If Nothing Else Trump Has Destroyed Both Parties

Although we did it using Trump as our instrument.

To be totally accurate it was we stupid inbred hillbillies/crypto-Nazis/Klan sympathizers/wife-beaters in Flyover Land who put him in office. However, it had to be someone of Trump's temperament and beliefs to be there in the first place for us to do this.

Since it is impossible to predict the future I have no idea what kind of President Trump is going to be. But so far he is keeping his word. I think he is going to be a good start at getting this country back on track. He is at least putting America first, which neither party has ever done.

Trump has destroyed the traitorous Republican party - and thank God for that. It will never be the same, and it is finally realizing it brought its problems on itself.

Trump has also put a permanent end to the political aspirations of the Bush Crime Family.

Daddy Bush was pretty bad and his son Dubya was an absolute catastrophe, one of the worst Presidents the U.S. has ever had. Is this retarded family a group of genetic warmongers? It appears so.

Trump has put an end to the Clinton Crime Family, too. I'm sure that when the Hildabeast (whose character reminds me of Gollum) realized she had lost she threw a fit, shrieking and crying and ranting and raving and throwing things around and cursing every member of the Basket of Deplorables who couldn't see how wonderful and competent she was. I'm surprised she didn't have a stroke.

The Republican party is in disarray and the Democratic party is now a coastal party. And I'm smiling about the whole thing (California should be chopped up into six different states).

The remnants of the Democrats (and the remnants of the media) are going to attack Trump unmercifully for the next four years. And is the Hildabeast dumb enough to try to run again in four years? She might be deluded enough to try.

I don't know what the Republicans are going to do. The way Trump has just humiliated Romney by pretending to consider him for anything in his administration is really quite funny. Perhaps Trump is telling the other Republicans, "Don't screw with me because I'll get you."

After all, we the public got both parties for screwing with us. Perhaps both parties will listen now.

Revenge - or perhaps justice - is sweet, isn't it?

The Seven Deadly Sins and Gratitude

I've had a lot of experience with chronically angry people (I was raised with one). I have found they're angry because their lives are not perfect. Not surprisingly they're very critical of others. It's always someone else's fault, not theirs.

Anger is one of the Seven Deadly Sins. I have also found that anyone who suffers from any of them, chronically, never has any gratitude.

And without gratitude you can never be happy. As Meister Eckhardt once said, "If the only prayer you ever say is 'thank you,' it will be enough."

I've also noticed that those sin is lust tend to be weak and cowardly, and those whose sin is gluttony (in the sense of sex and drugs) tend to be superficial and flit from experience and experience.

I've never any of them show any gratitude

I've sometimes thought fear and deceit should be two more of the Seven Deadly Sins.

I've mentioned before you cannot successfully deceive others until you've first deceive yourself, and it's easier to deceive yourself than deceive others. And for some who deceive themselves and others, it's chronic.

My particular sin tends to be sloth ("sin" actually means "missing the mark" and comes from “hamartia,” which is an archery term).

I am reminded of an Aesop's fable known as "The Wolf and the Crane."

A Wolf had been gorging on an animal he had killed, when suddenly a small bone in the meat stuck in his throat and he could not swallow it. He soon felt terrible pain in his throat, and ran up and down groaning and groaning and seeking for something to relieve the pain. He tried to induce every one he met to remove the bone. "I would give anything," said he, "if you would take it out." At last the Crane agreed to try, and told the Wolf to lie on his side and open his jaws as wide as he could. Then the Crane put its long neck down the Wolf's throat, and with its beak loosened the bone, till at last it got it out. "Will you kindly give me the reward you promised?" said the Crane. The Wolf grinned and showed his teeth and said: "Be content. You have put your head inside a Wolf's mouth and taken it out again in safety; that ought to be reward enough for you."

Gratitude and greed go not together.

Chop It Up!

I figure California should be chopped up into at least six different states, considering the interior voted Republican and the coast voted Democrat. These people have nothing in common anyway.

Since I'm originally from Illinois I'd like to see Cook County (Chicago) split off from the rest of the state. It does nothing but suck money from the rest of Illinois.

Hope and Change

Obama was supposed to be Mr. Hope and Change, but he wasn't. Whatever change he effected was not good - Obamacare, fr'instance, which is going to be changed radically since it's not working. He was eight years of being a dud, although he deludes himself he has "a legacy."

I have mentioned the three theological virtues of Faith, Hope and Charity.

I have not been able to find any information on it, but I wonder to what extent those three virtues are used by those involved in propaganda? It does appear they do, if not consciously. Or perhaps consciously.

Hope and faith are always a desire for a change for the better. Charity, if anything, is generosity.

And that's how Obama was portrayed at first: a generous man who tapped into people's hope and who had faith in him. And how it worked! - it got him elected.

Reagan tapped into the same thing. So did Trump -America first, "make America great again."

"Virtue" means "the powers of man," nothing more. Those powers can be used for good or bad.

Does not every new administration - or revolution - promise faith and hope and charity?

In a lot of cases - at least in the West, which is at least nominally Christian - most of these revolutionary movements (which are always political) are Christian heresies.

I've always thought politics was more satanic than anything else. The evidence is overwhelming. More people have been murdered by politics than anything else, and most of them through Christian heresies such as Communism.

After all, Satan offer Jesus power over all the kingdoms of the world, and He refused it.

“The devil led him up to a high place and showed him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world. And he said to him, 'I will give you all their authority and splendor, it has been given to me, and I can give it to anyone I want to. So if you worship me, it will all be yours.'" - Luke 4:5-8

Sex and Drugs and Money

Sounds like a Warren Zevon song, doesn't it? Like "Lawyers, Guns and Money."

