Saturday, April 16, 2016

Women Should Not be Allowed to Vote or Run for Office

I need use no example except for that corrupt monster know as the Hildebeast. If women were not allowed to vote she would be known only as Bill Clinton's drunken, lesbian "wife." And not scare the smart with her delusions she'd be a good president.

Only one question needs to be asked: are things better since women have gotten the vote? I see no evidence that this has happened.

Many women are natural fascists/socialists, and they put safety above all, including freedom. And since men - specifically white men - invented about 98% of everything in the world, and women have invented about one-hundredth of one percent, why should any women have any say in something they did not create and instead ultimately destroy?

Only someone who has no understanding of human nature would allow that.

Carl Jung once said that women are biologically indispensable because the have the babies and men are culturally indispensable because they created everything. Today, women are declining to have babies except they still expect men to create the culture - and "careers" for barren women. Or attempt to let them "have it all" - babies and career!

Ha! For all practical purposes it's impossible.

If women were not allowed to vote of course they would whine about not being allowed in the boy's treehouse. And they always want in. I guess they figure men are always having some kind of party in there and are engaging in a conspiracy to keep them out.

If only they knew how wrong they are.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...


Racially diverse 'new majority' set to reshape US public schools:

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2016/0415/Racially-diverse-new-majority-set-to-reshape-US-public-schools

For the first time, classrooms in public schools are filled mostly by nonwhite students. The concerns of minority parents could change American schools and education policies.

What effect do you think this will have on the country?

Cecil Henry said...

RE: Racially diverse 'new majority' set to reshape US

The agenda is White Genocide. Period. Diversity=White Genocide. ITs a crime not a policy option. And 'assimilation' is not the issue.

You can 'assimilate' 2 million Chinese and Indians in Vancouver or Toronto and what you have is a non-white city. The Whites are
destroyed and lose their right to their identity and control of their nation

That's why the push and push for non-white immigration.

Because they want to argue and create a situation when Whites have NO ancestral lands, NO right to separate lives and NO right to exist.
That is why Diversity means chasing down the last White person.

Meanwhile my Father notices (but never makes the connection) that his increasingly 'diverse' area now:

Has a lot of horrible rude drivers; disrespectful service; has to lock doors and have security LOCKS; grandkids seem to be 'outnumbered' at school!!!

Still making jokes though!!

But one promising point: When I explain White Genocide is a crime, he responds 'YOu sound just like your nephew!!!'

I had never directly spoken about White Genocide with my 12 year old nephew. But that changed last week.

Earl Thomas said...

'Many women are natural fascists/socialists, and they put safety above all, including freedom.'

Which is odd because in fascist/socialist type settings it is some of the least safe places to live.

ray said...

No vote. No public office. No judgeships, nor even judicial administrative/clerk positions. No meter-maids. NA-DA.

Females and their enablers (= the gynarchy) have proven over the past half-century that, in general, they are traitors, thugs, and thieves. Men have proven that, despite living in the richest, most powerful nation the world has ever seen, they mostly are cowards and weaklings. Few of them should be allowed to 'vote' either, as they willingly cucked-out the nation for the slightest personal gain, or merely the approval of some nearby female.

OTOH you could just stay the course, in which case I give the place less than a decade. Which is more than it deserves.

TroperA said...

The "Politicians Voting Themselves a New Electorate" thing is called the Curley Effect. Named after an ethnic-Irish Bostonian Mayor who drove wealthier Anglo-Saxons out of his city so that he could fill it with loyal Irish immigrants. While this was great for getting him reelected time and time again, it wasn't great for the city, which stagnated, since the poor Irish weren't nearly as economically productive as the WASPs fleeing the city. I'm not sure what you'd call the attempt to buy an election by appealing to the needs of the Feminine Imperative (promising women safety and provisioning AND access to the superior sperm of sexually-exciting-yet-commitment-phobic male thugs in exchange for votes.) I'd be willing to call it the Hitler Effect, since women voted in droves for the exciting, mustachioed bad boy, helping bring him to power.