I have found that 80% of women are manpleasers, but with the influence of feminism - even if these women don't call themselves feminists - it's down to about 20% by now.
I first noticed this phenomenon in college.
I've written before I spent my last year and a half living in a studio apartment attached to a house with ten girls in it. I got to know them very well.
Two of them were very much manpleasers and liked me very much. That's 20%. Six of them, in varying degrees, and both liked and hated me (talk about confused!). Two weren't manpleasers, and would never be (guess what they thought of me). The two who weren't were very much leftist, including one midwit who was working on a graduate degree in political science (God know what leftist horrors she believes now).
I believe it is an instinct among women to be manpleasers, but that instinct can be warped by what they're taught. So, then, women actually have two contradictory natures - to be subservient and please men, and to try to control them with their socialist/fascist/envious/hate-filled natures (the last part is in the last part of the story of the Garden of Eden, with the comment about "your desire will be to control your husband but he shall rule you").
Is it any wonder that leftism is feminine, which means feminism is leftist - based on envy and hate?
The six who were in varying degrees manpleasers were very much confused as a result of their feminist indoctrination and therefore showed various degrees of hostility toward men, including me. They were confused, as many women are today - and they had to idea why except to blame it on me.
They wanted to please men but at the same time showed hatred toward them. I remember thinking, what do these goofballs want? Do they even know? Freud wondered the same thing.
Here's a concrete example. I know a woman who admits she is a "people pleaser." She's not. She's a manpleaser.
You think she'd be married and have kids. She's not. And it's too late for either.
Knowing she's a manpleaser, I once asked her to make me a sandwich (this is a good test for women).
She threw a fit. I thought, how odd, she wants to please men but throws a conniption fit when I made a simple request. I'm sure she considered my request "oppressive" and me a patriarchial right-wing sexist pig.
What's funny is that she really liked me and thought I was funny and smart. But that leftist indoctrination had infected her character to the point it ruined her life.
She also told me the men she gets involved with "won't accept my career." I just smiled, because men couldn't care less about a woman's "career." Men, except the leftist manginas, are always going to put her desire to please them over her "career."
This has happened a lot, with older women crying, "My kids! My grandkids! Where are they?" They deluded themselves they didn't need men, marriage and children and thought career would fufill them. They fell for a bunch of lies.
When I owned a taxi I once picked up a woman who told me her life's story (I got this all the time).
She was very much a manpleaser. She said she liked drawing a bath for her husband before he came home from work and having dinner ready. Turned out, for some reason she never told me, it didn't work out and they got divorced.
The Manosphere offers all kinds of advice toward men, a little bit good, a lot terrible. But all of it is about turning women back into they manpleasers they were meant to be.
Women have always been the emotional, the receptive and the dependent. That's their nature. This means they're far more liable than men to believe stupid things. They accept it almost uncritically, and since many women are natural socialists/fascists, they fall right into that trap, and since they are very much prone, in their childish way, to blame their problems on men, their leftist indoctrination feeds right into that.
No woman can be both a fascist/socialist and a manpleaser. I remember reading an article many years ago in which all those '60s feminists admitted the were romantics - but what they wanted a tall, brilliant, rich, handsome man who was a socialist/fascist - in other words, a man who does not exist.
For that matter, Gloria Steinem has been described as a hopeless romantic, one who is dependent on men. She finally got married after spending her life denigrating it and saw fertility clinics in hope of getting pregnant. And Betty Friedan, that hideous monster, got married and had kids. And when younger she was a Stalinist. When older, who knows? Except for being uglier than when younger.
Ultimately men have let this happen. Why? A misguided sense of fairness? Finally they're realizing "fairness" is not what it is, not when whenever men give women what they want, they want more and throw a lot of it back in men's faces.
Whenever men go, women follow. They're 100% dependent on men, since men created everything in the world. Then they want to impose their socialism/fascism on it.
I once had a girlfriend who was originally a socialist/fascist. She was very smart, with an IQ of 143 and an MBA in Accounting and Finance. She got involved with a man whom she followed into being a libertarian. Then later, she got involved with me.
Where men went, even she followed.
I actually remember meeting older women, when I was about 19, who told me that women weren't the equal of men. At that time I was surprised they said that. But now I realize they were right; women really are the weaker vessel.
When I was in middle school the girls were required to take home economics. I'm sure this doesn't happen anymore, with the more radical of feminists throwing a fit until this requirement was dropped.
Again, ultimately it's men's fault for allowing this to happen, because they don't understand that contradictory nature of women. Men in the past did, which is why women have never been allowed to vote.
Of course, none of this will stand, but how long until things straighten up? That, always, in the question.