tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post4519688120646595000..comments2024-03-22T11:14:05.861-04:00Comments on UncleBob's Treehouse: "Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married"Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16046202647270439670noreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-45145390660757843652015-03-29T10:50:54.012-04:002015-03-29T10:50:54.012-04:00"The second biggest mistake men make is genuf..."The second biggest mistake men make is genuflecting on bended knee, ..."<br /><br />Men supplicating to women is perverse in my opinion. It is women who should be qualifying themselves to, and proposing to men for relationships and marriage, not the other way around as it is thought of today.<br /><br />It's a lot harder for a man to build himself up into an appealing man for women, than it is for women to be appealing to men. What women offer men and what they find appealing is pretty much fixed: Looks, youth, and pleasant personality, everything else is secondary (achievement, education, etc.) (e.g., Rosie O'Donnel having a masters degree from Harvard will not compensate for her shitty looks and personality and help give a man a chubby - at least to me).<br /><br />I believe it is men, who have built themselves up through education and achievement, and have virtue, who are the actual "prize" and not women. The social problems today are due to that women are being pedastalized when it isn't warranted. Women tend to have big egos and are narcissistic, which is fed by this behavior.<br /><br />I remember reading an article on dating where it talked about how in the past, the 1950's and before, where women were concerned and focused on finding and attracting a quality man, and getting him to choose her (the saying: "Women chase the man that she wants, then she lets him catch her.").<br /><br />Young men should focus on their education and achievement rather than chasing women. Quality men don't need to chase women, the women chase him, and present themselves to the man for selecting. A quality man, if he has built himself up properly and has virtue, should have plenty of women interested in him. From my own experience, I find that when women learn about me, they seemingly "come-out-of-the-woodwork," so to speak, and come on to me. Every relationship that I have had so far, the woman was the initiator.<br /><br />@Bob: Maybe this is a good topic for a blog article, if you did not already address it, and if your interested?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-33054609743624440502015-03-17T08:19:09.379-04:002015-03-17T08:19:09.379-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Mindstormhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02949097462978386911noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-7337198309721822902015-03-17T08:19:09.034-04:002015-03-17T08:19:09.034-04:00https://unterrorist.wordpress.com/2015/01/07/purpo...https://unterrorist.wordpress.com/2015/01/07/purpose-of-this-blog/ - the comic strip there illustrates what comes when women are given Animal Farm style 'equality' and freedom from being judged. The difference is that others suffer as well.Mindstormhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02949097462978386911noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-37794421631588051642015-03-15T14:21:01.800-04:002015-03-15T14:21:01.800-04:00"Why not just live the way you did when you w..."Why not just live the way you did when you were in college? Things seemed to work out fine then (and video games are much nicer looking now to boot!)"<br /><br />This is just a rational response to the decline of civilization. You wouldn't be helping to maintain civilization by continuing to slave away making money that is then taxed away to support a bloated and ever increasing welfare state.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04704506021329262577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-9055320654533768422015-03-14T17:01:24.580-04:002015-03-14T17:01:24.580-04:00"back in college (late 80’s, early 90’s)"...<b>"back in college (late 80’s, early 90’s)"</b><br /><br />Dusty, why are you wasting your time commenting here? No family to care for, no cats to feed?<br /><br />No amount of shaming would force anyone to touch you with a 6' pole.Mindstormhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02949097462978386911noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-86076628555078320792015-03-14T13:21:52.312-04:002015-03-14T13:21:52.312-04:00"I've never heard of a man deceiving a wo..."I've never heard of a man deceiving a woman to get married."<br /><br />Then you haven't been paying close attention.<br /><br /><br />"Many women play the chameleon all the time. It's their modus operandi."<br /><br />Ok, prove it. Offer data that decidedly proves that women compared to men are more prone to play "chameleon".<br /><br /><br />"Why not just live the way you did when you were in college? Things seemed to work out fine then (and video games are much nicer looking now to boot!)"<br /><br />Thanks, TroperA, for contributing to the decline of civilization. But, hey, opting out is your choice.<br />MGTOW'd Outnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-23330708174306814902015-03-14T11:10:35.202-04:002015-03-14T11:10:35.202-04:00"Revised for accuracy.