"The highest virtues in the Scholastic tradition are the 'theological virtues' (faith, hope, charity), followed by the 'intellectual virtues' while the 'moral' virtues' are of the lowest order. The lowest of all was 'temperantia' which included chastity." - Leftism Revisited, Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn

I know an 84-year-old man who spent his career as a political consultant. He told me he's only met one honest politician. He said all the rest were dishonest and had sex, money and drug problems. Not to mention going into politics because they didn't want to work.

So I always use those criteria to judge politicians. Not to mention people in general.

Both the Clintons are perfect examples of politicians who are dishonest and have sex, drug and money problems. They are also greedy and have no charity whatsoever. That's why I have no use for them. It finally got to the point no one else did either.

Trump, on the other hand, appears to have sex problems, at least when it comes to beautiful women. But money problems, no. He's a multi-billionaire. Drug problems, no. His brother died of alcoholism, which is why he doesn't drink.

LBJ was a major horndog. He paid for a lot of whores, both black and white. And he was a terrible man and a terrible President, who escalated in Vietnam and then ran away and dumped it into Nixon's lap. He also instituted that massively destructive "Great Society" boondoggle.

JFK was also a major horndog. Gore Vidal was a friend of his and said he the most unqualified man he ever met who was President. Yet he wasn't that bad of President. Since he was killed when he had only been President for about a thousand days we'll never know what kind of President he would have been.

Sex problems aren't very much of a problem, although they can be because they can be the basis of so many other problems. Left-wing non-problems such "racism" and "sexism" and "misogyny? Those aren't even problems. There are many real problems, such as the dishonesty and obscene greed and the drug and money problems. The drug and money problems have always been considered major sins. The sex problems, not so much. The non-problems? Not at all.

By the way, Trump won because he was able to give people faith and hope. People respond to that and not the intellect. The Hildebeast couldn't do that. Neither could the 76-year-old bobble-head Jew Commie New England Yankee (that combination is the worst in the U.S) and that is why no one around could have beat Trump.

I rarely predict Presidential elections because there was no difference between the candidates. I did predict Reagan over Carter because Reagan gave people hope and faith and Carter gave them nothing except advice to wear sweaters and turn down their thermostats.

Now that I think about, most politicians are lawyers and start wars. So "Lawyers, Guns and Money" also applies to them.

"Right" and "Left" Doesn't Exist for Entire Countries

I've had people tell me "You don't realize how left this country is." I tell them, nope. The country is not Left.

Right and Left doesn't exist for entire countries.

When Johnson demolished Goldwater did the country turn left? No. And in the next election when Nixon destroyed McGovern did the country in four years suddenly turn right? No.

When Obama was elected did the country suddenly turn left? No. And when Trump wiped out Clinton did the country suddenly turn right again? If it was turning Left then why did the Republicans take Congress and the state governorships? And why does the Democratic party no longer exist as a national party?

People don't vote Right or Left. They vote their economic interest and for their families and neighborhoods. "All politics is local" is a true saying.

I predicted the Trump landslide and have written about it. It's because I know that for entire countries and cultures "Right or "Left" doesn't exist.

The real divide is between the pussies on the coasts and Flyover Land.

Swastikas Are Always Spray Painted by Leftists

"Disagree with someone on the right and he is likely to think you are obtuse, wrong, foolish, a dope. Disagree with someone on the left and he is more likely to think you are selfish, a sell-out, insensitive, possibly evil." - Joseph Epstein

I know a few people who think Trump supporters are spray painting swastikas on synagogues and on black churches - and maybe even on people. Yet when these taggers are caught they are always leftists (and their excuse is always to "bring attention" to what they deludes themselves are major problems with racism, sexism, etc.).

This of course is an attempt by leftists to portray Trump's supporters as anti-Jewish and racist (and sexist, of course).

I used to know a Jewish guy who always thought that someone sooner to later was going to paint a swastika on his house - in a white-bread suburb of St. Louis. I know another who truly believes Trump's supporters are committing these outrages and he wonders if he is going to have to leave the country (he almost got deported back to Ukraine for selling drugs, public intoxication and fighting with the police - who knocked out his teeth when they threw him down on the sidewalk).

These people truly believe these things. And their minds cannot be changed. And they are truly dopes.

Leftists always think those who think differently from them aren't merely mistaken. They think they are evil. It's leftists projecting their own sickness on innocent people.

I heard some clown on the local radio claim if Trump lost his supporters were going to riot. Yet when Clinton lost it was her supporters who rioted. It's leftists who riot, not those of the right.

If Trump had lost his supporters would have been disappointed. They wouldn't have rioted and set fires and broken windows and thrown things at the police. Instead they would have sighed, shaken their heads and gone on with their lives.

The 20th Century was the century of leftist atheism, and it's been estimated up to 200 million people were killed (by the way, the Nazis -"National Socialists" - were leftist. The left likes to pretend they were rightists and that Flyover land Lane is full of crypto-Naxis).

The late Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn (who has influenced me more than I can say), wrote that sooner or later the right "has to knock the heads of the left." He meant terminate with extreme prejudice. And he was born in Austria and lived through WWI and WWII.

People have claimed leftism is rampant in the U.S. It's not. People in Flyover Lane have too much sense. Even the clowns on both coasts don't want that kind of destruction.

Hillary Clinton is much closer to a Nazi mentality than Trump. Actually, Trump not at all.

I hope it never comes to the point in the U.S. where the heads of leftists have to be knocked. I dread the idea. It’d be what Russell Kirk called Chaos and Old Night. Which is something that true leftists relish.

