Lying, Contempt and Incompetence Go Together

"Tyranny...finally develops into a disease. The habit can...coarsen the very best man to the level of a beast. Blood and power intoxicate...the return to human dignity, to repentance, to regeneration, becomes almost impossible." - The House of the Dead - Fyodor Dostoevsky

I have mentioned I used to work for a nut who was so bad at his job, in so many ways, that he got lateraled out of state. It took years to achieve this justice. Such is the incompetence of bureaucracy – it’s like one of those dinosaurs that when bit in the tail it takes seven years for the message to reach its brain.

All of us (except for his deluded boss, who defended and protected him until the end) saw straight through him. Two people told me he was evil, with which I agreed.

He was a liar, treated people with contempt, and was incompetent. He did not know any of this, being he had no self-knowledge whatsoever (his boss, who could not see what he was at all, once told me that even though he acted “like the sun shines out of him” he really was a good guy!). All of us could barely tolerate being in his presence (when he called our secretary would put him on hold and announce, “Asshole’s on the phone”).

Personally, I wanted to ether hurl myself over his desk and strangle him or leave the room. Fight or flight. When I mentioned this to a woman who knew him, she nodded and said she felt the same way.

For one example he once told me he made sure the editor of the daily we worked for "put verbs in all the headlines." The editor was a lawyer out of Yale and the nut was a high-school graduate in charge of classifieds.

He said this with a completely straight face. As I've said before, in order to successfully lie to others you first of all have to lie to yourself. And lying to yourself is one the easiest things in the world.

I have worked for other people who lied, treated people with contempt and were incompetent. All of them were fired, demoted or transferred. How they got their jobs in the first place is beyond me.

Hillary Clinton is a perfect example of what I mean. She is a pathological liar, treats people with enormous contempt (witness her "basket of deplorables" comment, which is the least of what’s she done) and is utterly incompetent. And she was fired from her first job in government, in about 1974, for lying and breaking the law.

Too bad she didn’t serve time then. It would have saved the U.S. from her machinations.

The ancient Greeks noticed these things a long time ago. They called it Hubris (which they saw as leading to kind of insanity). The Bible calls it Pride, as in "Pride goes before destruction" (the Greeks called that Nemesis).

The Greeks also had an observation about knowing your limitations. They called that Sophrosyne. You might call it having some humility.

None of this is taught anymore, not in school, at home or in church.

About the only place you can find if anymore is on TV or the movies.

I use Walter White of Breaking Bad as an example of Hubris followed by Nemesis (if he wasn't incompetent, except for cooking meth, he wouldn't have lost everything). He was a liar, treated people with contempt, including murdering them - and lost everything.

And I remember one of Clint Eastwood's characters claiming, "Man's got to know his limitations."

The problem with those afflicted with Hubris/Pride is that they don't know their limitations until reality comes crashing down on them. Even then they still try to blame everything on other people. They always have to find a scapegoat.

Bizarre that you can learn more from TV or movies than school or church.

A more common name for Hubris/Pride is just simple arrogance. I have noticed, as have many people, that the more arrogance, the more weakness is covered up. I am reminded of something Humphrey Bogart's character told Wilmer "the gunsel" in The Maltese Falcon: "The cheaper the punk, the gaudier the patter."

The bigger the mouth, the weaker the character.

I've never seen an exception to arrogance/Hubris/Pride/contempt/incompetence going together.

High-Yellow Half-Breeds

I've only met two women that I know of who were half-breeds. Both of them only slept with white guys.

The first was when I was 18 years old. She was 19, half-Indian (feather, not dot) and half-black and was raised on a reservation. She considered herself an Indian and referred to blacks as "them" and "they" and looked down on them.

Not surprisingly she only slept with white guys. I have no idea what happened to her but figured at the very least she had a child by a white man.

Also not surprisingly she hit on me. I knew the reason why: blond hair and blue eyes.

Everyone wants lighter kids.

The second one was half-black and half-white and really was high-yellow. She also only slept with white guys and had a child by one, whom I once met and who had blue eyes (she also made more than one comment about my blue eyes).

Her little girl was white. In two generations the family went from black to white.

People talk about things such as "yellow fever but I've never heard anyone talk about "white fever" except for those no-class blacks who go crazy around white meat, although they never use the term "white fever." I mean non-white or part-white women who only desire white guys. They do exist.

I once encountered a black woman who basically told me, "If I have a kid by a black man the child will be black. Why should I do that when I can have a kid by a white man?"

In college I first met a black woman who only slept with white guys (she also hit on me).

I figure no one really wants to be black and if they can't they can at least they can lighten their kids.

Some people think sooner or later we'll all be mixed and turn into a mocha mess. That's never going to happen.

White men are the most desired and Asian men and black women the least. I had an Asian woman tell me she couldn't imagine an Asian man and a black woman together. White people are of the same opinion.

In college I worked with a guy who married a beautiful Chinese woman raised in the U.S. (I met her and she clearly found me amusing). The father was opposed to the union, which made me laugh. I thought, you should be grateful the kids will be half-white, which means in the long-run putting an end to short, weak, scrawny no-dick Asian NOWAG nerds.

As for male half-breeds they look to be just a huge mess. Even Hillary Clinton said Barak Obama was lazy and shiftless.

Colin Kaepernick? What a joke (I know a woman with a white father and a Filipina mother who mocked Kaepernick as a "half-breed").

Miscegenation used to be illegal. I know why. The children belong nowhere, at least the men.

There doesn't appear to be much of a problem with mixed-breed women. But with mixed-breed men - a huge problem. The women can be absorbed into white culture and the white race but the men belong nowhere and will never be accepted.

The problem is worst when it comes to half-white and half-Asian men. They're still NOWAG (No One Wants Asian Guys). The women will be absorbed but the men won't.

I actually met the half-Indian and half-black woman when I was living in Santa Barbara and working in Isla Vista, just like Elliot Rodger, the NOWAG half-breed who went insane from lack of meaning, importance and community in his life and so slaughtered several people, starting with a couple of NOWAG Asian nerds, whom he dispatched hands-on with a knife. That's a lot of half-breed self-hate.

The Corrupt Always Lie - and a Lot

“If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.” ― Mark Twain

I do believe Donald Trump is mildly corrupt, as are Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg (I also think Gates and Zuckerberg feel guilty, which accounts for their philanthropy).

Why do I think they are corrupt? Because behind every great fortune is a great crime. That's an old observation.

However, add together the corruption of all three of them and it is a single-digit fraction of the corruption of the Hildabeast.

The Hildebeast got every dime of her money through extortion and politics. The other three were at least vaguely free market and did give people something for their money. The Hildabeast, like every politician only took and never gave.

Plus, the Hildabeast is a pathological liar and even lies when it would benefit her to tell the truth.

I've been writing about the relationship between self-deception and lying. And every corrupt person I've ever met has been a liar. A big, accomplished liar.

The entire Bush crime family is full of liars (Dubya Shrub, that POS war criminal, said he considered the Hildabeast "my sister." What does that say about his self-deception, lying and corruption?).

