Friday, October 2, 2015

"SEXBOTS: WHY WOMEN SHOULD PANIC"

I'm not bothered by the sex toys, which will only be used by the nuts anyway. I'm concerned about men checking out because women cannot take their place.

As Carl Jung noticed, women are biologically indispensable because they have the babies and men are culturally indispensable because they created everything.

This is from Breitbart and was written by Milo Yianopoulos.


Sex with robots will be ‘the norm’ in 50 years, say experts. Men are considering the prospect with curiosity and a sense of humour. But academics and feminists are terrified and calling for them to be banned. Let me tell you why.

Who, or what, men have sex with is the basis of our civilisation. It is the driving force behind our greatest accomplishments. Men don’t compete for abstract pleasure: they compete to bag the best mate. The internet, the pyramids and the moon landings would not exist were it not for man’s desire to have sex with woman.

That’s why Nature experiments more widely with men: the male IQ range is wider, and there is more variation in male behaviour and biology than in women. Men are where experimentation happens, because a wider variety of male aptitudes and preferences will keep women happier and result in a more well-rounded and healthy society.

But male sexual appetites are easily satisfied, despite what women will tell you. Blow jobs really aren’t that difficult, and in any case most blokes are fine with a pizza and a wank. For many men, sex is a nice bonus, but it’s not essential. When you introduce a low-cost alternative to women that comes without all the nagging, insecurity and expense, frankly men are going to leap in headfirst.

Another reason men might be enthusiastic about female-free sex is obvious: the sociopathic, man-hating feminism we see so much of on television and in our newspapers today is turning men off dealing with women altogether. Constant whinging about “toxic masculinity,” “manspreading,” “mansplaining,” the bogus gender pay gap and the absurd campus rape culture myth are pushing the sexes apart, fostering mistrust and fear.

The fact that wacky, misandrist intersectional feminists are an unpopular minority — as a result of their horrid influence, just 18 per cent of women now call themselves feminists — doesn’t matter because they hold court in the media and on campuses, and young women are starting to parrot discredited and absurd nonsense about the “oppressive patriarchy,” picking up on a victimhood script they believe they can leverage for social and professional advantage.

In response, men are simply checking out, giving up on women and retreating into porn and video games. I call it the “sexodus,” and its immediate victims aren’t men, but women, who are being consigned to singledom as men lose interest in them or are simply too exhausted or fearful of the social consequences of approaching girls romantically. The truth is, men get along okay without women, unlike women, who become shrieking, neurotic messes if they’re still single in their 30s.

Sorry, no offence, but it’s true: women have been getting steadily unhappier since the Second World War, when they first entered the workplace in large numbers. It sounds bizarre, but ever since the rise of feminism, every decade has seen another slump in female morale. Women now report themselves more generally depressed and more likely to think about suicide than at any time in history. (The vast majority of suicides are still men, by the way. Women talk about it endlessly, but rarely pull it off.)

The fight for women’s “equality” has always been absurd: why would a woman want to step down to the lower status of being equal with men? Why should women be badgered into choosing to work over having babies and being happy? Why are feminists lying to women that they can look however they want — fat, hairy armpits, piercings, blue hair — and still be content?

Women were told by feminists that they could “have it all” — the career, the husband, the kids and the book club. But it was a lie. What they’ve ended up with instead is a tiny apartment in an “up and coming” bit of town, friends they hate, a string of disastrous and emotionally unfulfilling past relationships and a cat.

Had the relations between the sexes been healthier today, there wouldn’t be much call for sexbots to get in the way. Women already had the upper hand, sexually. They had what men wanted. There’s a reason the Ashley Madison leak showed that the site was over 90 per cent male.

But gender relations in the West are at their worst for fifty years, possibly more, which is why popular men’s bloggers are now asking whether sexbots will replace women entirely. The consensus seems to be: for some men, yes, totally. For other men, they will become a masturbation tool. A few “alphas” and players at the top will be able to bang their way around the entire female population, which will be comprised of ever more neurotic, backstabbing and insane behaviour.

Feminists always hate when they accidentally get what they want. They’ve been waging a war on sex on campuses and elsewhere for decades. Now, suddenly, they will earn the fruits of their labour: the “whiny manbabies” they’ve been bullying for so many years are going to be ejaculating into silicon-ribbed pleasure-bots, instead of grovelling at their feet for a chance to smell their knickers.

