Let’s look at what we’d have to do. First, we’d have to keep men out of influential high-paying jobs that require a lot of education and work. That can be done with Affirmative Action, which essentially means “white men need not apply.”
We’d also have to keep men out of college, which is what is happening these days. Right now there are a lot more women in college than men. This is a good thing. No, it’s a great thing!
Men should only be carpenters (I used to be one), taxi drivers (used to be one), coal miners (nope), stuff like that. Stuff that women don’t want to do because it’s too hard, hot, dirty, dangerous, unpleasant, etc.
Women want those nice indoor air-conditioned jobs where they can sit around, drink coffee, hold meetings, and think they’re working. And this is good!
One of my taxi driver friends got murdered. Another got repeatedly stabbed in the face with a steak knife by a crazy woman. Then there was the one had the misfortune of having a pistol pointed at him three times during three different robberies. But all of this is okay! Men are worthless and expendable!
The fact is, men shouldn’t be educated at all. They’re awful!! They should be like those Epsilon-Minus Semi-Morons in Brave New World, the ones that ran the elevators. Serves them right.
The worst -- especially the worst! – are white men, who are drooling troglodyte sexist racist homophobic specieist child-molesting rapist pornographer Ice People brutes who introduced slavery into the world. (Well, actually, that’s not true – white men got rid of slavery, and in record time: about 55 years, after slavery was around at least 7000 years. But facts don’t matter!)
Men should receive no education at all. Not even reading, writing and arithmetic! Revenge is good, and it doesn’t matter if it’s aimed at the wrong people.
One way to prevent this education is by drugging little boys. I think Ritalin would be a good choice. It’ll fix their brains up but good, like that Ritalin child Kurt Cobain, who returned the favor by fixing his own brains permanently!
Yep, make sure men receive no education, dope them up, prevent them by law from getting educated jobs…and women will be able to rule the world!
Now what kind of world would we have if women ruled it completely and men had absolutely no influence at all, had no education, and were completely at the bottom?
I think the humorist P.J. O’Rourke gave us a clue with his comment, “Without men, civilization would last until the next oil change.” Or as Camille Paglia commented, if women had been in charge of civilization, we’d still be living in grass huts. Okay, well, maybe teepees.
Hmmm…let’s see…who invented about 97% of everything in the world? Well, as best as I can remember, it was European men and their descendants in America. Those horrible hideous white men who are responsible for every problem in the world! . . . they invented almost everything? Huh?
But let’s concentrate on the United States and not the entire world. If women ruled completely and men had no influence at all, it’d be a great country. Utopia! Paradise on Earth!
Things would go backward, of course, I suppose to some sort of primitive, barely technological society. Tribal and pastoral. But that would be great!
I think I might be exaggerating a little bit (or maybe a lot) but you can learn a lot from reductio ad absurdum.
Very few women can invent anything – or drive for that matter -- but so what? A primitive, loving, pastoral tribe in which everyone chipped in and helped change the babies…it’d be wonderful! It’d be just like that idyllic tribe in One Million Years B.C., in which Raquel Welch wore a two-piece fur bikini. Woo hoo, what a life! I can’t wait.
Of course, women (and some men) don’t believe this would happen. Somehow – not quite sure how – we’d still have an advanced technological society with big-screen TVs and SUVs and dentistry and surgery and easy high-paying careers, even though men would be so uneducated, stupid, doped up and out of work they couldn’t do anything except drink and smoke dope and lie around jerking off to computer porn and wondering how to use that sex-toy they bought mail-order.
But what the heck. All those women oppressed throughout history, why, once they’re free, think of all the inventions waiting to be invented by them! Forget that Gloria Steinem said that logic didn’t matter. It doesn’t matter! Or that there are certain things that shouldn’t be investigated, like the differences between men and women. She’s right about that, too!
And of course, women would have all the government jobs, so we can be ruled by bureaucrats. Of course, being women, they won’t act like bureaucrats, unless they were mommy-bureaucrats. Thank God for that!
Women being supported by the government is a good thing, since marriage would collapse, what with men not being able to support a family. So women would have babies without being married or the children having a father’s influence. All of us would end up acting lower-class. And this is good!
It’s always a good thing for teenage girls to not get married and have kids to get more welfare. And for teenage boys to form gangs as surrogate families. And the fact these things are caused by not having intact families with fathers? It’s a good thing!
In essence, women would be marrying the government. And this is a good thing. Families and fathers are so primitive!
Well, primitive yes, but not primitive like tribal primitive. That’s good primitive. It’d be some other kind of primitive, like not-needed primitive, like hair in your ears or nostrils.