I I was raised in a blue-collar middle-class family. Blue-collar men are paid according to their honesty and reputation. My father was a general contractor and had an excellent reputation.

I still trust blue-collar men over everyone else.

However, when I graduated college and got a job as a newspaper editor, I ran across corruption galore - and I found the more degrees and money certain people made, the more corrupt they were - because their pay was completely separated from their productivity. Not that they believed that, because of their immense self-deception.

The free market at least minimizes corruption. Politics maximizes it. Look at the corruption in the financial markets and banks - and politics is greatly intertwined with both.

I have an 84-year-old friend (who was a pilot in Korea on a B-29 bomber) who spent his life as a political consultant. He told me he's only met on politician who didn't have sex, money and drug problems (the Clintons and the Bushes are perfect examples of both - and neither family has ever had an honest job in their lives).

Thank God the American people finally saw through the Bush crime family and used Trump as their tool to destroy their political aspirations. With any luck the Hildabeast will be the next to go.

I'd rather see a smart cab driver as President than any of the crop we've had for the last 50 years. At least their pay is related to their productivity and not their lying and corruption, the way it is with politics or anything tainted by politics.

The Founding Fathers did not want political offices to be highly paid. They knew it brought the roaches out of the woodwork.

They were right then and still are right now. In fact we’d minimize political corruption and lying if no politician could become rich through politics.

“Lying to ourselves is more deeply ingrained than lying to others.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky

Masters of Self-Deception

“Above all, don't lie to yourself. The man who lies to himself and listens to his own lie comes to a point that he cannot distinguish the truth within him, or around him, and so loses all respect for himself and for others. And having no respect he ceases to love.” - The Brothers Karamazov

I have mentioned when I was 16 years old a pudgy plain middle-aged women gave me a dirty look and locked her car door, apparently thinking I was going to jump into her car and ravage her or maybe shove a doobie up her nose and addict her. I remember thinking she was a nut who was deluding herself.

Even she knew I wasn't going to jump into her car. She just wanted to feel self-righteous and superior and to find someone to look down upon. I'm sure in her mind I was the one with the problem - a teenage boy with hair down past his shoulders, which of course meant I was a drug-dealing rapist.

About ten years after that, in college, I decided I should read some of those classic novels that everyone knows about but no one reads. So I decided to try The Brothers Karamazov.

It was a lot better than I thought it would be. I remember that in the novel one of the church fathers gave the advice, "And above all don't lie to yourself."

Just like a bunch of thoughts flooded into my mind. A bunch of connections were made.

I then realized, as I have mentioned, that in order to successfully lie to others you first of all have to lie to yourself. But people who lie to themselves don't know they're lying to themselves. They think they're telling themselves the truth about things.

When people lie to themselves but don't know it the main reason is self-righteousness.They think it gives them the right to abuse people, although they don't see it as abuse or that they are in the wrong. The self-righteous never think they are wrong. They think the person they abuse deserves it. That attitude causes a lot of trouble in the world.

I have seen several men lie to themselves to justify their abuse. But I have found women are the masters of self-deception and rationalization. That's why it's so hard to them to admit when they're wrong and instead think they're right.

I've mentioned before that Carl Jung wrote that women's greatest flaw was thinking they were always right and would never be happy until they gave it up.

I can go on and on with story after story of women I've met who delude themselves, but I'm not. Everyone knows what I'm talking about anyway, including honest women.

I was never told about the dangers of self-deception. Certainly not in church, where it should be taught.

It's not even one of the Seven Deadly Sins, although it falls under Pride or "vainglory," which are the worst sins of all and the basis of all the rest.

Years ago I was listening to an interview of the man who wrote "Defending the Caveman." He said men consider women mysterious but women think men are always wrong. He said that once when he said this in his one-man play a woman stood up in audience and shrieked, "They ARE always wrong!" I figured she was drinking and when people drink often what they really think comes blurting out.

Such are the wages of self-deception - self-righteousness, rationalization and abuse of the innocent.

The Catastrophe of Democracy

The Founding Fathers knew their history: democracies always collapse. That's why the U.S. was founded as a republic ("if you can keep it," as Benjamin Franklin said).

Today special-interest groups are always trying to register the members of their special-interest mob to vote. They have no idea what they are doing.

We don't need more people voting. We need fewer, high-quality people voting. The Founding Fathers only wanted property owners to vote.

We don't need people with IQs of less than 100 voting.

I suppose these people consider democracy to be self-rule. It's not. Ultimately it's mob rule - the mob ruling other people.

Self-rule is when you rule yourself - what the older political philosophers called "natural rights." The rights to life, liberty and property.

These days anyone can vote, no matter how ignorant and stupid. Illegal aliens voting? They should be run out of the country.

I've mentioned before that throughout history anyone with any money always lived in the hills and the mob has always lived in slums in the valleys. In other words, the mob always lives in the valley.

And history tells us the one warfare that has always existed has been class warfare - the mob versus the people on the hills.

I've also mentioned before the movie, Elysium, in which the whole earth had turned to a Third World valley and anyone with any money had moved off-world to a luxurious space-station - a hill in space.

The country of the writer/director (Neill Blomkamp) of Elysium - South Africa - was destroyed by the mobs in the valley.

Or think about The Time Machine, the movie or the novel. The Morlocks lived in the absolute bottom of the valley - underground.

Ezra Pound once said artists are "the antennae of the human race." He was right.

There is another old saying: art imitates life. That, too, is true.

What is going to happen someday is the valley mob is going to come up to the hills with pitchforks. Maybe not literally (although that, too, happens), but through political power.

That, ultimately, is what happens with democracy. And it's because of the envy of the mob, because democracy is always based on envy.

Women Lie All the Time

"You've got to change your evil ways, baby" - Santana

I have mentioned before that when I was 16 years old I was standing on a street corner walking back to high school after lunch. I had some school books in my hand.

A pudgy, plain, middle-aged woman driving a car gave me a dirty look, reached over and locked her door while at a stoplight by me. That’s the only time that’s ever happened to me. That’s why I remember it.

I ignored the whole thing, but I remember thinking something along the lines of "What a nut. She's deluding herself if she thinks I'm going to do anything to her." I had hair down past my shoulders and apparently she thought I was some sort of drooling, drug-addicted rapist who’d force myself into her car, hold my Swiss army knife to her throat and then have my evil ways with her.

Years later, after much more experience with disturbed women, I realized that in order to successfully lie to others you first of all have to lie to yourself.

Ask any police officer how many women lie to them, with a straight face, about rape.

I've caught more than one woman lying about sexual harassment. As I've said, "Hell has no fury like a woman scorned, even if they have to make up the whole thing."

Think about that nutty lying woman dragging her mattress around campus, the mattress she claimed she was raped upon. She was a scorned woman and was lying about the whole thing, just as was the woman who claimed she was gang-raped at a fraternity party (and "Rolling Stone" magazine would have never run that story if the female reporter hadn’t first conned herself into believing such blatant lies).

Men lie too, of course, but why is it women are always the ones who lie about men and sex? And their lies are so easy to see through?

