Wednesday, January 14, 2015

"We have pretty much dismantled our civilization in an effort to accommodate blacks..."

It's worse than that. It's being dismantled to accommodate women, Hispanics, homosexuals, and every other group that thinks it's aggrieved. And their whining is based purely on envy. Leftism, for that matter, is based on envy, and it brings down civilizations.

This article is from Stuff Black People Don't Like.


The great story of our time is one hidden in plain sight.

On the day we - "we" meaning white men, birthed by white women - launched Apollo 11 into the heavens, blacks demanded the money spent on the program be diverted to them.

Simeon Booker, longtime writer for Jet magazine, wrote this editorial in the July 31, 1969 edition.

Read it.

Memorize it.

Landing a man on the moon and beginning the conquest/colonization of space meant nothing to blacks, who instead believed the money spent on such a mission should go to them.

And only them:

Jet Editorial Comment

Moon Probe Laudable – But Blacks Need Help

Landing an astronaut on the moon has more priority in America than putting a black man on his feet, in a job, or a poor family on a decent diet. This space accomplishment at a cost of billions of dollars will receive coast to coast acclaim and international attention.

But as a black Washington correspondent, I see this week as a crucial period in history. There will be headlines and hours of radio and television time on the day to day activity. President Nixon invited the president of his alma mater, Whittier College, to speak at the White House religious service on “the Meaning of The Man on The Moon.” Meanwhile what of the man in the street – in poverty stricken Appalachia, Watts, and Harlem. He wished the astronauts well and marvels at their courage.

But he also wonders if the powers of science and technology will ever focus in such a fashion on his problems. Thanks to modern communications, even the simplest ghetto dweller knows that the American space program and its counterpart in the Soviet Union are almost as political in their motives as they are scientific.

And while the victims of poverty watch the space race with awe, we wonder how long it will be before the hypnosis of a moon flight wears off and the victims of poverty realize that they are still hungry. Perhaps the presence of the mule train of the Poor People’s Campaign at Cape Kennedy will remind some people that their NASA tax dollars might best be spent in other ways.

Sometime, somehow, we Americans – and the Russians as well – must think about making the earth a better place to live. To escape to the moon is no answer for any of us – black, white, brown or yellow. – Simeon Booker

Reading this editorial only a day after the "poet" Maya Angelou passed away helped me realize what we lost when we embarked on a mission of uplifting black people instead of launching a mission to Mars.

John Derbyshire, writing at VDare, put it quite succinctly when he nailed America's mission over the past 50 years (sadly, started five years before the moon landing on July 20, 1969).

He wrote [John Derbyshire "On Maya Angelou, Ta-Nehisi Coates: The Whining Of Pampered Pets," VDARE, 5-29-14]:

For fifty years now we’ve been giving breaks to blacks, and not just Affirmative Action sinecures like those enjoyed by Ta-Nehisi Coates and the late, but equally talentless, Ms. Angelou.

We abolished federal Civil Service exams because blacks couldn’t pass them. Our colleges turn away nonblack kids so that less well-qualified blacks can be admitted.

We shower public money on bogus claimants to farm-loan discrimination. Our media observe exquisitely sensitive protocols in reporting black-on-white misbehavior, while inflating the flimsiest allegations of white-on-black misbehavior to the level of national crises.

We gut admissions exams for police and firefighter jobs so that blacks can be hired, and pay extravagant compensation to applicants who failed the un-gutted exams. We likewise gut standards for college debate, replacing structured, reasoned argument with incoherent squawking.

We have pretty much dismantled our civilization in an effort to accommodate blacks.

And still they complain.

The Ta-Nehisi Coateses, Eric Holders, and Maya Angelous seem, in their impenetrable narcissism, to hear their own voices as the groans of an oppressed race from under the iron heel of White Supremacy.

Those voices sound to me more like the whining of pampered pets.

We decided to try and make, in the wishes of Jet writer Simeon Booker, the world "a better place to live," by investing untold trillions - and lowering standards universally - to uplift black people.

The result?

Our civilization was dismantled.

Even if you think the Apollo 11 (and subsequent moon missions) mission was only about "collecting moon rocks," it should be quite obvious now such a rock is worth far, far more than a house in 83 percent black Detroit.

