of Canada...?

Anonymous said...

"Will he call out Hillary Clinton as the drunken carpet-muncher she is?"

I saw him allude to Hillary's presumed lady-paramour in a vague way in at least one of his recorded speeches. He didn't say anything explicit, but he raised an eyebrow, then sort of trailed off and let his audience fill in the blanks. When they applauded, he said something to the effect of "I'm glad you understand what I'm talking about". Not only is Mr. Trump the founder of the country club where President Clinton is a dues-paying member, but they frequently golf together- there's no way Trump doesn't know almost everything about their personal lives.

"I'm not sure Trump is the answer either, I think he's a blowhard and megalomanic, but he's pretty much ripped off the mask of both parties."

I keep hearing that same comment over and over- "I don't like Trump for reasons X, Y, and Z, but I can't help but agree with everything he's saying". The establishment brought him on themselves by lying so nakedly and for so long, they forgot how to inject even a little bit of truth into their lies (without which lies lose their power).

Earl Thomas said...

It's not particularly a newsflash that Trump has a huge ego. He just hasn't changed who he is to try and win an election. That's the truth he's presenting.

99% of the time every other politican will. I've seen Hillary ads in my state about who she is and her acheivements and I can basically go...'lie, lie, lie, lie...'

sth_txs said...

I almost hate using the word 'fag' or faggot to describe Rubio and others like him such as Obama.

It is an insult to fags who actually possess some manly, conservative, and decisive qualities.

Anonymous said...


"I almost hate using the word 'fag' or faggot to describe Rubio and others like him such as Obama."

Why is Rubio considered a twinkle-toes (fag)? - Isn't he married to a pretty decent looking woman? Obama I can understand - with all of the stories about his time in Chicago and his manly, abrasive, overbearing, chewbacca wife.

sth_txs said...

I did not really think about it at first, but Rubio does come across as a bit light in the loafers. Not as bad as Obama, but its there.

There were some interesting things said about this at Robert Wenzels Economic Policy Journal.

Bob Wallace said...

"Rubio does come across as a bit light in the loafers"

He looks gay, Obama more so, and Hillary is clearly a dyke. Homosexuals in politics...not a good thing.

Anonymous said...


Donald Trump Is Winning Because White America Is Dying:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-noam-chomsky-white-mortality_us_56cf8618e4b0bf0dab31838f?

Bob Wallace said...

Bullshit. Chomsky is a Jew and they all lie and believe fantasies.

Earl Thomas said...

'Homosexuals in politics...not a good thing.'

Homosexuals in any position of power or authority is not a good thing.

Anonymous said...


Homosexuals and women in any position of power or authority is not a good thing.

Women should never be leaders.

From Arthur Schopenhauer:

"... So that it will be found that the fundamental fault in the character of women is that they have no “sense of justice.” This arises from their deficiency in the power of reasoning already referred to, and reflection, but is also partly due to the fact that Nature has not destined them, as the weaker sex, to be dependent on strength but on cunning; this is why they are instinctively crafty, and have an ineradicable tendency to lie. For as lions are furnished with claws and teeth, elephants with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid, so Nature has provided woman for her protection and defence with the faculty of dissimulation, and all the power which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this form. Hence, dissimulation is innate in woman and almost as characteristic of the very stupid as of the clever. Accordingly, it is as natural for women to dissemble at every opportunity as it is for those animals to turn to their weapons when they are attacked; and they feel in doing so that in a certain measure they are only making use of their rights. Therefore a woman who is perfectly truthful and does not dissemble is perhaps an impossibility. This is why they see through dissimulation in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with them. From the fundamental defect that has been stated, and all that it involves, spring falseness, faithlessness, treachery, ungratefulness, and so on. In a court of justice women are more often found guilty of perjury than men. It is indeed to be generally questioned whether they should be allowed to take an oath at all. From time to time there are repeated cases everywhere of ladies, who want for nothing, secretly pocketing and taking away things from shop counters."

http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html

God help us if Hillary Clinton manages to become President. The world will become far more dangerous with her as President.

Anonymous said...

Donald Trump's continued rise is amazing. The American people are growing wise to the Establishment and the tricks they play on them. A Trump Presidency would be in some ways like the Reagan Presidency. Reagan, for all his faults and mistakes, wanted what was best for the American people and there were some real accomplishments.

Earl Thomas said...

'This is why they see through dissimulation in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with them.'

Exactly...I've noticed the one thing women absolutely loathe in a man is if he is a deceiver. They know it when they see it...and they are better at it.

Anonymous said...


'Letting People Vote? That's Leadership?' – TV Pundit Says GOP Should Rig Primaries to Stop Trump

MSNBC chowderhead Chris Matthews praises the Democratic Party for making sure the 'right' candidate wins. But he's furious that the GOP hasn't done the same.

http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/letting-people-vote-thats-leadership-tv-pundit-says-gop-should-rig-primaries-stop-trump