Monday, March 30, 2015

If Women Gave Birth to Many Babies Like a Cat or Dog

I've seen several cats and dogs give birth. Rarely it's just one but usually several. I sometimes wondered what would happen if women gave birth to six or seven kids.

If this had happened a few thousand years ago it would have been impossible to support that many kids, so I'm positive all of the kids except one would have been human-sacrificed to whatever pagan god was believed in. You know - rolling the kids into the fire in Moloch's stone belly.

These days, however....it'd be leftists wanting to off these kids. After all, they act as if abortion is a sacrament and now they're calling for the euthanasia of the old, the sick and the deformed. And if we have too many newborns? Well, call it post-abortion.

The value of children would drop tremendously due to oversupply. Leftists could use that as an excuse to cull tem - "overpopulation," you know.

Leftists ultimately desire the destruction of everything, so thank God women don't have that many kids.


7 comments:

Earl Thomas said...

'After all, they act as if abortion is a sacrament and now they're calling for the euthanasia of the old, the sick and the deformed.'

With that line of thinking...imagine the surprise some of these liberals will get should they become old, sick, or disabled.

The Spy said...

Those liberals want and desire Hell-on-Earth and they're going to get it....and in spades.

sth_txs said...

Like most on the left, that rule is only 'for you', not them.

Anonymous said...

http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt

While this unabomber is a batshit insane, he mskes a lot of good points about modern leftism.

Anonymous said...

"I sometimes wondered what would happen if women gave birth to six or seven kids."

You mean an r/selected species rather than the K/selected species we currently are?

To accommodate the extra carrying capacity, the infants would have to be smaller and consequently smaller brain likely leading to a smaller intellect - in short, an utterly different species.

Bob Wallace said...

I was thinking about r-selected
and was wondering if anyone would bring it up.

Ergeniz said...

When I saw the title of your post, I assumed you would be discussing R-selected breeding.

It directly correlates to the quality in offspring in most cases. Species such as rabbits, mice evolved to birth, many, low-investment offspring due to their high mortality rate,etc. Individually it means each offspring is relatively worthless. Creatures such as wolves invest more in their offspring (K-selected).

Humans should be striving to be K-selected (especially because the time it takes for humans to mature is longer than shorter lived species such as mice). The increased investment results in higher quality citizens with superior skills, morals and fitness. Several studies have proven that IQ is affected as well.

I suspect that blacks have this problem two-fold. The majority of them act like r-selected, breeding without much thought or investment. They would not be able to get away with this if not for the welfare state to subsidize their actions. This is an additional shot in the foot to the downsides of them already having lower IQ on average. Top that off with no father figure involvement (save for the boyfriends mother decides to go out and get impregnated by).

Its all very depressing, but I'm not quite sure how to fix it - although I suppose when the welfare state finally collapses perhaps they may force the lower classes to adapt a K-selected strategy. Otherwise, die off.