“Ladies, if you think guys are selfish, egotistical pricks now, just wait until they start showing up to dates basked in the afterglow of sex with their Jessica Alba robots,” writes the widely-read blog Ch√Ęteau Heartiste. “It is going to take a lot more to win over a guy who is that sexually satisfied.”

I think he’s right. What’s clear is that the purchase women have over men, sexually and emotionally, is fading fast. That’s perhaps one reason for the “spitting tacks” fury of modern feminism: the louder they yell, the more men simply tune out and disappear into porn, robots and video games. Technology didn’t disempower women sexually — they did that to themselves with feminism — but it is accelerating the process.

In the short term, sexbots will be good news for dudes. For one thing, with a robot, men know the orgasm will be fake, so it removes the performance anxiety of trying to make the grade. (Men know the robot orgasm doesn’t exist — unlike the female orgasm, whose existence is still insisted upon by some conspiracy theorists and biological extremists.) And Heartiste says that real women are going to get “looser and more willing to please” as men become “choosier and less willing to please.”

Dildos and vibrators have become a permanent part of feminist iconography. They are celebrated because their existence suggests that men are disposable. Macy Gray once wrote a tongue-in-cheek love song about her “Battery-Operated-Boyfriend,” and it has been common for columnists to go a step further and to casually and sometimes even triumphantly remark that dildos and other sex toys are going to make men obsolete. Well, sorry ladies, but the shoe is on the other foot now.

Although some women will respond rationally to the changing dynamics of the dating economy, one thing’s for sure: they’re going to start treating each other even more terribly than they do already. It’s a little-known secret that the worst trolls online are often women, and very often their targets are other girls.

Because they’re miserable, women are acting out. That’s what’s fuelling the angry feminist harpies of the third-wave movement, and it’s why women are so mean to each other. All that talk of the feminist sisterhood is a myth: ladies behave absolutely abominably to one another, socially and in the workplace. And remember, the number of men putting themselves on the market is going to go down, so competition between females will get utterly vicious.

I mean, look, I don’t mean to be rude, but most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads. Imagine how much worse they’re going to get when the passive aggressive manipulation tactics stop working because the guy can get himself off with a thinner, hotter robot any time he wants to. They’re going to go mental.

All that said, my hunch is that marriage will benefit from a reduced focus on sex. With desire taken out of the marital equation, it’s conceivable that the number of “partnership marriages” between people who get on well and respect each other enough to share the load of raising children will grow. Without the power imbalance built in to traditional heterosexual marriage — i.e., women holding all the cards — marriage could become stronger than ever.

But — and this is a big but — this apparent shift in favour of men will come at the expense of society and the wider economy. We’ve already seen in Japan what happens when men and women lose interest in each other. Japan’s nationwide sexual dysfunction is at the root of its economy’s problems, and it’s the reason for the country’s cultural implosion, too.

We’ll have it even worse here in the West, because Japan is still patriarchal. As a result, society functions. In the West, women are surging ahead into positions of dominance in the media, the arts, academia, politics, you name it. Some people will find this offensive, but: matriarchy is a problem for the rest of us. As feminist critic Camilla Paglia so memorably put it, if civilisation had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts.

When men start checking out en masse, as is already happening, you can say good-bye to all of society’s best astrophysicists, mathematicians, philosophers, composers and chess players. Scientific progress will effectively stall, because men are just as happy beating a video game as they are solving the riddles of the universe — and they’ll take the entertainment option if they have no interest in impressing women.

Women will not take men’s places in these disciplines, because there simply aren’t enough women with IQs over 120. Again, sorry if you find that offensive, but it’s just a fact. IQ isn’t a perfect measure, by any means, but it’s the best gauge we have of whether someone can perform the higher-level functions needed to be a game-changing scientist or transcendently brilliant artist.

Sex with a woman will always be the prestige form of intercourse, to put it in the language of marketers. But the sexual marketplace is changing terrifyingly fast. Sex won’t be truly commoditised until there is a mass-produced, victimless, cheap alternative to having sex that is good enough for most men.

It won’t be long before we arrive at that point. And the consequences are going to shake the foundations of our economy and irreparably change how our society is organised. It will also, I’m sorry to say, leave women even more horribly unhappy and lonely than they already are. If I were you, girls, I’d start being a bit nicer to your boyfriends…

9 comments:

Mindstorm said...

http://www.projectaiko.com - if this would be realized (or one of its alternatives), then how much time it will be before someone else customizes the bought model to suit his 'needs'?