The Twisted Mind of Philip Roth

I decided to re-run this to show what these loons think of Flyover Land.

I don't know how the churlish and ignoble Philip Roth remains upright, the way his moral compass is spinning so madly. The author, who made his name with the more-than-a-little-semi-pornographic "Portnoy's Complaint," which titillated a 12-year-old me and my classmates so much the teacher confiscated the book, has now with his last novel (I hope), "The Plot Against America," used this farrago of vitriol to spin himself right into a place where good is evil, and evil, good.

I'll wager that George Orwell would have seen Roth's book as an example of Lies are Truth, Ignorance is Strength and War is Peace (and in Roth's case, Cowardice is Bravery). The novel is odious, libelous and just plain disgusting -- especially the grotesque and sickening comments about a murdered baby. Maybe we need a neologism: "libelodious." More cheerful is the idea of using Roth's name, as in "He Rothed him," meaning "a truly dishonest and reprehensible man told blatant and transparent lies about a good man."

The man libeled is Charles Lindbergh, who was about as close to a true hero as America produced in the 20th century. Roth libels him as a frothing-at-the-mouth anti-Semite, and a crypto-Nazi just waiting, faster than an eyeblink, to turn into the hillbilly version of Hitler.

Roth also libels America, which he apparently believes is always on the verge of toppling into a kinder, gentler Nazi Germany. Actually, he libels everything west of New York City as a horrifying, undifferentiated mass of drooling, gap-toothed, tobacco-juice-spittin', banjo-playing, five-year-old-girl chasin' troglodytes jes' awaitin' to lynch Jews from the nearest tree.

The focus of evil in Rothworld is Kentucky, a place which to him takes up 90% of Flyover Land. I get the impression Roth truly believes that if he was to ever leave Brooklyn, everyone west of it would have eyes about an inch apart, and drag their knuckles on the ground when they weren't picking their noses, farting in church or hitching their crotches up in public. I guess he believes Kentucky is the breeding chamber for those hundreds of millions of Morlocks overrunning America.

"The Plot Against America" is actually an excruciatingly bad science-fiction novel, of a sub-genre called "alternate history." Roth should have stayed with his specialty, "autobiographical pornography written by a dirty-minded neurotic Jew who cruelly verbally abused his ex-wife and her daughter, was a drug addict, and checked himself into and out of mental institutions."

In Plot, Charles Lindbergh beats FDR for the nomination in 1940, and becomes President. Now would have happened if this eminently sane event had come to pass? Lindbergh, a true patriot who was an anti-interventionist in the mold of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, would have kept the US out of World War II. There would have been peace, Roth forbid.

Instead,in Roth's confabulations, Lindbergh instantly turns a compliant America into the Hillbilly Reich, the inhabitants of which immediately start whoopin' and yeehawin' because they don't have to send their sons to die in another European war, and instead let their anti-Semitic bloodlust, which Roth thinks is in their DNA, take control of their 70 IQ heads.

Roth will have none of this peace-mongering. He writes of FDR, who really was a semi-fascist and pro-Communist, as a great President unfortunately voted out of office by people who should have been grateful he was going to get them disassembled as cannon fodder by the hundreds of thousands.

He also cheers Lincoln and Woodrow Wilson as great presidents. Apparently, Roth has no education at all.

As for FDR, he maneuvered the Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor by cutting off their oil and sending the Flying Tigers against them in China. There is substantial evidence he knew Pearl Harbor was going to be attacked -- indeed, he moved the fleet there from the safety of California -- and wanted war with Japan so Stalin (whom he called "Uncle Joe") wouldn't have to fight a two-front war against the Germans and Japanese. If Roth knows about any of this, I'm sure he doesn't believe it. Or if he does believe it, perhaps he agrees with it.

Lindbergh, who was a fine writer and speaker, is portrayed as having even less ability to speak than the stumble-tongued George Bush. He starts a program with the improbable name of "Just Folks," in which Jewish city boys are sent into the country to be Nazified. One of Roth's relatives returns from this hillbilly Dante's Inferno with a taste for ham and bacon, the Devil's Food, which, Roth, gasping in horror, claims destroys his ability to draw and also makes him enjoy picking tobacco and milking cows. Another is forced to move to Kentucky by the federal government, and almost instantly becomes so retarded he can do little more than intone, "Do you like cookies and milk? I like cookies and milk."

Still another, a mother, is murdered -- it's hard to write this with a straight face -- "alongside a potato field" in the Hell-on-Earth know as -- brr!-- Paducah, Kentucky! Leaving her poor son with no parents at all!

Roth also spends an entire chapter on his cousin, who lost part of his leg in the war. He spends that chapter writing in exquisite detail of his cousin's swollen, oozing, scabby, and -- to Roth's oh-so-delicate little-girl sensibilities -- horrifying stump (this is when he's not telling us about his cousin's masturbatory spraying of semen all over the place as he watches little girls though a basement window). The chapter title? Not surprisingly, "The Stump."

Roth is not only terrified of the Midwest, which in his mind starts one millimeter west of the Hudson River, he also swoons in horror at Catholicism, with its "witchy" nuns and "mortician-like" priests.

And, I'll have to admit, I've never read a novel in which all those Catholic Nazi hillbillies infesting Kentucky join the Ku Klux Klan and the American Nazi Party, then break out the kerosene-soaked crosses they've been hiding in their basements, which they hurl at anyone who they think looks like a Jew.

There are even anti-Semitic riots in St. Louis, a place in which I have lived, and where the only semi-riots occurred when the German consulate hung a Nazi flag outside their window, and the gathered crowd got so upset the police had to be called. But Roth does not know these things, having created history out of his head.