20 comments:

Anders said...

Because a white civilization that bends over backwards for non whites is less likely to persecute jews when everything eventually goes to shit.

Robert What? said...

On a tangential note, we ain't never going to Mars. Hell, we probably won't be going back to the moon. As a society we have lost our will to strive for greatness. In addition, a society which prioritizes income distribution over all else will never be able to afford such grand scale projects. Lastly, the non-white peoples that are and will be displacing us have zero interest in such things.

Glen Filthie said...

Ayup.

The Dark Enlightenment continues apace.

In the years ahead we will discover that Martin Luther King was not a saint. We will find that there is indeed a need for the term 'nigger' and that it is not racist to use it. We will find that our ancestors were not hateful, ignorant racists...but realists that understood the Black Man. We will grow up enough to realize that there are exceptions to the rule and stereotype - but they ARE the exceptions...and that we can accommodate exceptional blacks on that basis without the need for affirmative action.

I figure its about 20 years away at the outside. Political correctness is beginning to fail already...and thank God for that.

Anders said...

WTF do you mean by discover, Glen? Anyone who actually reads up on anything about MLK knows that nigger was nothin' but a communist agitator that drank too much and beat white whores. In that light, anyone can see why other niggers speak so fondly of him.

Anonymous said...

Canadian here, but from the outside looking in, it appears that racism is baked in to North American culture.

Whites can identify and get excited about technological achievements like inventions (of practically everything), going to the moon etc. What about blacks, Hispanics and native Indians??

Well, they live in the culture because they have to earn a living, but deep down they know, when they look around at all the tech, infrastructure, knowledege base, everything - that their ancestors really had nothing to do with it! And I mean nothing.

Not to say that blacks and Latinos cannot handle complexity genetically, but culturally, they did not have a hand in the modern world.

Whites (SWPL) still like to believe that non-whites want to integrate and play the white man's game. It is time to realize that the definitely DO NOT. They want to maintain their own identity, their own souls and not capitulate to the white man by integrating. I don't blame them. Its just human nature.

What we are seeing is, in effect, an unconscious move to apartheid. There it is. A separation.

ray said...

The weakness of American men towards their own wives and daughters dismantled far more of America than all the ebonification since lincoln. Lots easier to blame the Race Monster tho.

Clayton Bigsby said...

Y'all seem to forget that civilizations are built in part by exploiters...they exploit the land, they exploit people. Some White Christian Europeans were no different then and they are no different now.


".but realists that understood the Black Man..."

Using your logic, realists also understand the the White Man has historically raped, pillaged, and plundered for its benefit, then bitterly complain about their own creation.

Glen Filthie said...

Oh, stuff it Ray. Good lord. This, ladies and gentlemen, is the typical product of the academic wastelands that are our public schools.

Take a look at Africa, Ray. Blacks are murdering each other. They are exploiting the UN for charity that never makes it to the people its intended for. Many countries in Africa no longer allow white emigration because if they do - the lights will go out, and the trains and buses will stop.
There is no clash of cultures holding the black man back either. I am Canadian too - and I see the same liberal turd brains pushing that concept along with multiculturalism and feminism and political correctness. Again - look at Africa. Pretty much all the black nations are dismal failures. Hop The Pond to America and look at predominantly black cities: Detroit, New Orleans, Washington - and they are chit holes too. There is only one common factor and it's genetic, not cultural.
Everything, right up to and including slavery - is a choice. Blacks are what they by choice, not by culture. The fact is any black with a work ethic can rise just like anyone else too. Raising blacks by affirmative action only produces niggers like Al Sharpton Barack Obama and Jesse Jackson.
Let us have enough of the turd polishing boys. It makes you look stupid and dishonest.

Glen Filthie said...

Hmmm...and...while we're all being honest here...let us take this contemptible idiocy from my fellow anonymous Canadian:

---------------------------

"Whites (SWPL) still like to believe that non-whites want to integrate and play the white man's game. It is time to realize that the definitely DO NOT. They want to maintain their own identity, their own souls and not capitulate to the white man by integrating. I don't blame them. Its just human nature."
-----------------------------

I am guessing this moron is from Queerbec, Morontario, or possible Canada's Land of Fruits And Nuts - BC!