The problem is a pers..."Revised for accuracy.<br /><br />The problem is a person sometimes really know what kind of husband/wife they have."<br /><br />I've never heard of a man deceiving a woman to get married. Men that do this are an anomaly. Many women play the chameleon all the time. It's their modus operandi. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-2388332740681986022015-03-14T10:33:49.077-04:002015-03-14T10:33:49.077-04:00'Are men nothing but workhorses to women?'...'Are men nothing but workhorses to women?'<br /><br />It's probably the flip side question to where women ask if they are nothing but sex dolls to men.<br /><br />This is what happens when you separate a person's humanity from their utility. The hearts of many grow cold. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16190484330802907362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-38581481225027113942015-03-14T07:54:40.597-04:002015-03-14T07:54:40.597-04:00"a) Charismatic men who were good physical sp..."a) Charismatic men who were good physical specimens (with presumably good sperm.)"<br /><br />It's been found that best sperm belongs to the most intelligent men, which, is one of the reasons this Alpha/Beta, "Alpha Fucks and Beta Beta Bucks" is nonsense, as I predicted a long time ago.<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16046202647270439670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-76750566081425014252015-03-14T03:54:59.157-04:002015-03-14T03:54:59.157-04:00Sex is a commodity.
Women used to know this, ther...Sex is a commodity.<br /><br />Women used to know this, therefore they would only reserve it for <br /><br />(a) Charismatic men who were good physical specimens (with presumably good sperm.)<br /><br />or<br /><br />(b) Not so charismatic men who were good providers.<br /><br />Enter feminists and social engineers. Thanks to laws and social changes, women were freed from having to marry (b) men and could instead shack up with (a) men.<br /><br />(b) men were still left to pay the bill for women's children, thanks to child support, alimony and transfer payments via taxes.<br /><br />(b) men have gradually come to realize that they're getting the short end of the stick and so have opted out of marriage and the big-paying jobs they would have needed to support a big household. Why work 80 hours a week to support a family which you never get to see (and a wife who wouldn't give up sex to you if a gun were placed to her head?) Why not just live the way you did when you were in college? Things seemed to work out fine then (and video games are much nicer looking now to boot!)<br /><br /> Feminists and social engineers are finally stumbling upon the fatal flaw in their plan--that their utopian schemes relied on an army of schlubs paying the kind of taxes that propertied, workaholic married white men used to pay. The schlubs aren't "showing up for work" and no amount of shaming is going to make them.<br /><br />The only recourse the government has is to imprison men and force them to work (something the government can only do now via Child Support.) But just you wait. Soon bachelorhood will be a crime and each of you men will be issued your own crayola-haired, tatted landwhale to provide for by the State...TroperAnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-32389436393462921562015-03-14T00:38:03.811-04:002015-03-14T00:38:03.811-04:00Honestly, fuck the USA.Honestly, fuck the USA.Jimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-88284950997338248632015-03-13T20:28:49.843-04:002015-03-13T20:28:49.843-04:00New Report: 48% of First Children Born to Unwed Mo...<a href="http://cnsnews.com/news/article/new-report-48-percent-first-children-born-unwed-mothers" rel="nofollow">New Report: 48% of First Children Born to Unwed Mothers</a><br /><br />That is from 2013. Given that this somehow made it to the mainstream news back then, we can pretty-much figure that it was underreported at the time - the media does toe the line about some things. It being 2 years on, I do not for an instant believe that it is under 50% now.<br /><br />These single mommies are whores, pure and simple. No, they may not get paid directly and upfront for their bodies in a simplistic transaction: no $100 love you long time here. They must maintain plausible deniability.<br /><br />Instead they expect to be paid sub-rosa in the coin of: dinners, drinks, nights out, romantic escapes, vacations, and "I've come up a little short for X bill, can you help me?" With a fake-guilty look on her face.<br /><br />When they get knocked up: government handouts and child-support, plus moral validation and ego-stroking for being a brave, battling single mommy. This appears to be the lifestyle of the modern long-term whore. There is no surprise that 70% of younger men are not married.