The novel is preposterous and surreal to the point of hilarity. Anti-Jewish pogroms in Cleveland? What next, death camps run by the Simpsons, with Lisa as She-Wolf of the SS?

I won't give the ending away, except to say that a cackling Roth gets to engage in his version of genocide against all those inbred 'Tuckians. I'll also say he has gotten the truth backwards and upside down, and in doing so has written a truly repellent anti-Christian, anti-American, anti-human novel, one of the worst I have ever read. If he's got the ability, the man should be ashamed of himself.

At the end of his career Roth shows himself to be as he started it -- paranoid, hate-filled, envious, narcissistic, utterly self-absorbed and utterly self-deluded. As a novelist he will be forgotten. As a decent and honorable man, he never was one.

There is No One the Democrats Could Have Run to Beat Trump

Who? An ancient Bernie Sanders? Are you kidding me? He's an economic illiterate and a bobble-head Jewish Bolshevist. Just as bad, he's from Yankeeland - the Northeast. (Together all those characteristics mean "dangerous clown.") He would have lost in a landslide worse than Hillary Clinton did.

Flyover Land (where I'm from and still live) saw straight through him. We are the only people who count in an election.

The MSM ignored us and made fools of themselves. But then, I have a degree in Journalism and was a reporter and editor. I know how these buffoons think.

The MSM is starting to realize how they blew it and have now finally interviewed some people from the Upper Midwest. Michigan, actually.(One man interviewed called Hillary "a criminal." Let's see if they listen next time.)

Even if Barak Obama had been able to run again he would have lost. People were tired of him and his non-existent "legacy" - which is is soon going away.

If a young John Kennedy had run he probably would have wiped the floor with Trump. But the Democratic party has no John Kennedys in the pipeline. They don't want any, either. They'd rather run criminals and incompetents.

I've explained to people why the Hildabeast lost. She's a criminal, corrupt and a pathological liar. Not to mention an alcoholic and a lesbian. Yet I get people telling me, "If someone without her baggage had run Trump would have lost!

Who could the Democrats have run? Answer: no one. Trump destroyed every RINO that opposed him and then destroyed the Hildabeast (I'm sure when she realized she had lost she went crazy - cursing, ranting and raving, throwing things around).

Now some people are talking about Obama being appointed head of the Democratic party. Go ahead, morons. Finish off the Democratic party.

Whining about "if, if" is pointless.

These fools should get on board or get out of the way.

Van Jones: All Hat, No Cattle

I haven't watched the news for years. The only reason I've started watching the Sunday morning political programs is to be entertained watching them froth about Trump. Which is going to continue for years, so I have tons of fun coming.

The MSM still hasn't learned why no one takes them seriously. They never will.

Recently I saw the elitist leftist moron Van Jones interviewed. He's the "Harvard-educated" fool who says Trump's election was a "whitelash."

He doesn't mean a white backlash, not really. He means a backlash from Flyover Land.

I have dealt extensively with these fools, for decades.

Flyover Land is anything that isn't Harvard, Yale, Wall Street, New York or DC. On the West coast it's anything that isn't Silicon Valley or parts of LA.

Everything else is Flyover Land and is populated by inbred Morlocks who are crypto-Nazis, Klan sympathizers, religious fanatics, and wife-beaters. Every thought in their pointy heads comes from Rush Limbaugh, and if they had any brains all they'd be leftists like Van Jones.

I first heard about Flyover Land when I was about 21, in a journalism class. The class was forced to read some articles by the demented Norman Mailer, in which he wrote disdainfully of Midwesterners (of which I am one).

I asked my instructor what the hell Mailer was talking about since I had never met anyone who fit Mailer's description and he explained "Flyover Land" to me.

Since then I have noticed it in novels and even movies.

I have mentioned The Plot Against America by the mentally-ill Phillip Roth (who has been in and out of mental institutions), in which Flyover Land starts one millimeter west of the Hudson River and is populated by Nazis who lynch Jews outside potato fields. In Kentucky, if I remember correctly.

One of my favorite movies is Spaced Invaders, which is set in the non-existent small town of Big Bean, Illinois. The villain speaks in this weird half-Southern, half-Texan accent, wears a cowboy hat (and boots), a string tie, drives a junk pick-up truck, abuses his girlfriend, and is a thief who tries to steal people's land. In other words, people like him don't exist in Illinois (which is where I am from).

The only person I ever saw wear a cowboy hat in Illinois was some clown Jew from Skokie when I was 21.

The nerd who saves the abused woman goes from zero to hero courtesy of a Martian brain zapper clamped on his head. Otherwise he'd have spent his life working at a gas station.

I know a woman who considers herself "Hispanic" and who truly thinks if she visited Tennessee or Kentucky the Klan would lynch her. Yet she has friends in West Virginia, which is Appalachia, which is supposedly the worst of Flyover Land (which means people live in tarpaper shacks and the men rape their dogs) and when I mentioned where she was visiting she didn't know what I was talking about. Because her friends are wonderful people!

I tell people Washington DC is Hollywood for ugly people, and if I had my way the national capital would be moved to Branson, Missouri.

Then at least the United States would be governed with some common sense.

The United States was Founded as a Republic, Not a Democracy

"If you can keep it," as Benjamin Franklin said.

The Founding Fathers despised democracy. They knew their history and they understood it always collapsed in mass murder and and torture and mutilation and the collapse of government and society.

They wanted to put some institutions between Mass Man and the government. That's the purpose of the Electoral College. They had no interest in the democratic election of the President. Some of them didn't even want a President.

They only wanted the best to vote. White men of property, which meant those with some intelligence. They had no intention of women or blacks voting. Or Muslims, or Mexicans, or Asians.

