Saturday, February 27, 2016

I Encounter a Girl With Girl-Brains Sobbing in Horror Over Donald Trump

Words, of course, are the most powerful drug known to mankind. - Rudyard Kipling

I recently encountered a 21-year-woman (actually girl) who got tears in her eyes over Donald Trump, who she thought was basically an anti-women Nazi who was going to force women into being barefoot and pregnant (which originally meant women going barefoot because everything - including their fingers - swelled when they were pregnant. Their shoes didn't fit anymore).

Why is it everyone is a Nazi anyway? The Communists were five times worse.

I refer to such women as having "girl brains" - irrational, ruled by their feels, thinking their feels are always right. It's why women have traditionally not been allowed to vote (after all, remember women voted Hitler into office - all the men voted against him).

I was close to asking this girl who she was going to vote for - a drunken dyke like Hillary Clinton? (I was close to telling her that Bill Clinton apparently has HIV and that Chelsea's real father is Webb Hubbell. She probably would have blown a gasket on her five horsepower girl brains, since girls - and some men - feel actual physical pain from mere words).

I've used this line about "girl brains" more than once. Some women get very upset by this, just the way some get upset when I've asked them to make me a sandwich.

Others are rather amused by it (one told me my "boy brains" were always fishing for compliments, which amused me). Those are the ones who don't mind making me sandwiches, although one consistently made me eggplant sandwiches, which I ate without protest.

A young black man told me a few days that "females got no minds." He was more right than he knew.

Most young women are just all childish heart - all feels, no brains. It's why at least 80% of them shouldn't be allowed to vote.

It'd be a much better world.

8 comments:

Earl Thomas said...

A few things:

Nazi is probably the more go-to term because of how it is saturated in the media. So parrots repeat it. Not that they were boy scouts or choir boys...but you don't see many things denouncing or even bringing to light what the Communists did in this day and age.

What she thinks of Donald Trump is more likely her projection about her fears than actual judgement of the guy. If there has ever been a man who ever 'forced' a woman to be barefoot and pregnant (that being he's telling her she's going to be perpetually pregnant)...I'd bet it would be the first. Women are the one's who get 'baby rabies'. My thoughts on Trump are based on what I gather from how he acts. That's called judgement. It's not perfect judgement, but it's to highlight the difference between that and projection.


I don't know how she would have responded...but I guess I was in the dark about this Webb Hubbell character. So I looked into it.

So after some investigative work...turns out what was told about when they were asked about it Chelsea gave some answer that neither confirmed nor denied it, (proud to be her parent's daughter) and Webb Hubbell gave the favorite answer from a lawyer 'no comment'. That looks like some smoke to that fire to me.

Does this stuff sway my opinion on HilRod...not in the least. It's just another brick in the wall.

Anonymous said...

"... and that Chelsea's real father is Webb Hubbell."

I'm convinced of this. The resemblance between the two is striking:

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/huge-scandal-chelsea-isnt-bill-clintons-daughter/

Craig R. Meyer said...

Holy SMOKES man with this Webster Hubbell hypothesis. It only takes a quick look on Google Images to make THAT more believable than the official story. Instantly.

...which frankly makes BOTH Clintons even more disgusting to me now. That neither of them was particularly affected by the other's infidelity to the point of needing a divorce in order to emotionally function again. That they were equal partners in each using their sham marriage for his/her own individual career advancement. That's just gross. Jackals jackals jackals, all the way down.

In a way, the internet is making public dishonesty harder to get away with. We can simulate an imaginary planet like in Avatar down to the last insect, flower, leaf and twig, but an actual "IRL" life of hypocrisy is becoming near-impossible to get away with. Can anyone here imagine a Don Draper career path in the present day? What about a Hugh Hefner?

Earl Thomas said...

In the present age the internet probably highlights why 'irl' hypocrisy was always near-impossible to get away with.

There's always a whistleblower somewhere.

Cecil Henry said...

Without the Communists there are NO Nazi's.

Schopenauer spoke so well on women. Experience shows it to be very true.


'The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it in reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but hers is reason of very narrow limitations. This is why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important.'



'It is by virtue of man’s reasoning powers that he does not live in the present only, like the brute, but observes and ponders over the past and future; and from this spring discretion, care, and that anxiety which we so frequently notice in people. The advantages, as well as the disadvantages, that this entails, make woman, in consequence of her weaker reasoning powers, less of a partaker in them. Moreover, she is intellectually short-sighted, for although her intuitive understanding quickly perceives what is near to her, on the other hand her circle of vision is limited and does not embrace anything that is remote; hence everything that is absent or past, or in the future, affects women in a less degree than men. '

Anonymous said...


Maybe this is just me, but when any side in an argument accuses the other opposing side of being a Nazi, the accusing side automatically loses (unless the accused side is actually a real, genuine Nazi of course). It's a very lazy and desperate response by the accusing side who typically have no merit in their arguments and have no other logical way to counter the opposing sides views.

Anonymous said...

May I ask you for your sources on the gender breakdown for voting in Hitler? I tried to find a gender breakdown, but I was unsuccessful. I also don't speak German.

Bob Wallace said...

Women and the Nazis.

http://uncabob.blogspot.com/2014/07/obama-hitler-and-womens-votes.html