Can you imagine a man dragging a mattress around in public? I can't. He’d be ridiculed and mocked up one side and down the other.

Because women lie all the time I have to give Donald Trump the benefit of the doubt. Why did these women wait ten to 35 years to go public with these accusations? He shoved his hand under my dress and fiddled with my mommy parts before he even knew my name? And in public on an airplane?

I'm sure Trump gets hit on all the time by women (I doubt this happens to Bill Gates). Trump’s not only a multi-billionaire but a celebrity. And nutty women desire celebrity, otherwise why did Mattress Girl and Fraternity Girl lie about what happened to them?

It's women who are the ones always watching the celebrity gossip shows and reading the magazines. Brad and Angelina! Only women are concerned about such things, not men.

Can you imagine a fat unattractive woman like Oprah Winfrey being popular among men? Or the masculine, unattractive Wendy Williams?

Women are nosy, envious, ungrateful self-deceptive little beasts. Not every individual woman of course but as a group they are.

This has been noticed for thousands of years. Look how nosy Pandora stuck in nose into something that was none of her business and unleashed every evil into the world.

Or look at the envy and self-deception and ingratitude of Eve.

Such stories would not have survived for thousands of years if there was not a great deal of truth in them.

There is a good reason women were not allowed to vote for a long time. Men in those days knew things about them that we have mostly forgotten.

It reminds me of something my 20-something niece told me many years ago: men are stupid and women are evil.

And men are stupid because they listen to ungrateful, envious, childish women.

Yes, the Media is Rigged

The MSM's idea of diversity is that their members look different but think the same. They’re infected with liberalism. To them anything else is not just illegitimate but twisted and evil.

I have mentioned I have a degree in Journalism. In college I found almost all of journalism students were apolitical but those that weren't were leftist, which meant they thought they were always right and that those who disagreed weren't merely mistaken but bad people. Nazis, you know.

They could never answer an argument, ran away, then stewed about their defeat. They were also big into revenge.

There was a lot of childishness about all of them.

Now as to why they were leftist I’m not sure, except they think their feels make their opinions fact. And leftists operate on their feels although they think it’s reason.

Because they think their opponents are evil, they think this gives them the right to physically attack them, commit voter fraud and try to steal elections. Fascist and Nazi scum, so attack them and keep them out office! And hope they die off!

Now imagine these people taking over the media. Don’t imagine, but instead just look around.

Since they think everyone should think as they do they don't believe in competition.

Merely listening to competing arguments really upsets them. Their brains ain’t right in the first place, otherwise they wouldn’t be leftists.

They also think their words change reality, hence the chanting that Hillary has already won so Trump should withdraw from the race.

For quite a while I was hearing that bloggers on the Internet weren't "real" journalists. I don't see that anymore because the Internet has become so influential and the influence of the MSM is dwindling.

The MSM has become a liberal special-interest group, nothing more.

The Internet has decentralized the media and decentralism of anything is always a good thing.

And the more advertising pulls out of the MSM - which is what supports them - the better it is for the people of the United States.

The Bestowal of an Unwanted Self Leads to Feelings of Shame and Humiliation

In my last article I mentioned I encountered an unattractive girl in high school while walking to a party, and she looked at me with fear in her eyes. She probably thought I was going sneer at her or make fun of her.

I realized years later she must have felt shame and humiliation because of her looks and the fact she was ignored by all the boys at school. People such as that are exceptionally susceptible to being ridiculed.

Then I wrote just about ten years later I knew a beautiful woman who was asked out by one weekend by seven guys. The first ostracized; the second had more guys than she knew what to do with. And all because of their looks.

That wasn't the only thing I encountered in that studio apartment having to with women and their looks.

One night I was in another girl's room listening to records (this was decades before CDs).

This woman was very attractive.

She told me that when she was 12 years old she had been ostracized by the kids in school. She showed me her picture from seventh grade. She was pudgy and wore glasses that sat crooked on her face.

Over the summer she lost all the extra weight and got contacts. When she went back to school in the fall all the kids who had ignored and ostracized her now wanted to be her friend, because she had been one of those Ugly Ducklings that turned into a Swan.

No thanks, she told me.

She had been shamed and humiliated and now she was the center of attention. The experience changed her permanently.

She told me ever since then she had never been attracted to what most women considered good-looking guys.

She said she was attracted to men who looked like Peter Noone.

"Who's Peter Noone?" I asked.

The lead singer for Herman and the Hermits, she told me.

Peter Noone was popular about the time she was born. How it happened she found him attractive I have no idea.

But I do know about a year after I graduated I saw her at a PR function in a town about 50 miles away. She was with her new husband, who - you guessed it - looked like Peter Noone, except about five inches taller.

I have thought about this for a long time. When people have an unwanted self bestowed on them by others they generally feel shame and humiliation.

Of course they try to replace those feeling of shame and humiliation with pride. Kathy did it by ignoring all the good-looking guys and going her own way. It's true - living well really is the best revenge. And Kathy got her revenge.

I also mentioned before I've seen a lot more women try to shame and humiliate men, including men they didn't know and had never met before, than men who try to humiliate women.

I've only seen one guy try to humiliate a women, and that was a black guy who abused in public a yellow-skinned mulatto women in who only dated white guys and had a little girl who passed for white. I'm sure he was driven insane by the fact she would never have anything to do with his ugly self (this woman also made more that one comment about my blue eyes - and the father of the child had blue eyes).

The difference between men and women is that when men feel shame and humiliation they often try to replace those feelings with pride by violence.

The Manosphere exists because of the abuse of men by women, specifically women infected by feminist ideas.

It tries to build men's self-esteem by telling them women are inferior, i.e. loveless hypergamous whores, things only interested in "cash and prizes," so get revenge on them by using them as "plates" to be spun. Don’t be one of those grotesque Betas or Gammas!

Also be a "Dark Triad Alpha," too. Bad advice all around. Very bad advice.

Feminism tries to bestow an unwanted, shamed, humiliated self on men. So, of course, these men are seeking revenge.

If feminism had never existed there would be no Manosphere.

People of Little or No Value

By value I mean the value other people assign to them.

When I was 16 years old I was walking to a party about a mile from my house. I encountered a girl I went to high school with. She was walking her dog, on a Friday or Saturday night while I was going to a party.

She wasn't good-looking at all. She was pudgy and even without the pudge she would not have had a good body. And she wasn't attractive at all in the face.

She recognized me, just as I recognized her.

She gave me a look of fear. I wondered, why? Did she think I was going attack her? Most probably not. Most probably she thought I was going to say something nasty to her because of her appearance.

I forget what I did. Maybe I said hi to her. Maybe not. I don't remember.

Later I thought, "She's not of any value to anyone." I'm sure she was of value to her parents, but at high school, no.

I've always remembered that one-minute encounter.

In college I started encountering people who were of no value to anyone, male and female. They spent their weekends alone in their rooms, watching TV.

My last year and a half in college I lived in a studio apartment attached to a two-story house. One evening I was in one girl's room, and this girl verged on being beautiful. She was putting on her make-up while looking in a mirror.

