I define pornography as when you turn the other person into a thing to be degraded for your power and pleasure.
I had a man tell me recently he and his wife had found their eight-year-old nephew had bookmarked 106 porn sites. The bookmarks were erased and an adult filter was enacted.
The kid thew a fit and tried to get around the filter, but couldn't do it. His parents had a long talk with him. He didn't say much and had no explanation as to why he did what he did. Personally I consider him a little odd although he appears to be very intelligent.
I wonder what kind of permanent changes his brain might suffer?
Now when I was a kid just about all we had was Playboy. And I wasn't really interested in about such things until I was 12.
We used to find pornographic magazines on the side of the road or along the railroad tracks by my house, but after looking at them ("What exactly are they doing here?") we threw them away.
I never saw a pornographic movie until my first day of the senior year in high school, when we went to some guy's house and he set up a 16 mm projector and showed us some b&w films. It got boring real fast.
But now we have the internet and porn is everywhere.When I was a kid it was always hidden and not public.
The ancient Greeks, with their usual intelligence and perspicacity, banned representations of brutal public humiliation from their theater as obscene – and the original definition of obscene meant something that should not be shown in public. And that is what a lot of modern pornography is.
There are those in the Manosphere who complain about the great availability of porn and the bad effect it's having. They apparently have a point.
Porn had been around for thousands of year but now we are being inundated with it. It does make me wonder what happens to children raised with the stuff. I don't think it will be a good thing.
Men's pornography is visual but women's pornography are romance novels. The first time I told a woman that she threw a seizure. She just refused to believe it.
Chris Hedges, who is mostly known as anti-war writer, is extremely anti-porn. I think he goes too far but here is a long article he wrote about his beliefs.
Click HERE.
By the way, I have known for a long time where the sadistic Manosphere delusions about women being loveless disloyal hypergamous whores seeking "cash and prizes" leads. No place good.
16 comments:
Heh. If the kid is bright enough, nothing short of moving the computer away to the living room will work. Or cutting off the Internet altogether.
It might even provide some motivation for learning this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-booting
and some form of data encryption, like one of examples:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeOTFE
If it's a jailbroken mobile, then it's even easier.
'I have known for a long time where the sadistic Manosphere delusions about women being loveless disloyal hypergamous whores seeking "cash and prizes" leads to. No place good.'
It makes me wonder:
1) How many of these guys degraded women for their own power and pleasure.
2) How many of these guys had their tactics thrown right back into their face by said women.
Regarding women being loveless and hypergamous whores:
Esther Vilar in her book: The Manipulated Man, writes about women having no feelings (at least for men I suppose).
Women are generally cold and calculating towards men that they get involved with, evolution and survival required this feature in them. A woman needed to coldly evaluate a mans' ability to provide for her and her children, without any romantic feelings for the man interfering. If she did fall in love and became too attached to a man who could not provide, became sick, injured or killed, it could jeopardize her childrens' and her own survival.
Esther Vilar was a Jew, just like another fraud...Sigmund Freud. Both were describing Jewish culture.
"Very few women are capable of empathizing with men. There are about as many women who have the ability to empathize with men as there are children capable of empathizing with adults.
This is what most men fail to grasp, and why they go round and round in circles trying to "explain things" to women. Women just don't care. We are here for their purposes, not ours.
"Women have no sympathy... And my experience of women is almost as large as Europe. And it is so intimate too. Women crave for being loved, not for loving. They scream at you for sympathy all day long, they are incapable of giving you any in return for they cannot remember your affairs long enough to do so." -- Florence Nightingale"
http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2006/01/very-few-women-are-capable-of.html
I am well aware of that quote by Nightingale...which was said during some ghastly wars. Might as well assume men's true nature is that which is created by war.
Both men and women are capable of doing both good and bad things obviously.
I'm intrigued by female nature. Women do not think or feel like men.
Diana Davison ("Feminism LOL" on youtube) has some youtube videos on female nature that are interesting:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVRQqUgDRBevsDGOeE1DL3A/videos?spfreload=10
Depending on how they're raised, women can be sluts or they can be good wives.
I'd start looking into other adults or young people in the child's life in a kid that young is looking at porn with any intensity.
As I understand it, IANAD This can mean some kind of sexual abuse,
Also while this website has a somewhat overwrought the basic points about puberty are true.
http://www.stopkillingmykids.com/the-early-puberty-crisis/
puberty is getting earlier and while it was often 12 in warm states, 14 in colder with more adult characteristics to come later its possible that the child is actually starting earlier.
The idea that it is nutrition is unlikely, its probably estrogen mimics and other pollutants.
That said, it is a parents job to police children s viewing habits, an annoying fact of modern life but keeping filthy like porn or P.C agitprop like Disney away from kids is important.
'Esther Vilar was a Jew, just like another fraud...Sigmund Freud. Both were describing Jewish culture.'
There is a lot of that projection.
It's amazing the number of people who fall for their nonsense. Marx was the worst. Freud, too, as I said. And "Ayn Rand," for that matter.
Well there's narcissitic personality disorder, tyranny, and neuorsis and then there's the Jewish way of life.
I refer to "Atlas Shrugged" as the Talmud Lite.
"As I understand it, IANAD This can mean some kind of sexual abuse,"
No sexual abuse, but his mother is single and he splits his time between her and his father and his wife. He doesn't like the latter.
He's not right, of course.
It's weird, that feminists are lockstep behind denouncing the depiction of fictional women in nerd stuff like videogames and comic books (which is mostly PG13 cheesecake stuff) but are ambivalent about porn. Porn has been guilty of the sex trafficking and abuse of actual flesh and blood women, particularly those in poorer countries.
PUAs? I would agree with the post, but what percentage of people who try this stuff even with some success will actually become satyromaniacs? There has to be some preexisting problems at work to produce a Roosh or a Roissy. My only real problem with Roosh, etc. is that I don't his book is very good. But things are so stacked against young men that if a book at least gives someone the confidence to go out and start interacting, I can't personally condemn it even if it's 90% garbage. 20 out of 1000 may be awful, but it's better than 0/0.
Post a Comment