<br /><br />I find it bleakly amusing and ironic the furor about prostitution, in the face of this sub-rosa and very profitable long-term prostitution. The sub-rosa whores are upset about the more honest and upfront whores. If the men start using the more honest and upfront whores, the sub-rosa whores lose out.<br /><br />I begin to think that the whole bushwa about how women "can't find a man" and the decline of men, etc is nothing more than a smokescreen. If a woman really wants a man and marriage - she'd get it. By throwing up a smokescreen and shedding crocodile tears they can maintain plausible deniability, play the victim card, <i>and</i> get their sub-rosa prostitution game-plan all at the same time.<br /><br />Plus, women love any excuse for drama and bitching.Black Poison Soulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07378635809751908950noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-36377147754688735112015-03-13T20:12:13.041-04:002015-03-13T20:12:13.041-04:00RICanuck says,
Neither the article nor any of the...RICanuck says,<br /><br />Neither the article nor any of the commenters here mentioned student debt. Any man willing to marry a woman with$50k to $100k debt is setting himself up for debt slavery and childlessness. Why bother?<br /><br />The article did mention women's education, but not debt. But, if the authoress is so educated, how come she doesn't the difference between morays and mores? How come none of the 'educated' editors, proof readers, and fact checkers caught it either?<br /><br />A young white American man with middle class and family aspirations has a choice. A deeply indebted uneducated but credentialed woman, or trailer park trash. Some choice.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-55601162776868335852015-03-13T19:58:23.655-04:002015-03-13T19:58:23.655-04:00Revised for accuracy.
The problem is a person som...Revised for accuracy.<br /><br />The problem is a person sometimes really know what kind of husband/wife they have. Some people are notorious for changing after marriage, both physically (e.g., not maintaining weight and getting fat) and in personality for the worse. Some people are also known to not show their true face when dating, only until after marriage are their true personalities unmasked.<br /><br /><br /><br />MGTOW'd Outnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-71418829392163185052015-03-13T18:43:06.276-04:002015-03-13T18:43:06.276-04:00"When you have this many people unmarried, th..."When you have this many people unmarried, this many people divorced, so many babies not being born, the economy this bad...there is a big problem."<br /><br />And this is why I keep climbing back up to Uncle Bob's Tree House. This man knows.<br /><br />BTW, I'm:<br /><br />"The biggest mistake..."<br /><br />"Reply, Part One:" and ...<br /><br />"Reply, Part 2:"<br /><br />Thanks for all you do, Mr. Wallace. Thanks for creating this site. Many respect the open forum you've created.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-27452577000867656712015-03-13T18:19:50.221-04:002015-03-13T18:19:50.221-04:00"When you have this many people unmarried, th..."When you have this many people unmarried, this many people divorced, so many babies not being born, the economy this bad...there is a big problem."<br /><br />Also, many of the babies that are being born are to unwed, single mothers, with no father present.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-51003670922244087072015-03-13T18:11:48.930-04:002015-03-13T18:11:48.930-04:00When you have this many people unmarried, this man...When you have this many people unmarried, this many people divorced, so many babies not being born, the economy this bad...there is a big problem.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16046202647270439670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-64512875562059034102015-03-13T18:05:37.048-04:002015-03-13T18:05:37.048-04:00"“The biggest mistake…”
is deluding yourself..."“The biggest mistake…”<br /><br />is deluding yourself into thinking all or most [American] women are the devil incarnate. Grow up."<br /><br />Of course not all women are malevolent and intent on taking advantage of men. I believe there are many women that want a normal, loving marriage and family with a man. These women suffer too with what feminism has brought to society and relationships.<br /><br />The problem is a man doesn't really know what kind of woman he has. Women are notorious for changing after marriage, both physically (e.g., not maintaining weight and getting fat) and in personality for the worse. Women are also known to not show their true face when dating, only until after marriage are their true personalities unmasked. But, I know several divorces that were amicable, and the women did not take advantage of the system, and the split went fine and reasonable for both, but these cases are few unfortunately.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-88157345078385469692015-03-13T17:52:15.621-04:002015-03-13T17:52:15.621-04:00“The biggest mistake…”
