tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post5257197147212222166..comments2024-03-22T11:14:05.861-04:00Comments on UncleBob's Treehouse: There are Only Two PartiesAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16046202647270439670noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-2295017333511281252017-02-26T04:55:05.741-05:002017-02-26T04:55:05.741-05:00Bob political parties are meaningless. I know you...Bob political parties are meaningless. I know you don't like to believe that all your fighting for "conservatism" was a damned waste of time, but we all know it was. They weren't really fighting. Its all one big club. They all work for the banksters. They are all out for the Almighty Dollar. Maybe Reagan really did love America, but it didn't matter. He got shot and Rockefeller put Bush in as VP to make sure it was tax cuts for the Rich and NOTHING ELSE.<br />Politics is warfare by other means, and both those wings are against YOU. Don't try to rationalise it, cause you know its true. Its not cynicism. Reagan signed MLK day into law, and Affirmative Action was Nixon and Reagan not just JFK and LBJ.<br />They're whores. Bought and sold. Souled out. And Cheap Whores at that. They're worse than traitors Bob. They're whores. No ideology. No principles. No side at all.<br />Trump isn't gonna cut it either. Politics is war by other means, but this system as weak and tottering as it is, is still agin you and your kin. I always preferred the real Thing. Its more honest, and straightforward. You don't have to deal with wordsmiths and lawyers. It ain't sentimental and full of sweet marmalade claptrap. This is mine and it ain't yours. Run or fight.<br />War isn't a bad thing if you fight for freedom and YOUR INTERESTS Bob.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10330477950146402313noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-43046110365659998832017-02-25T19:39:49.959-05:002017-02-25T19:39:49.959-05:00When I've heard people refer many years ago to...When I've heard people refer many years ago to a certain political party as "pro-business", I've had to ask what other kind of political party would make sense to them ...<br /><br />Pro-failure perhaps? Maybe pro-collapse? Pro-gridlock? Pro-self-emasculation?<br />Pro-incompetence? Pro-ignorance? Pro-stupidity? Pro-apathy?<br /><br />And so I see only one political party that would ever matter, whatever its name, which pays attention to economic matters and implements political actions based on an inability of the economic matters to affect policy directly.<br /><br />Thus the only question is literally as well as figuratively whether "The Establishment Party" works for you or not.<br /><br />Right now what passes for it does not represent my economic concerns for the most part, which is why I'm not above the idea of shopping around for one that's a closer match.<br /><br />If that shopping around for a closer match leads me out of the country, that's the country's loss, not mine. If the better deal exists elsewhere, it's a loss for the country anyway, given enough time and enough movement of capital. People are not even remotely close to being entirely rational actors, and all it would take is enough of a forward-looking promise that things are going in the right direction.<br /><br />That's what mass migrations to A Better Tomorrow have always been about.<br /><br />But what better explanation for such things as the recent German gold repatriation can you find than "your Establishment Party no longer works, and so we can't trust you with our future either"?Post Alley Crackpotnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-40285073448316901312017-02-25T13:45:49.437-05:002017-02-25T13:45:49.437-05:00The crystal clear insight of this post is stunning...The crystal clear insight of this post is stunning. The threat Trump represents will draw unrelenting attacks indefinitely. His assault on regulations which give unelected officials judicial, legislative and executive powers is unprecedented. Stripping this power from the bureaucrats would be enormous, but only a start. <br /><br />Dismantling the Central Bank would be a plus, but eight years is just not enough time.<br /><br />http://manningthewall.com<br />https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUDY17Xg_Ix5kaenkryh63g<br />https://twitter.com/manningthewall<br /> Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15686209074963298974noreply@blogger.com