The myth is that the Hildabeast won the popular vote. I seriously doubt that. Once you take out the million or so illegal aliens voting, Trump crushed Clinton.

And even if the vote was razor-thin, so what? Trump crushed Clinton in the electoral college.

I'm originally from Illinois and despise the People's Communist Democracy of Cook Country (which means Chicago). Why should Cook County outvote the rest of the rest of the state and take their money - which is what they do.

And why should a populous state such as the People's Communist Democracy of California have any say over, say, Missouri or Tennessee? That's what democracy does. The Electoral College puts a stop to that.

Please put out of your mind the MSM (or anybody) screaming that the Hildabeast won the popular vote. She didn't. And even if she barely did, it means nothing because direct democracy (except for towns) is a catastrophe.

The Founding Fathers knew what they were doing.

You Can Only Judge Someone on the Basis of Their Past Character

I had predicted the Trump landslide and written about about my prediction.

How did I do it?

On the basis of the candidates' past character.

Clinton, right from the beginning, has shown herself to be corrupt, a pathological liar and a member of what Thomas Sowell called "the Anointed": we're utterly intellectually and morally superior to you basket of deplorables, so we'll condescend to you and make rules that you have to follow but we don't.

Trump, on the other hand, is not anywhere near perfect, but he's three times better than Clinton. Married, what? Three times, gamed the system right from the beginning - but knew exactly what to say to appeal to over 50 million people out here in Flyover Land, which is where I live.

The "elites" (meaning morons) on the East and West coasts completely ignored Flyover Land. Now they're talking about how they completely misread it. To them Flyover Land is just an undifferentiated damnation populated by inbred hillbillies who fart in church and scratch their balls in public. It's all just Mississippi/Alabama/Georgia/Missouri/Tennessee/Kentucky/Montana/Idaho/North Dakota to them. No difference between any of it.

Years ago I had a woman (a dumb woman) tell there me there was nothing in between LA and New York except Chicago.

Also years ago I owned a taxi. Five years, actually. It was the most fun job I ever had. It was in St. Louis, the middle of Flyover Land.

I once picked up a young woman, maybe 25 at the most (from the East coast) who is all seriousness (and who had some dread in her voice) asked me if everyone in St. Louis was "really religious." You know - clinging to our guns and religion, as the outgoing half-breed homo described us.

I told this foolish woman people here were no different than anyone else. She probably thought everyone belonged to the Klan and were itching to hang blacks and Jews from the nearest lamp post.

I suggest you read (but not buy) The Plot Against America, by the mentally ill Phillip Roth. In his novel you get 20 miles outside of New York city and you're in Deliverance, Georgia, which is full of Nazis. That's what the self-Anointed think about Flyover Land - Nazis, the Klan, rabid fundamentalists who’d make everyone go to church three times a day or else in the stocks with you! That is, before we burn you at the stake.

And that's why Trump won and the Hildabeast lost.

Perhaps the MSM should open a bureau in Flyover Land. Except for the fact the MSM is almost dead, which they still don't know and will never believe.

Hell Hath No Fury Like An Unattractive Feminist Scorned

The old (and true) saying is, "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."

It's worse than that, though.

I've pointed out before one of the nuttier beliefs in the Manosphere is that attractive woman are unpleasant and bitchy. I've never seen it. The only unpleasant women I have ever met have been unattractive. Every attractive woman I've met has been pleasant.

And every feminist I've met has been unattractive. And every one of them has been unpleasant.

The first feminist I met was my first semester in college when I was 18. She was overweight, plain, hostile and loud. Those characteristics cluster together. Clusterfuck, actually.

These woman think they have been scorned because men aren't kissing their fat, leftist asses. I've mentioned that Carl Jung said women's greatest flaw is thinking they are always right and would never be happy until they gave up that belief. And if you think you are always right than someone else - men - are always wrong, which means everything is their fault.

There is a certain small percentage of women who seek vengeance on men because their lives have not turned out as they desired - and like children they blame their problems on others. Unattractive women (not all of them, of course), feminists (all of them).

I've met one than one woman who was attractive and popular when younger, then later never got married and never had children, or got married than divorced, and by middle-age their looks were gone and they were hostile - "Men are all cause of all the problems in the world! (as I've been told more than once by divorced/never-married women).

I've suggested women should not be allowed to vote unless they are married and have children.

I've also written, jokingly, that unattractive women should get free plastic surgery. Or be sterilized so they can't pass on their ugly genes to their children.

I don't blame my problems on women. But some of them blame their problems on me and other men.

It's children who blame their problems on others. Not surprisingly, intelligent men in the past have suggested women are just big children.

When I was 19 - swear to God - I had a middle-aged nurse tell me women were not the equal of men.

Women aren't the equal of men. They really are the weaker vessel. That's why you don't see them in steel mills or as carpenters.

Now some of them think the day will come when they can defeat men in mixed-martial arts. This is hubris, which is related to a kind of insanity.

It'd be a much better world if such women assessed themselves much more realistically. The Greeks called that Sophrosyne – knowing your limitations.

Unattractive Women Should be Sterilized

One of the delusions of the Manosphere is that attractive women are bitches. That hasn't been my experience. I've never had an attractive woman be unpleasant to me.

Every woman who had been unpleasant to me has been unattractive. Sometimes they've been butterfaces - nice bodies, catastrophes in the face. Mostly they've been chubby and plain.

I've always thought it was an attempt at revenge on men. "I've divorced or never-married! IT'S MEN'S FAULT!!"

Hell hath no fury like an ugly woman.

The only cure for this, that I can see, is to sterilize them.

