And it's because I know 80% of women are unattractive.
Years before I got on the Internet I took my two yearbooks (junior and senior years) and figured the percentage of girls who were attractive. Twenty percent in both books. I thought, that's Pareto's 80/20 law. Which, by the way, has been proven over and over.
More than once I've sat in various places and rated the women. Once they reach a certain age, it's more like 95% unattractive.
Now when I starting reading Manosphere I started laughing. I thought, these guys have no experience.
I've seen many women who reached their peak at 16 and 20 years later were unrecognizable.
80% of woman cannot get these so-called "Alphas." They can't engage in "Alpha Fux and Beta Bux" (who came up with these hallucinations, anyway?).
Almost everyone engages in Associative Mating. Many studies have been done on this and people not only end up with similar IQs but similar ear size. And I've half-a-dozen women who could have been sisters - and who looked like me - look at me and instantly go "Hmm..."
I know many women - and some of them were major sluts - who never got married. They never will, either. And I've known many women who got divorced - and some of them were quite good-looking when younger - and found they could not find anyone. Then they got hostile and angry and tried to hurt every man they encountered - because they believed men were the cause of all their problems.
Many years ago I met a woman who was a women's therapist. She told me most of her patients were unattractive women who couldn't find anyone. She told me about all she could do is put them on anti-depressants and anti-anxiety medication - and about half the women I know are on one or both. Unmarried and divorced - all of them.
It's astonishing the number of women out there who are damaged goods.
Fortunately the vast majority of these nonsensical Manosphere concepts will fade away. As to when, who knows?
'It's astonishing the number of women out there who are damaged goods.'
ReplyDeleteYou can start with the overall feminist mindset being touted as normal or 'empowering'.
Then add the number of them who had an abortion, it was a lot more than I initially conceived.
Add onto that contraceptives and promiscuity.
Go back further their family life growing up...how many divorces or single mothers were there. Not only family breakup but the chances a stepdad or boyfriend doing things to her also goes up.
80/20 might be a generous assumption between damaged/not damaged.
ReplyDeleteMany women these days do not seem to understand that most, if not all, of their appeal and attractiveness to men is "front-loaded" in their lives, no matter how successful of a career they might have.
A woman at 30 or 35 will not have the same number, type and pool of men to choose from for marriage as she did at 20. Unlike men, women do not get better with age in their appeal to men. Men as they age, if they are conscientious, can more easily retain and even increase their physical appeal to women, and obviously their wealth and status can increase with age which are also more appealing to women as well.
Young women, especially the more attractive ones, are constantly bombarded with stupid men supplicating and kissing their asses, and giving them anything they want - and they think this attention will last forever. But one day eventually it will stop, and men that they would never even have given them the time of day to will ignore and not want them. They will become invisible to men.
I would put at 95% of women out there are damaged goods.
ReplyDeleteConversely, I would have to state that probably 95% of men out there are damaged goods also. (Including myself, when I'm feeling brutally honest. Or bleak.)
ReplyDeleteDefine "damaged." I think the meaning is different for each sex. They become damaged differently, in different ways.
What does it mean to be a "damaged" woman?
What does it mean to be a "damaged" man?
How does each get that way?
I find the manosphere to be mostly on target, most of the time actually. The problem is that they overdo it, always. They just go too far with their theories.
ReplyDelete