is deluding yourself into ...“The biggest mistake…”<br /><br />is deluding yourself into thinking all or most [American] women are the devil incarnate. Grow up.<br /><br /><br />“you can just go back sixty years to when most of them were married and then look at the societal differences between then and now.”<br /><br />Those societal differences actually have their antecedents in the late 1800’s, when women became increasingly part of the economy by working in factory or service jobs and gained political and economic opportunities…compliments of men. Did not these men have the authority and liberty to grant these opportunities in the name of capitalism?MGTOW'd Outnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-5674087244583078572015-03-13T17:51:54.530-04:002015-03-13T17:51:54.530-04:00“I have pointed out before that back in college......“I have pointed out before that back in college...they were into a rage.”<br /> <br />Since we are offering anecdotal evidence, I will offer my own experience—back in college (late 80’s, early 90’s), young men and women dated…a LOT! Some had unrealistic expectations, while others were reasonable in what they sought after in the opposite sex. These standards would depend upon the person, not gender. Now, guys did everything they could to bed every women they deemed hot. Sometimes females with coaxing—clever conversation, some drinks, a combination of both—obliged. Those girls who did fuck the guys did so willingly and with depravity. Hooray! Other females remained headstrong in saying no and meaning no. We guys certainly didn’t like it, and used every trick in the book to deflower them. Still, no go. Also, on a number of occasions, I witnessed guys intervening on behalf of women who were drunk and being hit on by a guy whose intention was to simply violate her. They told the dude to take a hike and walked the girl home. Their “reward”? Knowing that they did the RIGHT thing. When guys did ask girls out, and they said “No, thanks”, the guys weren’t flustered. Rather, they said “Ok, there’s tons of other chicks out there to date or bang”. Likewise, when the girls realized a certain guy they had their eye on would never give them the time of day, they didn’t get into a rage. Instead, they moved on.<br /><br /><br />"Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married"<br /><br />[Sigh] This 70% figure is merely stating that men are not married. Nothing more, nothing less. Now, it does NOT offer insight into whether those men are 1) engaged, 2) seriously dating, 3) casually dating, or 4) MGTOW’ing it. Moreover, the author believes the primary factor is feminism and actually shames men to “step up” by marring and having children. The author even notes it is young men who set the criteria for intimate relationships, that the girls’ have to live by the guys’ demands, which means less romance and not offering a wedding ring as the ultimate prize. <br /><br />There are several reasons as to why we, as men, are not taking up the responsibilities of job, wife, and family—maturity issues, caught up in the Return Of Kings lifestyle, lack job prospects, seek to focus on their own career, school debt, getting out of a long-term relationship and want to be single, etc.*** The “scourge of feminism” as the LEADING factor. Perhaps. I would venture to say it our culture rooted in materialism that plays more of a role, but in the end, it makes for great mental masturbation and water cooler conversation. <br /><br />Thankfully, being married and having kids, and without any worries that my wife is going to cheat on me or “take me to the cleaners”, life is not good, it’s great. On the other hand, if a man chooses never to get married or a woman chooses to wait later in life to get married and/or have kids, it’s THEIR decision. I have my own life to lead. Do you?<br /><br /><br />“And because of how we've put women in this bubble of contraception, easy education, affirmative action, and higher pay...their pool of men they are attracted to shrinks and shrinks.”<br /><br />Do men NOT have the liberty to make these decisions, which was observably the result of male authoritarianism? They have been historically in power. They have made the laws and rules in this regard. Why cannot men in our representative democracy enable birth control, college opportunities, and increased wages for women as the means to continue with that control by building their empires?MGTOW'd Outnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-91671521272973896112015-03-13T16:24:20.474-04:002015-03-13T16:24:20.474-04:00"And when a guy they wanted didn't want t..."And when a guy they wanted didn't want them, they were into a rage."