I think it might have been in Germany, over a thousand years ago, that men bid to marry the most attractive women. Then the money that has left over was given to men to marry the left-overs.

You can forget that, at least for me.

The least wanted are fat ugly black women and Asian men. Deportation is an option. If not that - fix 'em so they can't reproduce!!!

In the long run, you'll thank me.

The Leftist Mind

I have found the way to understand the leftist mind is to think of an irrational, hysterical, hostile child.

I've had more experience with the leftist mind than I thought I would ever have, and I have found the descriptions of it by knowledgeable people are exactly what I have experienced.

The leftist mind thinks the people they disagree with aren't merely mistaken but evil. Leftists blame their problems on others - who are always racist, sexist, whatever. And blaming all your problems on others is the first defense of children. Three-year-olds. "It's your fault! You made me do it!"

They think they can read people's minds, and not only that, they distort and lie. They don't even know they're doing it. Their "arguments" consist of ad hominem attacks.

Since this is my blog I can access who has linked to my articles. I generally don't read any of the links, but this time I did.

I present some perfect examples of the leftist mind. Just click HERE.

I Called It

Ronald Reagan once said elections were not about left and right but up and down. He was right.

People have tried to tell me the country has turned left. Nope. When Johnson crushed Goldwater did the country suddenly turn left? No. And when Nixon crushed McGovern in the next election did the country turn right? No. People were voting up or down, not for themselves but for the country.

People voted for Clinton because they thought she was "up." And others voted for Trump because they thought he was "up."

People also told me the election as fixed. You know, "the fix is in." Nope. It's impossible to rig a national election.

The Diebold machines? There were computer experts monitoring these things. In my district you used a ballot in which you inked in an oval.

Even with all the Third Worlders infesting this country (who usually vote Democrat) Clinton was crushed.

Women and minorities were going to put Clinton in office? Didn't happen, did it?

I called for Trump right from the beginning. And I was right.

I've said before Trump is not the problem. He was just the vessel for the patriotic.

He didn't destroy the Bush and now Clinton Crime Families.

We did, using Trump.

And a few predictions about the conspironuts: they're still going to say Trump is "controlled opposition" or a Zionist puppet.

Guess what? They can go to hell.

Politics is Always Good Versus Evil

I don't like politics at all. It disgusts me. It wrecks everything it touches. And one of the Founding Fathers called it a "divine science," which I guess it was in those days. But not anymore.

I enjoy "political science" and economics (although neither is a science) but for a lot of people, their candidate is good and the opposing candidate is evil. Politics is always like that. Always has been and always will be.

There are a lot of people out there who think Trump really is Hitler and his followers are a bunch of dim-witted closet Nazis. And others think Hillary Clinton is a corrupt, lying old dyke/zombie temporarily kept alive by prescription medication.

Fortunately the Founding Fathers knew what they were doing when instituted the separation of powers. They studied their history and knew it well.

Traditionally Americans have given the Presidency to one party and Congress to the other. Good thing, too. The Founding Fathers did not want "efficient" government. They intentionally crippled it.

If Trump gets elected he can only do so much good (and it won't be all the much) and if Clinton gets in she can only do so much damage.

I've mentioned before I know an 84-year-old man (who was a B-29 pilot in Korea) who spent his life as a political consultant. He told me he's only met one honest politician in his life; the rest had money, sex and drug problems. I found what he said to be true. Think of both Clintons, LBJ, JFK.

I suppose I should be cynical but I'm not. It's not in my nature.

But I don't like politicians - any of them. They always lie. All of them. Republican or Democrat, it doesn't matter. Money, sex and drug problems. For all practical purposes, that applies to all of them.

One of the biggest flaws in humans is that narcissistic splitting of people and ideas into all-good and all-bad. If we didn't have the ability to do that, things would be better for everyone. And politics would exist in a form we'd barely recognize.

It might even be "divine" again.

Players and Liars and Cowards

It wasn't until college that I first met what the Manosphere in its ignorance calls an "Alpha."

This guy was indeed a player. He was also a liar and a coward and a manipulator - and you can't manipulate anyone unless they want to be manipulated. In fact, every guy I've met who was a player was a liar and a coward.

I was living one summer in a co-ed house. One of my friends was also living there, and his friend (who I will call Pat and did not like) was the player. He didn't live there but often came over to see my friend Greg, who did live there.

One of the girls in the house, after meeting Pat, told me he had a permanent sneer on his face (which he did). He did because, like all players, he didn't particularly like women). Pat preferrred men as friends. And he was one of those guys who could never be alone.

Women to Pat were just for sex. Years later I found out Pat had sex with over 100 women and had devoted his life to seducing as many of them as possible. This guy would see two and three at once - which isn't hard when they're chubby and not good-looking and not very smart.

Pat, even with the sneer stamped on his face, was actually quite good-looking.

Of course, he hit on one of the girls in the house - and succeeded.

Pat would go out of his way to seduce women who were far less attractive and stupid than he was (he once got involved with a woman with a baby, who put Coca-Cola in the baby's bottle). They fell for Pat's looks. Then when he was done with them he'd be unpleasant to them until they dumped him.

He didn't care because they meant nothing to him. They were just narcissistic supply for his screwed-up, insecure but charming self.

Women, overwhelmingly (especially when younger) fall for the surface and can’t see through to the inside. That’s why Pat did so well with women. He was all surface and just about empty on the inside, like a balloon. Women often fall for the pretense, not the real thing.

The feedback Pat was getting from women had little to do with reality. That kind of distorted, unrealistic feedback is always a bad thing. These women were mirroring back to Pat something in reality he was not. "He's so good-looking! He must be a great guy!"