Mindstorm said...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHszyYbg5Ao - and this is 'campus rape', as understood by feminists

Mindstorm said...

I find it doubtful that the trait the most needed to become a great artist would be intelligence. Creativity and intelligence are weakly related at best.

Mindstorm said...

"I'm not bothered by the sex toys, which will only be used by the nuts anyway."

No offense, Bob, but would you write that vibrators are only used by the female nuts as well? An online poll attached to one of articles on this subject had 2/3 of responders 'interested in this development' vs. 1/3 disgusted by this perspective. I know, these polls are not representative, self-selection and all that, but it's an awful lot of 'nuts' out there. :)

Anonymous said...

"With desire taken out of the marital equation, it’s conceivable that the number of “partnership marriages” between people who get on well and respect each other enough to share the load of raising children will grow."

At least there will be no more unilateral decision making by women on things like children.

Anonymous said...

Gather 'round this oracle

this most grim prophecy.

For there within dames future lies

the fate that I've forseen.

For oh, so long

the case has been

nobody knows for sure.

All the fuss

that dames do make

the men had to endure.

The cause was hiding in plain sight.

It had to do with sex.

About the time of puberty

that men aquire this hex.

That they must do what women want

or what shall be their fate?

To go out every Friday night

their right hand for their date.

But as the march of progress made

females did not forsee.

That men might solve their problem

through VR technology.

"So what?" dames said.

"Good riddance then!

Weeds out the boys and jerks!

We've no need for Peter Pans who do not want to work!

If - you won't man up and marry

then you're just a wussy!

'Sides real men want same things we do

WITHOUT reward of pussy!"

(........snicker.......snicker.......)

"Besides no way

can VR sex

replace our human touch!"

But soon enough improvements meant

the difference wasn't much.

Before you know it

off it went!

It took the world by storm.

Most chicks were taken

quite aback

how fast it was the norm.

Were once a pretty maiden fair

so easily adored

found out in spite

of her great looks

she really was ignored!

As for getting married?

Most females out of luck.

In terms of having options

they seemed to be quite stuck.

What's the point in trying

when chances be so thin?

A hundred million gals

chasin' 8 or 9 'real' men?

And less men on plantation

means less income to tax.

Welfare queens and single mom's

the first to get the axe.

You tried to say that it was sick.
Perversion of the brain.
Whatever that you thought would stick
to ease away your pain.
It's what you get for dissin'
all the nerds and geeks in school.
The pussy they were missin'
now they've outsourced you so cruel.

The girls all looked around them

with an issue to contend.

"This VR sex they got out now

must be put to an end!"

With tax base shrinking

local leaders

echoed this profound.

"A bachelor tax is what we need

to turn these things around!"

Petitioned global powers be

but pleas fell on deaf ears.

For joo elites that ran the West

had different plans my dear.

For good or ill they'd set their sights

reducin' population.

"What better way to do that

than this super masturbation?"

Deprived of honey

to catch flies

dames sought another way.

"Guess vinegar will have to do to

for lever-age these days.

Fuck working hard!

That's no way for

attention to be ours.

Plus disrespect and rudeness

add drama to our hours."

But when they tried to nag and hit

to show the men who's boss.

They all were taken quite aback

at this their sudden loss.

Where were the knights in shining armor?

Backup when they need?

Why, pokin' Princess Leia

thru her steel V R pan - ties!

They still all payed lip service

to feminists old creed.

About all things misandric

they could not more agree.

But calling them to action?

The feminists were stuck.

Behind their eyes

manginas just

no longer gave a fuck.

For what's the point in fighting men

just for a snatch so cold

when you can bang chicks all you like

for cost of a console?

You tried to say that it was sick.
Perversion of the brain.
Whatever that you thought would stick
to ease away your pain.
But now when you get in their face
They don't submit to you.
They knock you clean across the place!
Oh, what's a girl to do!?

Anonymous said...

They called the cops "Come to our aid!"

How could THEY not refuse?

To which the cops replied in turn

"We've got too much to do!

Your plight's not so unique these days.

It's like this all the time.

One girl got punched dead in the face

just asking for a DIME!

If you wish to file a charge

please sit and take a number.

May take you nearly

a whole week.

Take camping gear for slumber."

Outraged at this

turn of events

one dame shamed them in rage.