Go down to the welfare office, idiot. Look at the "racial diversity" going on down there: blacks and browns. Oh they definitely DO want to integrate into our culture when the welfare cheques go out. But if any work is required they get all vibrant and ethnic and cultural. I wonder if this Canadian idiot has seen the 'culture' going on in the coloured ethnic slums?

If you're going to be honest, you Canukistani idiot - at least put some effort into it.

Bob Wallace said...

"Using your logic, realists also understand the the White Man has historically raped, pillaged, and plundered for its benefit, then bitterly complain about their own creation."

The white man is the only group who has fixed his own problems. No other race has. Or would you rather live under blacks, Asians, Jews or Mexicans?

Anonymous said...

@ Glen Filthie

-------------------------
am guessing this moron is from Queerbec, Morontario, or possible Canada's Land of Fruits And Nuts - BC!

Go down to the welfare office, idiot. Look at the "racial diversity" going on down there: blacks and browns. Oh they definitely DO want to integrate into our culture when the welfare cheques go out. But if any work is required they get all vibrant and ethnic and cultural. I wonder if this Canadian idiot has seen the 'culture' going on in the coloured ethnic slums?

If you're going to be honest, you Canukistani idiot - at least put some effort into it.
-----------------------------
Glen, I'm having a hard time feeling the love...
Minorities living off welfare is proof of my point. Living in ghettos (including Indian reservations, large centers housing just Chinese, S E Asians, blacks etc.) AND living off welfare or crime definitely shows they are not integrating into the mainstream. Yeah, some are, but not too many. They are stuck with whites through accidents of history (conquest, slavery, immigration from impossible shitholes etc.) so they take the money and benefits of western culture. Why not? They have to eat.

I recall lots of small new stories both in Canada and the US of high school students wanting separate prom nights for blacks and whites since the blacks claimed they did not feel comfortable around the whites and could not let loose and be themselves. This is replicated all over our society.

A.B. Prosper said...

Robert What? I have to disagree with you a bit. Ironically enough automation will ensure we are never going to the Moon or Mars even if somehow we can develop another energy source that can replace fossil fuels.

The demand for labor created the demand for goods that created the profits that created the surplus wealth that allowed a moon landing.

Between automation and globalism, there will be a massive wage arbitrage, demand starvation, population decline and much less surplus. Less surplus means the trillions (and yes it would cost trillions) needed for more elaborate space projects aren't there.

And yes absolutely issues of race, Cultural Marxism and even excess cold war spending had an impact. The fact is unless people are working at a good wage, they aren't buying and aren't generating wealth enough to do anything special with it.

And as for race issues, yes but its also a class issue in the Marxist sense .

largely we have slavery because the Founders could not build the society they wanted with the labor of free persons.

Yes they could have done short term indentured servants but with abundant land it was simply too expensive to support and as such the logical solution was slavery.

This basically meant "muzzling the ox that treadeth the corn" is baked into out national ideology

We got away from it in the past with some combinations of open land, religious controls on the poor mostly but also the wealthy and at later points, simple violence and the threat thereof. The unions battles of the turn of the last century and later the election of Roosevelt and the various and sundry Democrats

This was I think inevitable.


And as for a recovery, what is worse is with the declining cost of computers, energy and networking its growing easier to eliminate more and more labor .

In the end, a broad based industrial society cannot be sustained on limited work and welfare especially as your best and brightest will not have kids.

And in case anyone is thinking it you aren't getting massive amounts of free social capital and controls from religion anymore. Deal.


And you don't have a right to assume non-aggression or to delegitimize someone else's complaints.

Well you can but in reality it comes down to violence , just as the Founding of the country did.

Give people in your polity enough of what they want, expel them or kill them. Choose wisely

ray said...

Too bad, little Glennie. If THAT little bit of truth offended you, just WAIT til you read the next comment.

You can come on over any old time and stuff me. I ain't hiding. You come right on over.

Clayton Bigsby said...

“Blacks are murdering each other. They are exploiting the UN for charity that never makes it to the people its intended for.”