<br /><br />Just as asking a woman to make you a sandwich is a test of her character, so is telling her no. I went out on a date with a woman one time, and took her home at the conclusion of the date, kissed her goodbye, she attempted to continue and wanted me to come in for some nookie. No, the answer was. I had to get up early for work the next morning. Besides, I didn't know this woman from a hole in the ground. That didn't end well. But guys never say no, she said. But what she really meant was that guys aren't supposed to say no. And shouldn't be allowed to say no either. She was shocked beyond words that she would be told no, and that it was meant. And she flew into a rage when turned down. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.<br /><br />Nothing good comes out of being led around by your dick. This is part of why the manosphere guys are such fools with all their talk of "shit tests" and the like. With the Domestic Violence Gestapo, the Social Justice Warrior media and pussy begging, panty sniffing manginas/white knights eager to do battle to the death on behalf of every jizz guzzling slut that cries "RAAPPE!", it should be us doing the shit testing and a hell of a lot more of it.LosAngelesKingnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-66373905659232462002015-03-13T15:50:16.776-04:002015-03-13T15:50:16.776-04:00"Even if more women were decent and the syste..."Even if more women were decent and the system wasn't rigged they don't have much to offer anyway." <br /><br />Even if the marriage and divorce laws were changed to be fair and reasonable, I still wouldn't get married either. It's because of female nature, and its far from decent, but downright, cold, cruel and callous towards men. <br /><br />What do women really think about men? I don't know how much of Esther Vilars' book (The Manipulated Man) is true or not, about how women think about men, but it really gave me the creeps (One chapter is actually titled: Women have no feelings). A lot of bad experiences that I have had with women made sense to me after reading her book, Are men nothing but workhorses to women?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-74099500506391640712015-03-13T15:36:13.107-04:002015-03-13T15:36:13.107-04:00Reminds me of a Star Trek episode: Bound. The Orio...<br />Reminds me of a Star Trek episode: Bound. The Orions are green alien women that appear to be "slaves." However, the reverse is actually true: The green women are actually the masters of the men who are in fact the slaves:<br /><br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bound_(Star_Trek:_Enterprise)<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-48500385806032095052015-03-13T15:14:11.064-04:002015-03-13T15:14:11.064-04:00Who can blame them? There is little in marriage fo...Who can blame them? There is little in marriage for men.<br /><br />Even if more women were decent and the system wasn't rigged they don't have much to offer anyway. <br /><br />I guess in that sense the feminists got what they wanted, liberation for both genders as early feminists wanted . I hope they enjoy it. A.B. Prospernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8497093028548856666.post-14237692334548446512015-03-13T14:56:13.417-04:002015-03-13T14:56:13.417-04:00Reply, Part 2:
The single most misandric institut...Reply, Part 2:<br /><br />The single most misandric institution is marriage. Men give all of their power over to their wives when they marry, which is why men should never marry. It is the patriarchy that gave women this power over men though marriage, not feminists. If you look deeply into the agendas of major women’s groups, you’ll find them fighting to hold onto this anti-male power.<br /><br />What men really need to understand is that both the patriarchy and feminism are working against the vast majority of men; hence the debunked rape, wage and domestic violence statistics. That feminists and many male world leaders continue to run with the deeply flawed statistics tells you everything you need to know about their agenda. Why do they keep using the debunked wage, rape and DV stats? Men are now and have always been the disposable gender. This fact has never been more clear than today. The powerful, cowardly, white knights of the patriarchy will continue to throw men under the bus to appease the gynocracy. I guarantee.<br /><br />Our future is Sweden’s present. High out of wedlock births, low marriage rate, low indigenous birth rate, mass immigration, feminist movie censors, males made to pee sitting down, the redefinition of speech against feminism as hate speech, sky high taxes and misandric government leaders. Our future leaders will be split between feminists and their cowardly white knight lap dogs.<br /><br />Expect to see more and more policies and laws that shift men’s assets over to women in the relatively near future. Of course, these policies won’t be called “Bachelor Taxes” outright. Instead, men’s wealth will be shifted under the guise of equality and fairness, with a clear bias against the evil men and in favor of the poor, poor women. If you look carefully, many such laws and policies are now/have been in place for decades.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com