For some reason, out of the blue, I asked her how many guys had asked her out that weekend. I wasn’t even serious.

"Seven," she answered.

I was speechless. I had no idea what to say. Seven? I think my mouth even dropped open.

If seven women had ever asked me out I would have thought it was an elaborate, cruel practical joke.

The difference between the girl walking her dog and the one putting on her make-up was based on one thing only - looks.

I have almost never seen a man be nasty to a woman. Once, I can remember. I have seen many women be nasty to men, including men they don't even know. A dozen times.

I can only conclude these women think these men are of little value, otherwise these women wouldn't treat them like that.

From that I can extrapolate there are a noticeable number of women today who think many men are of little value. I find that odd since men created and maintain society. Women can't do either.

The Manosphere is obsessed with "how to be a high-value man." Its prescriptions are in many ways nonsense and in fact dangerous, since they include such words as "psychopath" and "Dark Triad."

Yet I never encounter anything about the most important things that people want - to be appreciated and respected. To be considered as having some value. To not be ignored or abused. To have meaning, importance and community.

When people have an unwanted self bestowed on them they usually end up feeling shamed and humiliated, like the girl walking her dog. I've always wondered what happened to her.

Trump is Adolescent But Hillary Clinton is an Evil Child

"The evil man is the child grown strong" - Thomas Hobbes

I heard Melania Trump say she had two children in her family - her son and her husband. I started laughing.

Trump does come across as adolescent - the rating of women by looks, the hairspray keeping his ridiculous haircut in place. That's high school, even middle school.

Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, comes across sociopathic - an evil child. She shows no guilt or remorse, is entitled, sees people as things to serve her, devalues them as "deplorables," curses and insults them, flies into rages.

I figure all politicians are immature, otherwise they wouldn't be politicians.

In other ways Trump comes across as fatherly, although it's closer to Fred Flintstone than Ward Cleaver. Clinton just comes across as an Evil Queen Wannabe and not motherly at all.

But it's looking like our coming election is between a billionaire adolescent and a destructive child.

Morons with Credentials

After I graduated college I got a job as the editor of a small weekly newspaper.

The paper was owned by a medium-sized daily that was located in the county seat. And this was in southwestern Illinois, which is pretty much Nowheresville.

It was an eye-opening experience. I was raised blue-collar middle-class and knew nothing about this kind of corruption. I knew about other kinds but not this.

The editor of the daily was a lawyer and a graduate of Yale. The publisher had an MBA from the University of Michigan.

I thought, “What the hell are these people doing here?”

Their jobs weren’t hard and local people could have done them. But local people were never hired for the top jobs and never stood a chance of getting them.

That’s when I realized there really is an Old Boy’s Network. It doesn’t mean the members are qualified. The best jobs were reserved for the Unqualified Upper Crust.

The MBA in particular was unqualified. He was a second-rater and second-raters hire third-raters and then those third-raters hire fourth-raters.

The whole place was pretty much a catastrophe – and all because the MBA from the University of Michigan didn’t know what the hell he was doing.

The MBA finally "retired" - which means forced out - when another corporation bought the paper and MBA was replaced by a man who used to drive a truck. I'm sure the business is much better-run these days.

Probably the worst thing the MBA did was hire a Castastrophe that he not only hired but defended.

The Catastrophe was caught engaging in some sort of sexual activity on company property. And he was cheating on his wife.

Something like that is immediate dismissal, no appeal. The Big Guns in New York were going to fire the Catastrophe but the MBA talked them out of it.

Still, the Catastrophe was so bad at eveything that the Big Guns were finally forced to lateral him out of state to downtown St. Louis. I think altogether it took seven years to get rid of this POS.

Many jobs require worthless credentials. It takes a degree to teach children? You can train a teacher in six weeks. As for newspapers, remember Jimmy Olson, cub reporter? The last time there were cub reporters was in the '50s.

I graduated from what used to be a teacher's college and was appalled at the stupidity of the education students.

My father was a high-school dropout and started and ran his own successful construction firm. And he first started out as a cub carpenter.

We need more people starting at the bottom and working their way up. Degrees? Many of them are worthless.

It’s Homogamy Not Hypergamy

”Only when like marries like can there be any happiness” - Gerald O’Hara, Gone With the Wind

Now why is it the Manosphere knows made-up words such as “hypergamy” but does not know accepted scholarly words like “homogamy”? Aren’t they interested in the truth instead of false, clear and easy-to-understand fantasies? It doesn’t appear so.

Where are the hundreds of decades-long studies by qualified scholars about “hypergamy”? There aren’t any. But there about homogamy.

Homogamy means “like marries like.” It’s the only way to have a chance at any happiness in a relationship. And scholars have found homogamy applies to 100% of relationships (I have mentioned an Aesop’s fable, thousands of years old, about how “Equals make the best friends.” They also make the best marriages.).

Homogamy is another word for “associative mating.” Every study ever done has proven the truth of associative mating.

There is even a 25% chance of a couple having the same eye color, which is statistically significant.

One of the biggest predictors of associative mating is having similar IQs. People with similar IQs get married and have children.

Someone with an IQ of 125 is not going to marry someone with an IQ of 85 and have children with them (as I’ve mentioned before, the functionally-illiterate moron “Muhammad Ali” had an IQ of 78 – and your IQ is set by the time you’re 12).

Not only does smart marry smart but dumb marries dumb, so with the latter we end up with dysgenic pressures.

Even with regression to the mean a couple with IQs each of 125 are most probably not going children with the average IQ of 100. Their children’s IQs will be substantially higher.

This means we are going to have socioeconomic classes sorted by IQ, which is already happening. And people with higher IQs generally make more money. And people with lower IQs make a lot less.

As funny as the movie is we are not going to end up with Idiocracy. We’re going to end up with a famous science fiction story known as “The Marching Morons,” in which 90% of people were morons and ten percent of the people had all the brains and had to take care of everyone – until that ten percent killed all of the morons by shooting them into space.

This time they’ll die when it gets to the point the white man can no longer support their sorry asses.

Honestly, what would happen if we had ten percent smart productive people and 90% morons? Would we end up like the movie Elysium, with the smarter ones living in a space station and the earth swarming with morons? Art does imitate life.

The problems associated with low IQs are appalling. Crime, welfare, unemployment, illegitimate births – all are associated with below-average IQs. That’s what happens when dumb marries dumb and has children.

One of the problems associated with a high socioeconomic level is putting off having children until the late 20s or early 30s. So smarter people have fewer children or sometimes none at all.

And these days the divorce rate is close to astronomical, compared to what it was 50 years ago.

Another problem – and this is going to be a huge one – is that when women move into a field men move out of it. That’s why there are so few male grade school teachers – and when I was a kid most of my teachers were men, including a former Marine when I was 11 years old.

Now by law women have to be hired over men. I’ve seen that several times – women, of whatever race, hired over more qualified men. It’s even happened to friends of mine.

One of my friends lost out on a job teaching economics to a far-less-qualified woman. When he sat in on her class he found she making mathematical mistakes on the blackboard. He told me he’s seen that twice with unqualified women.