So what if many women would be unhappy hateful frustrated hysterical shrews, except for all those revenge-minded man-hating lesbians who helped found feminism? And envious ugly leftist feminists like the hideous monster Betty Friedan? And if men are unhappy and drink and do drugs and get violent? Ha! Since when did happiness ever matter? Revenge is what matters! Fairness is what matters…well, yeah, I know, it wouldn’t be fair, but so what?
And if society didn’t advance and instead went backwards, so what about that, too? Primitive tribes without dental care and air-conditioning are the place to be!
Many women are natural socialists, which means they are irrational, ruled by their feelings and think everyone should be forced to share and do favors for others whether they want to or not. This is good. I think that’s the reason they’ve always been denied the vote. That’s not good! It’s certainly why so many of them vote Democrat. And that’s good!
Throughout history women have always been the home and the heart (maybe it should be the Home and the Heart). Men have always been the rational creative inventing part – the fixers, the inventors, the discoverers.
About 40 years ago the brain researcher Paul McLean discovered three structures to the brain: at the bottom, the reptilian complex, on top of that, the limbic system (emotion) and on top of that, the neocortex (reason).
One writer called it the Snake brain, the Eve brain, and the Adam brain. But whatever you call it, the rational brain sits on top of the emotional brain, which means our emotions are supposed to be subject to our reason -- not the other way around.
It’s not as if men are all reason and women are all emotion. Each sex has a bit of the other in it, like Jung postulated with the anima/amimus or that Yin/Yang thingie.
If each gender didn’t have a bit of the other in it, we’d never be able to understand each other. Both sexes have mirror neurons, although women have more. Men have a bigger visual-spatial area in their brain. That’s a bad thing! . . .I think.
But, heck, so what? Facts don’t matter. Only archaic left-wing socialist/tribal fantasies matter. It doesn’t even matter if they don’t work and destroy lives and societies!
I, for one, welcome our new Eve overlords. All our base are belong to them!
6 comments:
I think you may be worrying a little unduly Bob.Women will still want their male counterparts rubber stamp and there will always be males who rise to the top of the tree,not least of all in defence of the country.The rough,dirty jobs will remain unfilled unless men do them and it is up to them to decide what the going rate will be,by the use of withdrawing labour.It will then be up to the local police force what they do about it and most police will always be male.The upper class will be ok,it is those boys who are unable to get an education who may break away from society as it will be then.On the other hand,women's choices will be limited because,once women
are the leaders they will not put up with all the feely feely excuses and the whining
that is happening at present.
You never know Bob,there may well be some surprising turnarounds.Anyway it is not women you should fear,it is those males who see their own sex as a threat and are
adamant about destroying it.
"White men got rid of slavery, and in record time: about 55 years."
Woah! Slow down a bit. That statement was completely over the top, not to mention totally untrue on so many levels. I can see where you are going with that, but it's not very accurate.
There are still numerous forms of slavery that exist all over the world. Sex-trafficking in Eastern Europe and Latin America, slave labor sweat shops in China, India, Bangladesh, etc. These are all rampant forms of hard, real slavery and exploitation that still exist.
The American Civil War did not end worldwide slavery. Slavery and exploitation are inherent traits of humanity that existed since the beginning, and will be with us until the end.
Your writing is interesting, but I wish at times you would be more intellectually honest. Perhaps I've misunderstood something here, but you must refrain from making blanket statements like that.
The British sent warships into Brazil to stop their slave trade. There are slaves today, but it's not in the First World.
The current story I'm writing is written as though tech will take over the world. The point of the story is not that, however, it's what you're discussing here: the snake brain, serpent brain, whatever we wish to call it, has at its core envy, spite and totalitarian ideas.
Robots won't take over the world. It will be the snake brain in the form of technology or some such, the way I see it.
you are mistaken on this, women are generally socialistic in thought and especially in groups.
basically they are inclined toward communism or at least allow it to manifest and that results in corruption of society.
men are more individualistic and allow for more independant thought.
if it were not for men (conversely if women ruled) we would be sitting around a camp fire singing (or grunting primitively).
it is men who shaped the world, built the cities and the ships and planes and bridges. and it is because men, women (in general) would not have done these things or cared that they be done, they cared for their children and they preferred the group think that mothers of herd animals have.
men and women make a great team but each has different needs and wants. that is why women need to make laws to gain power they have no right to have of their own merit. in other words they force an unnatural state on society if given the chance. and the weak men have let them.
if they can or wish to compete in the male side I have no issue. if they want to be builders and engineers then good for them. but those are a very small percentage.
We had a saying when I worked as a mechanic, "if this were an easy job, women would be doing it."
Post a Comment