"WHY DON'T YOU BOYS MAN-UP RIGHT NOW

AND PUT THEM IN A CAGE!?"

The cop at the reception desk

looked up with furrowed brow.

Decided then, tell her the truth.

The time for it was now.

"Our pensions are just not enough

please cut us all some slack!

Besides, what if

a perp we find

just happens to be black?

Even IF in self defense

we shoot a black man dead

the mayor has us fired

just so streets won't all run red.

For rioters and looters

care fucking less whose right.

A fact that keeps

a lot of white oppressors up all night.

So this that I disclose to you

you'll surely find macabre

we prefer you're face be bloodied

to the loss of all our jobs."

You tried to say that it was sick.
Perversion of the brain.
Whatever that you thought would stick
to ease away your pain.
Police have all their work cut out.
White knights sex satiated.
No men around protect you
from assaults you aggravated.

Some braver chicks said

"C'mon girls!

We don't need men no how!

Let's all buy us a gun and clip.

Defend ourselves right now!"

But trouble was most guns around

just happened to be men's.

And those darn old joo elites

had just put gun sales to an end.

When they went out shopping

they could hardly purchase dick.

Plus men could shoot much bigger guns

and still handle the kick!

And when they took up sniping

as with this the gals claim best

the men made all sorts

of new drones

to inflitrate their nests.

Technology's men's cup of tea.

How nice of you to notice.

'Stereotype threat'

is well known

as pure fem hocus pocus.

You tried to say that it was sick.
Perversion of the brain.
Whatever that you thought would stick
to ease away your pain.
No men around to help you.
You're forced to fight alone.
Twixt this and Muslim immigrants
the land looks a warzone.

With anarchy and violence

folks fighting for their meals.

Wasn't long till western gals

all be-came slaves for real!

Forget what college taught you

'bout life for gals back then.

You really were all

just a bunch of

pampered clucking hens.

Spoiled little children!

You could not have forseen.

Your overlords now teach you

what oppression really means.

So there you have it

my dear girls.

The prophecy unfold.

You really should consider this

if I might be so bold.

Best advice for you right now?

Stop dissin' nerds and geeks!

You might e-ven consider

give 'em anal once a week?

And when a girl you know is fibbin'

'bout a non existent rape.

Don't hesitate to blow the whistle

right up in her face.

For few things are as suited

for bringing social blight

than a little girl a cryin'

-"Wolf!"-

almost every night.

I assure you we're not sick.
Clear thinking are our brains.
VR sex is here to stay
to ease away (our) pain.
I think it's much more than a hunch
you're fate's not so mysterious.
With no sex leverage 'yall ain't much.
Just 8 year olds with periods.

Take The Red Pill said...

Better to have a have a sexbot in your life, instead of a Fembot.

MGTOW'd Out said...

"Better to have a have a sexbot in your life, instead of a Fembot."

Thanks, Take The Red Pill. More opportunities for us men. If you don't want to compete, feel free to get sex with a mechanical object.


Regarding Milo...

“Sex with robots will be ‘the norm’ in 50 years, say experts.”



Who are these so-called experts? What norm will be established?

“But male sexual appetites are easily satisfied, despite what women will tell you.”



Actually, speaking from experience, male sexual appetites are more complicated than what Milo states.

“Blow jobs really aren’t that difficult, and in any case most blokes are fine with a pizza and a wank”

I would like to talk these blokes whom you are referring to, because the dudes I know want more from their ladies.

“In response, men are simply checking out, giving up on women and retreating into porn and video games.”

Yes, some men. I believe they are referred to as gammas, or so I’ve been told.

“The truth is, men get along okay without women, unlike women, who become shrieking, neurotic messes if they’re still single in their 30s.”



More like opinion.

“What they’ve ended up with instead is a tiny apartment in an “up and coming” bit of town, friends they hate, a string of disastrous and emotionally unfulfilling past relationships and a cat.”



This post is just a pile of generalizations mish-mashed together to make it appear that Milo knows what he is discussing.

“A few “alphas” and players at the top will be able to bang their way around the entire female population...”


It’s more than a few. Try a majority of men.

“In the short term, sexbots will be good news for dudes.”



How uncivilized.

“I mean, look, I don’t mean to be rude, but most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads.”



No, you just deal with nutty feminized men. There’s no observably no difference.

“All that said, my hunch is that marriage will benefit from a reduced focus on sex.”



When does a hunch = fact?