One morning I was sitting at the kitchen table drinking a cup of coffee. The girl Pat was seeing (whose name I do not remember) sat down at the table and announced, "I don't like your friend Greg."

To which I answered, "What makes you think I care?" I wasn't hostile about it but instead said it with a laugh. I didn't take her seriously at all.

That didn't stop her. She told me when she was with Pat, Greg had come over and tried to get Pat to go somewhere with him.

I knew what she was talking about.

Pat had wanted to get rid of the woman and so had called Greg to come over and get him to go someplace with him. Being a coward, he didn't have the guts to tell this woman he wanted to go somewhere.

Later this girl had written Pat a note about how Greg was "trying to come between us." I know about the note because Pat, laughing, showed it to me.

So I told this girl about how Pat had called Greg to come over because "he wanted to get rid of you." Of course you know what she said. "I don't believe you."

To which I answered, "Then how did I know about the note Pat wrote to you about how Greg was trying to come between both of you?"

Then I told her Pat was a liar and a coward and he was just using you for sex and was seeing two other women and he'd dump you in about a week. I don't know if she believed me or not. Probably not.

"Now you're going to ask Pat about these things, aren't you? 'You know what Bob said about you and Greg?'" I mocked.

She didn't say anything because she knew I had read her mind, so she got up and left.

I never found out what she did because the summer was over and I never saw her again. But after about a week Pat was done with her and moved on to another girl.

I remember thinking this girl was more of a child than an adult.

Years later I realized she was deceiving herself. And when you tell me the truth they dislike you for it since they don't like having their bubble burst.

I've been writing about self-deception recently. I came to the conclusion years ago it's easy to deceive yourself and you can't successfully lie to others until you first lie to yourself.

Not only was this girl lying to herself but Pat was also lying to himself. Rationalization and making excuses!

Not surprisingly he pretty much ruined his life. That's what happens when he devote your life to pleasure, which goes up and down and is never permanent so you always have to find a new source.

I sometimes use the phrase, "When morons collide."

It's more like when childish adults collide.

The girl was childish and Pat was childish and still is. And again I will comment that he's ruined his life. I haven't seen him since college but Greg still keeps in contact with him.

I've told Greg, "I wouldn't want Pat's life" and he agreed.

When you see people as things to serve your childish desires you're going to ruin your life. You can take that one to the bank.

Such are the wages to lying to yourself. You lose any respect for others and even for yourself.

Print Media is Almost Dead

I've mentioned I have a degree in Journalism (which I regret) and when I got my first few jobs as a reporter and editor I was astonished at the incompetence I encountered (I've met reporters and editors who were close to illiterate).

All three newspapers I worked for are now out of business.

I predicted it. They brought it on themselves.

TV's not doing so great, either.

I've also mentioned that with the ascent of such entertainment as Hulu and Netflix the TV news is going to be hollowed out - and good riddance. Eight dollars a month for Hulu? About $12 without ads? They're entertainment - and why should they do any news at all?

Who takes seriously clowns like Chris Wallace and George Stephanopoulos?

In my first classes I was taught - and it's true - the media (now called the Mainstream Media) are "gatekeepers." They decide what's news and what's not news.

Not anymore.

The gatekeepers are gone, destroyed by the Internet. No one saw it coming, not that I know of. I sure didn't.

The people now decide what's news and what's not news. Anyone can open their own blog. The people are the gatekeepers now. That's the beauty of decentralization.

Now of course there is a lot of nonsense on the Internet, and some of the nonsense makes it onto my own blog with some of the ludicrous comments I get. Not to mention the out-and-out lies. But people see though it.

At first the MSM tried to fight back, claiming bloggers weren't "real" journalists. I don't see that anymore. The Internet has become too powerful.

The print media is supported by advertising. The purpose of the print in most newspapers was to provide filler around the ads.

I once made up a story - and no one noticed.

I also found most of the advertising executives were close to being morons.

Some of the journalists were incompetent and so were the advertising people. Most of them don't even read the newspaper they work for.

No wonder print media is almost dead. I'm surprised it took so long.

I do empathize with all the people who’ve lost their jobs. They were just innocent victims. But this is an example of what Joseph Schumpeter called the “creative destruction” of the free market.

I know a lot of younger kids - say early 20s - who almost never watch TV. They get their information off of their smartphones. And they don't trust the MSM at all.

Occasionally I'll watch the PBS news. There are people on it who have no business being on TV, like Bonnie Erbe and Gwen Ifill.

A lot of PBS is supported by the federal government, which it should not do. That funding needs to be withdrawn.

The purpose of government is to support the well-being of the people, not try to propagandize them.

The only thing I see as still healthy is radio - and I have always preferred radio to TV. Radio is far more entertaining than all the newspapers that went out of business - and if something is not entertaining it will never last.

I doubt the newspapers in huge markets will ever go under. I had a girlfriend in college who won a Pulitzer Prize - and the last I heard she works for the daily in Los Angeles.

But newspapers in lesser markets? That's a different story (the newspaper in my hometown, never entertaining, went under a long time ago - and the building is now empty).

The future is going to be interesting indeed. But then, it always is.

Inheriting the Rape Murder Gene

I know a woman who once told me, "Oops, looks like he inherited the rape/murder gene" about a rapist murderer. I sniggered at that one.

I've mentioned before the Manosphere is full of ignoramuses. I've read defenses of rapists as "alphas"- you know, "the Dark Triad."

Many years ago, long before the Internet, I found out about the case of Emmitt Till, who was lynched for supposedly whistling at a white woman. During the 1950s.

That's not what happened.

Till's father was hanged in Italy during WWII for raping and murdering some Italian women.