I know one man who had been an officer in the military and who had an M.S. When he looked at the promotion list at work he found every one of them was a woman – eight white women, once black, one “Latina” (whatever the hell that is).

Another wanted to teach law but was told by the dean he didn’t have a chance because he was a white man and only women were hired. Like anyone would listen to Hillary Clinton or Michelle Obama teaching law (by the way, when Michelle Obama became First Lady her $300,000 a year make-work job at a hospital was eliminated).

What this means is that schooled (not educated) high-IQ women are going to look around and find there aren’t enough men for them. There are more women with college degrees than men.

And importing Third Worlders with average IQs with 89 isn’t going to help at all and instead going to hurt, and badly. Such people cannot function in our advanced society and will only bring crime and degradation.

People are more concerned with breeding dogs than better people.

People aren’t blank slates (John Locke actually said “wax tablets”). About half of what we are is genetic. Even if it’s less that’s still a hell of a lot of genetic influence.

Leftists think everything is environmental even though they don’t live with crime-ridden lower-IQs types, which shows what hypocrites they are.

We’re going to end up with wealthier people with higher IQs living in gated communities, usually in the hills and all the crime-ridden, poverty-stricken people with lower IQs living in ghettos in the valleys.

My hometown, in a valley, is turning minority so crime is skyrocketing (it’s near E. St. Louis, Illinois, which at one time was an all-white party town and is now an all-black slum. In 30 years my hometown is going to be a slum. And one of my friends has moved to the crime-free neighborhood in the foothills of a small mountain in New Mexico.

That has been the history of the world.

We’re looking at the Orcs taking over unless we put a stop to it. That’s what happens dumb marries dumb and overwhelms us with their moronic offspring.

Hell Hath No Fury Like a Woman Scorned Even If They Have to Make it Up

I do not know what Donald Trump did or did not do.

But…I don’t remember how old I was – 21 to 23 I think.

My mother worked as the night admitting clerk at the local ER. I asked her how many of the women who came in crying rape were lying.

You know what she told me?

Ninety percent. She said almost all of them were hookers who weren’t paid. Apparently they were so stupid and drug-addled they thought the cops would believe them and arrest the men.

Now I hear a woman claim when she was on an airplane Trump tried to shove his hand under her dress and fiddle with her mommy parts. Then I heard a man on the same airplane say the Trump did nothing wrong and the woman was trying to flirt with him and got nowhere. So she waited 30 years to get revenge on a rich celebrity who wasn’t interested in her.

Women lie about these things all the time, contrary to “Law and Order: Special Victims Unit.”

I’ve recounted more than once I had a woman claim many years ago I was sexually harassing her. The only explanation I had is that she was interested and I wasn’t interested in her and she was so outraged she made things up.

A few years later my boss had a woman claim she was sexually harassing her. I told him she had a crush on him and he exclaimed, “That’s what my father told me!”

Remember the woman dragging her mattress around, the one she claimed she was raped on?

Turns out she was making up the whole thing up, just the way a woman who claimed she was gang-raped by a fraternity was making it up (I’ll bet Rolling Stone is still embarrassed).

Years ago I read the autobiography of the late Ray Milland, who won an Oscar for his portrayal of an alcoholic in Lost Weekend. He practiced for the role by stumbling around the city pretending to be drunk. A woman he had rejected saw him and got a look of triumph on her face. Revenge!

Why do women do this? They’re envious little creatures, that’s for sure, and that fact is in the story of the Garden of Eden, where Eve listens to the “serpent,” a symbol of envy (men’s biggest flaw is listening to envious women and being unable to discern the envy).

And what does envy do? Want to bring people down.

Women as a group want to bring men down out of envy (what that moron Sigmund Freud called “penis envy”) so as a group they cannot be trusted.

I and many others have noticed feminism is leftist and leftism is based on envy. That’s why they want to bring down men, especially the nonexistent “patriarchy” and the “Old White Slave-owners” who founded this country.

I’ve written before you can base a fair amount of your life on clichés, because clichés wouldn’t exist unless there was a lot of practical truth in them.

And why was Bill Clinton, who is a rapist and proven sexual predator, given a pass on these things?

“Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned” is one of those clichés that all men should remember and pay attention to it.

Because if you don’t you might learn the truth of it the hard way.

”Nature hath given women so much power the law wisely gives them little” - Samuel Johnson

The Hildebeast is a Three

and the First Wookie is a 2.

Not just looks but also character.

Blogs, Facebook and Twitter

When I was a kid my father would only buy one newspaper – the Sunday paper, along with pastries and a gallon of milk. The only thing I’d read are the comics and Parade magazine.

Then, in my 20’s, after I graduated college, I’d buy the daily newspaper. These days, I can’t remember the last time I bought any newspaper.

Newspapers are dropping like flies. They brought it on themselves because of incompetence. The three newspapers I used to work for are now out of business. I wasn’t surprised. All my bosses except one were incompetent (this includes MBAs from Harvard).

Today the only news I read is Bing news – and I’m paid about 20 cents a day to do it. Then after about a month I get a five dollar Amazon gift card, which I store at Amazon until I have enough to buy something.

Instead of having to buy a newspaper I’m being paid to read the news!

Otherwise I get everything off of the Internet. To me Facebook is entertainment, blogs are entertainment and opinion (and as I written before some of the writers are close to morons). Then there is Twitter and Reddit.

Online magazines I read are the Alternative Right and Radix Journal and Taki’s magazine.

I still buy paper magazines and even have a subscription to Popular Science.

Newspapers are supported by advertising. Much of the advertising has moved to the Internet. No surprise there for me.

I don’t know why blogs are free. I only make about $120 a year off my blog. I could buy a website but they cost about what? Two dollars or three dollars a month? But I’d had to move my entire blog over there and it’s not worth it.

Advanced technology is amazing. People had no idea what Gutenberg would lead to, and I don’t know of anyone who predicted what would happen with the Internet.

Now TV news – which is liberal – needs to be destroyed. The only way to do is for them to lose their advertising.

Fat change of that happening right now. Maybe someday, though, with the advent of cheap ad-free entertainment such as Hulu and Netflix.

I can barely wait.

The day that Lester Holt and Scott Pelley and George Stephanopoulos and Chris Wallace are gone will be a day of celebration.

There is no journalism in this country anymore beyond the Internet. The MSM is a political special interest group, nothing else.

Some of my Naïve Silly Posters

It’s clear some of my posters are way too young to make any sense, especially about how “things have changed since you were growing up” or that “You’re old.”

I’ve pointed before things haven’t changed since I was growing up. Human nature doesn’t change and all you have study history to discover this.

As for “being old,” I am not old but middle-aged. And the thing about that is that I have a hell of a lot of experience.

Knowledge without experience is bullshit. And when you have bad knowledge and little experience then you’re in a hell of a bind.

I have a lot of proven knowledge and again, a hell of a lot of experience.

I can remember being 12 and wondering how it was going to take to figure things out. It didn’t take all that long.