Indeed, there are several civil wars being undertaken in Africa post-colonialism between rival tribal groups. Not anything different than past carnage between whites like the Croat-Serbians in the 1990's and Russians-Germans in the two world wars..

“They are exploiting the UN for charity that never makes it to the people its intended for.”

And foreign multinational companies siphon $46 billion out of sub-Saharan Africa each year into tax havens by collecting “business taxes” from local storeowners to sell their products. I suppose it all evens out.


“There is only one common factor and it's genetic, not cultural.”



There are white shit holes in Hungary, Russia, South Africa, and Canada. Is this “genetic”?


“The white man is the only group who has fixed his own problems. No other race has.”

Conversely, the white man is the only group to fuck up Mother Earth through religious wars, colonialism/imperialism, and crony capitalism. If you want to own the “successes”, you have to own the “failures”, bro.

Now, what problems has the white man solved recently? Lack of faith in God? Poverty? Ebola?

Bob Wallace said...

Anyone who thinks all cultures and people are equal except that white culture and white are the worst, is a leftist - which is a mental illness.

The Anti-Gnostic said...

Conversely, the white man is the only group to fuck up Mother Earth through religious wars, colonialism/imperialism, and crony capitalism.

You're a brainwashed fool. Africa under black rule is an environmental and crony-capitalist disaster. Central and South America, India, SE Asia, all the same. You could as easily just restate "the rule of law" as, "where the white people live." I truly wish it were otherwise.

BTW, increasingly Latino California is biding its time to give John Muir and the wilderness preservation movement the old heave-ho.

http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-rethinking-muir-20141113-story.html#page=1

Bob Wallace said...

The worst slums I've seen in the U.S. have been black and "Latino." They're horrible, and the white man didn't do that to them.

Clayton Bigsby said...

“Africa under black rule is an environmental and crony-capitalist disaster.”

No different than when whites govern a country racked by political, economic, and social upheaval. Regarding crony capitalism, was it not developed and implemented by whites?


“You could as easily just restate "the rule of law" as, "where the white people live.”

Corrected for accuracy—Where white people have conquered to live.


“Anyone who thinks all cultures and people are equal except that white culture and white are the worst, is a leftist - which is a mental illness.”

[Laughs] it’s no surprise that people with lesser facilities always resort to the claim “leftism is a mental disease” with no observable data that, employing medical criteria, definitively proves your assertion. It’s a default button that is conveniently pressed.


“They're horrible, and the white man didn't do that to them.”

Whites are PARTLY to blame for those countries whapped upside the head by the hand of imperialism.


“The worst slums I've seen in the U.S. have been black and “Latino."

So, what are the metrics involved in determining how black/Latino slums are worse than white/Asian slums? How do you compare the conditions—lack of running water/electricity, rampant disease, impoverished children? Please offer evidence to back up your assertion. I provided two resources to help you.

http://www.dw.de/inside-europes-slums/a-18011677

http://technicallyjuris.blogspot.com/2010/06/poor-people-and-slums-in-japan.html



“BTW, increasingly Latino California is biding its time to give John Muir and the wilderness preservation movement the old heave-ho.”



From your source—“who polls show [Hispanics] are among the most devoted environmentalists in the state.” In fact, Latinos are strident protectors of nature.

http://www.boulderweekly.com/article-13311-why-latinos-care-about-the-environment.html

http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/lescalante/los_verdes_are_the_greenest_la.html

In your haste, you experienced a reading comprehension problem. Go figure.

Moreover, God is CLEAR about Christians’ duty to nature.

Genesis 9:12-13 - And God said, "This is the sign of the covenant I am making between me and you and every living creature with you, a covenant for all generations to come: I have set my rainbow in the clouds, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and the earth.


Finally, notice how “Booby” and “auntie” neglected to respond to this statement—There are white shit holes in Hungary, Russia, South Africa, and Canada. Is this “genetic”?

The Obvious said...

Nice sockpuppet there Clayton, or Cheech and Chong found god.

Bob Wallace said...

Clayton is a leftist. They rarely admit it, though. Again, all cultures are equal to them, except for whites, which is evil.