His son apparently inherited his genes. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Remember the Aesop's fable about "What's bred in the bone will come out in the flesh"?

Till was visiting down his cousins down south. Even they thought 14-year-old Till wasn't right in the head.

At a store he tried to prevent a white woman from coming out behind a counter, putting his hands on her, and she pushed by Till to go to her car and get a .38 and shoot him. His cousins hustled him off.

Later, the woman's relatives took Till for a ride. They wanted him to apologize, and he wouldn't, instead running his mouth that the men weren't going to do anything to him.

Things got out of hand and they shot Till. Yes, it was murder, and the men were charged but a jury found them not guilty.

What are the chances that if Till had lived he would have grown up to be just like his father - a rapist/murderer? Pretty damn good, I'd say.

Men like Till throughout history were traditionally lynched, hanged, shot or beheaded. That's traditionally what has happened to "Dark Triad psychopaths," which the wimp and liar Roosh claimed he was.

Psychopaths have no guilt, no remorse and no conscience. Ted Bundy was a psychopath, as was Jeffrey Dahmer.

I've also heard claims that women flock to these men in prison. Sure, some women do - nutty women. Normal women, no.

Society has spend a lot of time and effort trying to remove these men from the gene pool. It's why we have prisons and executions.

Unlike the Lost Boys of the Manosphere I have actually met psychopaths, and once met a woman (for about five seconds) who days later was strangled by a psychopathic serial killer, who had strangled maybe seven women over the years, including a pregnant woman.

I also met mother of two teenage girls who were raped and thrown off of a bridge. Only one body was found. And when I was substituting in Scottsdale, Arizona, one teenage girl was found stuffed in a suitcase one day before one class (psychopaths are notorious for stuffing bodies in suitcases). The kids were freaked out by that one. They knew the girl.

I have experience with these things, which the Lost Boys do not. And there is nothing like experience to wise you up.

I have a lot of contempt for the rabbits of the Manosphere.

There Is No Widespread Voter Fraud

The United States has over 6000 independent voting districts, none connected to any other. Yet some people, their minds poisoned by conspiracy theory, think there is a conspiracy to rig the Presidential election. You know, the Jews did it or the “Diebold machines” were tampered with (my district uses punch ballots).

Certainly there is some very minor fraud in some districts. But major, widespread fraud, enough to rig an election? Don't be absurd. It's not only an impossibility, it's an obvious impossibility.

This is the beauty of decentralization.

The Mainstream Media can howl and distort and lie all that want - and nobody listens or is influenced. They're terrified Trump is going to win - and it looks like he is.

Why some Americans are so prone to preposterous conspiracy theories is beyond me. But it's been noticed for a long time.

It's a bit embarrassing such Americans have Third World/minority mentalities (I once had a black guy tell me with a straight face that the "Klan" - which doesn't exist anymore- owned Krispy Kreme Donuts - two "K"s is pretty close to 3, I guess. Another told me HIV was created to target melanin.).

The same with three shooters on Kennedy or the moon landings were shot on a stage or there were remote-controlled airplanes on 911 or Trump is "controlled opposition" or the Titanic was sunk on purpose for insurance money or the half-breed homosexual is going to declare martial law and not leave office or the Clintons are serial killers (Bill Clinton couldn't get a blow job in the Oval Office without getting impeached).

This crap never ends.

Not surprisingly, the Bible forbids the belief that everything is a conspiracy: Isaiah 8:12-13 "Do not call conspiracy everything that these people call conspiracy; do not fear what they fear, and do not dread it."

Fear and dread really is a poison, and so is the belief in impossible conspiracies.

We've Been Here Before

We've been here before with the media lies about Trump and Hillary.

Trump is being portrayed as an unstable narcissist who's going to use nuclear weapons. Hillary Clinton, who really is an unstable war-monger, is being portrayed as temperamentally fit to be President - which she isn't.

I was a very little kid during Vietnam, but remember the news on TV: "Today 11 Americans were killed and 245 Vietcong." Statistics such as these were broadcast every day. You never forget nightly news like that.

I also remember being in class in school and the teacher asked us to raise our hands to indicate who we would vote for. Several of us raised hands for Goldwater and the rest for Johnson. Even then I thought the Johnson kids were nuts. And I was about six or seven.

I do remember the anti-Goldwater commercials. One, exactly, a very famous one.

A little girl is picking daisies in a field and then you see a nuclear mushroom cloud. "Oh my God Barry Goldwater is a psycho who's going to start a nuclear war!!!"

But it turned out Lyndon Johnson was the war-mongering psycho. He was the one who escalated in Vietnam, and two-thirds of the casualties occurred under him. Then he decided not to run for a second term and dumped the whole mess in Nixon's lap. What a worthless POS.

The media, obviously liberal even then, never accepted Nixon's election as legitimate and did everything in their power to bring him down, which they finally did with Watergate.

Trump is going to be President. And when he does the media will never accept the results, and attack him and attack him and try to bring him down. I'm already hearing talk about impeachment.

Good Lord is the MSM frothing at the mouth!

Now Trump is being portrayed as a sexual predator. LBJ was a major horndog, as was that POS John Kennedy - and the MSM never said a word about any of it. Instead we've got ugly women from 35 years ago claiming Trump molested them - and the MSM is eating it up.

But they'll never attack Hillary the war-monger.

People have finally seen though the MSM, and thank God for that. I credit the Internet, which I'm sure the MSM would close down if it could. After all, its members are intellectually and morally superior to the unwashed masses and so should vote as they instruct us.

Those days are over for good, and the MSM did it to itself with its lies. Lies do come home to roost, even if it takes several decades and tens of thousands of lives.