Why? Because I used other people’s experience, matched it against my own – and found all that all the ancient wisdom was true.

You want to understand people? They’re not that complex. Try memorizing the Seven Heavenly Virtues and the Seven Deadly Sins.

By the way, “virtue” means “the power of men” and “sin” comes from “hamartia,” an archery term that means “missing the mark.” You can have power over yourself…or you can miss the mark.

One bragged how much smarter he was than me. I know people with Mensa-level IQs. They’re morons, what I call “high-IQ idiots.” They’re lucky they can start their car.

Such people tend to be brittle and neurotic.

I showed one of these eggheads how to plug a hole in his tire and my God was he impressed! I told him someone with an IQ of 78 could do it.

The fact that I am pretty bright, have used other’s experience and have a lot of my own is why I was so fast in seeing through grifters and con men and liars like "Roosh” and “Roissy” and the naïve and stupid like “Vox Day.”

One of my posters made a comment about how priests should not offer relationship advice and I immediately made the comment that priests have thousands of years of history at their fingertips.

Anyone can do it. All you to do it study that past so you can understand the present and future.

Because if don’t you’re going to end up lost – the blind leading the blind. The Lost Boys of the Manosphere allowing themselves to be manipulated by liars and con men.

You Can Just About Live Your Life by Clichés

“All truth is old and only error is original” - Will Durant

Clichés wouldn’t exist unless was truth in them. A lot of truth.

One of the reasons I dismiss all this Manosphere nonsense about “alpha” and “beta” and “gamma” and “omega” is because it’s not old wisdom and is instead ridiculous new error (which never ends).

There is also the old, truthful cliché, “Birds of a feather flock together.” That’s Associative Mating - not “Alpha fux and Beta bux” (which itself is a new, clear and false cliché).

“Birds of a feather flock together” is also an Aesop’s fable, one thousands of years old. So is “Equals make the best friends.”

Why is Hillary Clinton ten times worse than Donald Trump? Because “Actions speak louder than words.” How about “Look before you leap”? Also: “Kindness is wasted on the evil.” And of course, “The tyrant will always find an excuse for his tyranny.”

I’ll tell you something else that is old wisdom. When women let their freedom turn into license they invariably abort their children, become promiscuous and commit adultery, so then they don’t have children. Not only is that old wisdom, it’s ancient. The Manosphere thinks it’s just modern women who do this (I’ve been told several times, “Things have changed since you were growing up.” No, they haven’t.). Those in the Manosphere, as I’ve said before, are historical ignoramuses.

You can live a lot of your life using clichés, fables and myths – and those short stories known as parables. They are ancient wisdom made easy to memorize and understand.

In the not so recent past these stories were passed from adult to child. That’s their purpose, to educate ignorant children with adult knowledge in the form of entertaining short stories. Textbooks? You’ve got to be kidding. They’re about money and fame.

Instead today many people have heads full of gobbledygook and think they’re so smart because of it. They’re not and are only deluding their selves.

“Why, forsooth, because I gave credence to the words of a woman!” - “The Mother and the Wolf” – Aesop

Hillary Clinton Should Withdraw From the Race

It’s amusing that the MSM is saying Trump should withdraw from the race because Hillary Clinton has already won. It was because of what Trump said on tape about women.

Actually Clinton should withdraw because she is a corrupt, alcoholic, epileptic, pathological lying old dyke who’d be a catastrophe as President. Fat chance of that happening.

The MSM is always for the Democrat. If Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio or Jeb! had won the nomination they’d be savaged too. Trump is especially being savaged because he is an outsider.

Clinton was caught on a hacked email saying she supports open borders and that Wall Street should regulate itself because it knows best how to do it.

I heard a Clinton supporter say there is no proof those emails were legitimate because they came from the Russians.

The MSM is hysterical because no one is taking them seriously anymore. They did it to their selves. They always lie.

Thank God Trump has destroyed the Republican party and the Bush crime family. He deserves our praise for that.

Many Republicans think they’re going to lose their offices because of Trump’s candidacy. Apparently they don’t realize Americans often put one party as President and the other they give Congress. Even if the Hildebeast wins new Republicans and the others won’t support her policies.

And I also thank God for that.

Whenever politicians lose they do so because they brought it on their selves by putting their desire for wealth and power above the good of the country.

There are Quite a Few People Who Can’t Stand Me

The first thing I want to point out is that the next person who makes an Anonymous post at this site is going to have it immediately deleted. I’ve already deleted the last one.

Having said that, I will now point out there are quite a few people who just can’t stand me.

Among women, it’s the unattractive ones (sometimes downright hideous), sometimes fat, sometimes scrawny, sometimes never married, sometimes divorced, who despise me. Attractive ones have always been friendly towards me. Not one attractive woman has ever “shit-tested” me, including the ones I’ve been involved with.

It’s why “shit tests” don’t exist. It’s an evo-psych concept created by the ignorant. If it does exist, it’s the bottom of the barrel that has always done to me. It’s always the unattractive ones – overweight/scrawny, dumb. But they almost always overestimate their attractiveness to men and think they deserve someone way out of their league. And are very often unable to hide their lying and hostility.

Among men, it’s the stupid ones – again bottom of the barrel – who can’t stand me. Especially the really short ones with a bad attitude and the “little man complex.” The smart ones always like me.

It’s an example of “birds of a feather flock together.” Among men and women it’s called Associative Mating.

I’ve never really had an explanation for this hatred of me. Perhaps the brain waves radiating from my head are disrupting their dim-watt IQs. Maybe it’s the way I look (I once had a woman tell me, “You just have one of the faces you just can’t forget”). And it’s not like I look like Brad Pitt.

Humphrey Bogart (not that I’m comparing myself to him) had the same problem. He said that most people didn’t like him, and he had no idea why.

I also noticed, starting in college, that there were some women who were interested in me when I wasn’t interested in them, so they began to hate me. That’s when I realized the truth of that old saying, “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.” They see nothing wrong with not being interested in a man and if he’s interested in her, then that, these days, that’s sexual harassment.

And if she’s interested in him but he’s not interested in her, then that too, these days, is sexual harassment. When women feel scorned, their revenge a lot of the time involves lying about sex and relationships. Although to them, it’s not lying. They delude themselves they’re telling the truth.

I’ve had more than one woman tell lies about me in an attempt to hurt me. That last one was a scrawny unattractive spinster whose life consisted of looking out her drapes and before that a pudgy, unattractive divorced middle-aged woman.

If you’re nice to a dog it’s going to love you. If you’re nice to a human, who knows what the fuck is going to happen. Perhaps that’s why dogs are referred to as “Man’s best friend.”

Maybe that’s why, generally speaking, I prefer dogs to people.

The Philosopher Kings

People have a predilection to kingly government. That’s been noticed for thousands of years. It’s even in the Bible.

I think it’s because a king and queen would be the father and mother and the citizens a family. I remember when Ross Perot was running some moron with a ponytail said to Perot, “Consider us your children.”

A woman I know said she saw some guy in a crowd call Bill Clinton, “Dad.”

Donald Trump is somewhat kingly and fatherly. Hillary Clinton, aka the Hildebeast, is more of an Evil Queen Wannabe. I’m sure she doesn’t look in the mirror asking it, “Who’s the fairest of them all?” but her attitude is that is she is the fairest (such is the power of myths and fairy tales).

The effeminate Brak Yomama is not fatherly or kingly in the slightest, nor is First Wookie queenly at all. Neither of the wimpy, inbred Bushes was fatherly.

Scholars for thousands of years have argued the pros and cons of kings. They are, believe it or not, some advantages to kings even with absolute power.

Some men, very few, can handle absolute power. They never seek it out and are always of a philosophical nature.

I had mentioned the greatest of the eastern kings was Akbar the Great, who was charmed by philosophy, which in those days meant ethics and how to live the best life and how to govern the best for the citizens.

In the West the Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius is probably the best-known. But there were many others besides him, such as Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, and Antoninus Pius.

These men were ethical and uninterested in power, which is why they were such great rulers.

There are two problems with those with absolute power: the kingdom falling apart on their deaths and finding a worthy successor (Marcus Aurelius chose his worthless son, Commodus).

Why do we not have any philosopher Presidents, just idiots? (that moron Dubya Shrub once said Jesus was his “favorite philosopher”).

Because under democracy only the amoral or immoral and power-mad run for office (I once had an 83-year-old man, who spent his life in politics, tell me had had met just once politician who didn’t have sex, money and drug problems. Among the Romans, Caligula was a perfect example of that).

In democracy the worst get on top, which is why democracies have always fallen. That’s why the United States as founded as a republic (which in many ways it still is).

Ancients scholars such as Cicero and Polybius argued mixed government were best. Taking the best of emperors, democracy and aristocracies. That’s what the United States was founded on, although these days the President has gained too much power, even though we vote them in.

How to predict the future? Not possible except to look to the past. And, again, the past tell us that democracies have always fallen.

The country will survive but good riddance to the government.

I Am in That Basket of Deplorables

Recently I’ve told people I found my birth certificate and my real name is Basket O’ Deplorables – an Irish name, of course.

Is Hillary Clinton that deluded to think she’s got the Presidency wrapped up and so can insult half the nation? I guess so.

I guess she thinks everyone who isn’t a white man is going to vote for her. Unfortunately for her there are so many white men in this country that they can crush any candidate even if every non-white votes for her.

A lot of people are still deluded about that.

Enough of these men are registered but have never voted. They’ll be coming out in droves come the election. And the more are registered the more crushing the victory.

You can say Trump has destroyed the Republican party. Actually the voters did. They’ve finally seen through the Bush crime family, which was the reason for the voters’ utter repudiation of Jeb!

There will never be another Bush in office. And thank God for that. They’ve caused far too much damage to the United States.

What is the Hildebeast going to do if she loses? She will be far too old (and is far too sick) to run again in four years (and a lot of women, including young ones, absolutely despise her).

Brak Yomama has screwed up so badly there will never again be a black man (half-breed or otherwise) in the White House ever again. And Hillary Clinton will be the last woman who ever runs.

I have never voted before. I was never registered because I didn’t want to be called for jury duty (unless they wanted to pay me something decent).

But now I’m registered and for the first time I will be voting.

A Lot of Women Really Are Just Big Children

I’ve known for decades many women are big children – privileged but don’t know it, and complaining about nearly everything.

Years ago I was half-owner of a floral shop (and no, I’m not a fag). My girlfriend at the time got her inheritance and wanted to open up a shop since she loved flowers (I have a picture of her at five with a bunch of flowers in her hands). So she made the arraignments and I ran the computer and made the deliveries.

I found that when I delivered flowers the men never complained. All the complaints were from women – and almost none of them were legitimate. They wanted different flowers or more arraignments or didn’t want to pay for them or for me to come get them and take them back (which I never did). It quickly got to the point I started taking pictures of the arraignments and when women complained sent them to the floral companies. Then they started denying the complaints.

We got exactly one compliment and that from an elderly woman. That’s why I remember it.

I had noticed this childishness among many women starting when I was about 12.

Children are privileged but don’t know it – their parents take care of them and give them everything they need. But they’re never grateful, being children. What they do is complain a lot of the time. What parent has not noticed this?

I and many others have noticed men created/discovered/invented 99.999% of everything in the world. What women do is have the babies. And women are not grateful for all that men have done. Men, on the other hand, are grateful for having children.

I was once in a hospital room with a new mother (still in bed from giving birth) and the father sitting in a chair with the infant in his arms. He had a huge smile on his face. “Can’t stop smiling, can you?” I asked. “No,” he answered.

Feminism is an envious attempt to deny all the privileges of women and instead whine and complain they’re really oppressed ¬ by the “patriarchy” and “capitalism” and “old white men.” This is the attitude of children – “I’ll ignore all the things my parents have done and bitch that I’m oppressed! So I want more!”

Children also blame all their problems on other people. That’s what children do. Even some supposed adults still do it.

I’ve met several middle-aged women – not married, no children – who’ve complained “men are the cause of all the problems in the world” and “have baggage” and “won’t accept my career.”

What the hell? Women wouldn’t have “careers” if men hadn’t created this modern economy. Women with “careers” are acting like third-rate men.

In college I delivered pizzas for a year and a half. What complaints we got were from women (drunken male students caused a lot of trouble too, but that was from being drunk and obnoxious and throwing up in the pizza store).

Women were more mature when life was harder. I’ve mentioned before I’ve read several of Laura Ingalls Wilder’s “Little House on the Prairie” books and found they’re not for children and certainly not for little girls.

Laura was teaching school at 15 with just a certificate and certainly not with a college degree. And in one book she was living with the school superintendent and his wife (in a tiny, unheated room) and found his wife was sullen and crazy to the point she pulled a knife on her husband. She hated her life and wanted to go back East where things were easier.

Laura dreaded to complain about this and never even told her parents what was happening. They still figured it out, though.

By the way, all of Laura’s babies died except Rose Wilder Lane, who became a famous author. These days, with advanced medicine and vaccines (courtesy of men) the children probably would have lived.

Close to 30 years ago I told a retired man, “Women want all the advantages of being a man and a woman and none of the responsibilities.” He thought for a second and said, “You know, you’re right.”

It’s even worse today.

I’ve pointed out before that women shouldn’t be allowed to vote. Children aren’t allowed to vote, so why should women? And since men invented/discovered/created everything in the world, why should women have any say about something they can’t do?

No One Cares What the MSM Thinks About Anything

I have a degree in Journalism, which I have regretted for a long time. In college I noticed very few of the Journalism students had much brains. Fortunately most of them were apolitical but those that were political weren’t just liberal; they were leftist. They always thought they were right, were instead always wrong, and were as ignorant as hell. All leftists are like that.

I noticed the same thing when I was an editor. The reporters were ignorant and I would never allow any reporter to interview me. The publisher was a second-rater; he hired third-raters, and those third-raters hired fourth-raters. No wonder so many newspapers have gone out of business. The good journalists have moved to the Internet.

Not that has had any effect on the MSM. They’re still as ignorant as hell.

What newspaper currently did an editorial that Trump wasn’t qualified to be President? USA Today? Are they kidding? I’ve never read the paper. Do they really think anyone cares what they think about politics? Or anything?

Does any newspaper think anyone cares what they think about politics? Apparently so. These newspapers are taking themselves way too seriously. But then, they always have.

I haven’t watched the TV news in years. I had starting watching the Sunday political programs for a while but gave it up. There was some coverage of Hillary Clinton’s corruption and lying but nothing about her being sick. Mostly it was about how Trump has finally Done It To Himself. And always reported with glee.

The MSM clearly thinks that somehow they’ll have the desired effect and then the people will see through Donald Trump!

Some of the PBS programs were hosted by people I had never heard of. Not only that I had never heard of any of their panelists. Of course none of them made any sense.

I thought, “Who the hell pays these people and why?” What’s their audience? A few thousand people, if that?

Chris Wallace? George Stephanopoulos? What the hell? Again, who cares what they think about anything?

I figure most of the MSM thinks people shouldn’t be allowed to vote. Just let the MSM pick the President. What ignorance and arrogance!

I recently saw a Sunday political program discussing “elite” opinion. As always I thought, “Are they serious?” Michael Moore was interviewed. He’s elite opinion? I’ve never seen any of his movies. I don’t know anyone who has.

Oddly, Moore correctly diagnosed the problem – the anger by working people at their dispossession and the destruction of the middle class – but he thought the cure was to vote for Hillary Clinton. He also was convinced Trump was going to be elected.

At least the moderator got it correct when he talked about the disconnect between the MSM and the people. The MSM represents only itself and not the people.

Apparently not one major newspaper has endorsed Trump. What are they going to do if it becomes President? Fire all their editorial writers they way they should?

Har har! Don’t make me laugh! They’ll still continue to babble nonsense, be wrong as usual – and continue to be ignored by the public.

Most Economists Don’t Know What They’re Talking About

I have a friend who was working on a PhD in Economics but quit. He said it was “a bunch of bullshit.” At the MS and doctorate level all that it was about was an attempt to apply advanced mathematics to something that mathematics doesn’t apply, in an attempt to make it a repeatable science (economics certainly is falsifiable in real life, which economists ignore and instead make excuses).

Economics is not a “hard” science. It’s a soft one (actually it’s not a “science” at all), so those who try to predict the future are always wrong and are only right in the way a stopped clock is right. It’s not physics where you if you shoot a rocket at the moon you know where it’s going to hit. Economists don’t know where their theories are going to hit no matter how much they assure us they do.

I took four economics classes in college. I took proficiency tests for Introduction to Micro and Macro and made an A and a B. The dean came out and shook my hand and said what I had done was almost impossible. Then I took Intermediate Macro and Micro as classes, thought, “This is a bunch of crap” and never took another class.

One doesn’t need any classes at all to understand basic economics. All you have to do is study the basic concepts, think about them, and then understand them. Beyond that, you don’t need much.

When I was about 21 years old I was on an Amtrak listening to the guy behind me. He was clearly working on a PhD in Economics because he was babbling nonsense. “Cost-push” and “demand-pull” inflation” and other nonsensical concepts (inflation is an increase in money and credit, nothing else). And he was so confident in his delusions. I remember just shaking my head.

I don’t listen to any economists. I haven’t for decades. Again, they babble nonsense. It used to be economists analyzed the economy to find out how it worked. That’s what Adam Smith did. Now they invent nonsensical concepts and then try to apply them.

About a year or so ago I read an article by a Jewish economist, all of whom are incompetent (I once had a retired college professor refer to economics as “Jewish engineering,” which is an oxymoron if there ever was one – the first nothing but a soft science and the second a hard science).

This fool was babbling that if we had completely open borders “world GNP would double.” See what I mean by incompetent? It wouldn’t double; it stagnate or go down, because when you have different tribes trying to share the same land you what you end up with is fighting and murder. Look at all the crime non-Western immigrants have brought to the U.S. (every day when I turn on the news I always wonder, “How many Americans have Muslims murdered today?”).

An economist may have a genius-level IQ but no common sense (I refer to such people as “high-IQ idiots”). Paul Krugman is a perfect example of one.

Krugman decided to become an economist after reading Isaac Asimov’s Foundation Trilogy which I read when I was 12 and even then knew some of the concepts in it were nonsense, such as the “psychohistorian” Hari Seldon predicting the future of the Galaxy ten thousand years courtesy of a hand-held calculator.

Clearly Krugman thinks he’s a modern-day Hari Seldon. What he is, instead, is deluded and incompetent. His opinion on anything should be dismissed (he still thinks the government can spend the country into prosperity by increasing the deficit).

Most economists are globalists, which means they don’t have a clue that sending our knowledge and wealth to China would lead to them stabbing us in the back, just the way they didn’t have a clue about us sending our wealth and knowledge to the Middle East for their oil would lead to the same back-stabbing (we sent money and material to the Soviet Union during WWII and they responded by another back-stabbing, which is why we ended up in Korea and Vietnam).

This is what comes of having no common sense.

The reason you never hear of OPEC anymore is because the U.S. destroyed it by becoming more energy-independent (and we are going to be completely energy-independent in several more years). And when I was in my teens OPEC was always in the news because the cost of gas had skyrocketed (meaning from 32 cents a gallon to over a dollar), gas stations were closed on certain days and cars had to wait in line for an hour, which led to fights between drivers. When’s the last time you saw that? When I was a teenager, that’s when. Those days are gone.

I can remember when Carter wore sweaters in the White House and turned down the thermostat and urged everyone else to do the same. To save oil because we were running out of it (apparently we have only used 1% to 2% of the oil and natural gas in the world).

Economics used to be called “political economy” because it was a combination of economics and political science. That was more realistic.

What’s even more realistic is to take into account culture, race, religion and ethnic group (the idea that Africans, with a mean IQ of 70, are going to survive and flourish in countries that have a mean IQ of 100, defies all common sense).

That reminds me that “Muhammad Ali,” (who unwittingly named himself after the biggest Muslim slaver of his era) who had an IQ of 78 in high school, was listed as “borderline retarded” and admitted he could barely read and write. I’ve dealt with many such stupid people and have found they can’t add or subtract either. “Five take away seven” leaves them dumbfounded.

I recently read an article that Trump’s father told him his family’s success was genetic, and that Donald Trump said he inherited his “good brain.” And Trump is German/Swedish.

I’ve read quite a few older novels, such as Gone with the Wind and The Shepherd of the Hills, and there were comments in them about how people were more concerned with breeding horses and dogs than better people.

Flooding the country with people of different races, different religions, different ethnic groups and different cultures is going to have decided dysgenic effects on the United States and Europe. It’s already started in Europe, which has lead to a backlash. One that’s going to get a lot worse.

Not that “professional” economists understand this. And that’s one of the main reason they don’t know what they’re talking about and why I ignore them. They think people are just interchangeable workers, like cogs in a machine.

Talk about deluded.